A comparison of steroid dose with or without local anesthetic in lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injections.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1111/papr.13410
Robert Chow, Jessica Ng, Melanie Wood, David Yanez, Zili He, Kanishka Rajput
{"title":"A comparison of steroid dose with or without local anesthetic in lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injections.","authors":"Robert Chow, Jessica Ng, Melanie Wood, David Yanez, Zili He, Kanishka Rajput","doi":"10.1111/papr.13410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are commonly used as a treatment for lumbar radiculopathy. Currently, most research on comparative efficacy of various steroids in epidural steroid injections is focused on transforaminal ESIs (TFESIs). Through this study, we aimed to compare various steroid doses with or without local anesthetic in interlaminar ESIs (ILESIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed charts for all adult patients who received ILESIs identified by CPT code 62323 between January 2017 to April 2021. Baseline demographic data including age, sex, BMI, and smoking status were recorded. NRS pain scores before the injection and percentage of pain relief at 1-month follow-up were recorded. We compared percentage of patients reporting pain relief at 1 month follow-up of low-dose dexamethasone alone (5 mg), to low-dose dexamethasone mixed with local anesthetic, and to high-dose dexamethasone (10 mg) mixed with local anesthetic, specifically for ILESIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were available for 311 patients. There was no significant difference in pain relief between the 3 groups at 1 month follow-up. The majority of patients had moderate to significant improvement in pain, supporting the use of ILESIs. Moreover, low-dose steroid with local anesthetic was found to be as efficacious as high-dose steroid alone. Although not statistically significant, the addition of local anesthetic to low-dose or high-dose steroid increased the percentage of patients reporting moderate to significant pain relief.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ILESIs with non-particulate steroids provide moderate to significant pain improvement in the short term, with low-dose steroid mixed with local anesthetic being as efficacious as a high-dose steroid.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13410","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are commonly used as a treatment for lumbar radiculopathy. Currently, most research on comparative efficacy of various steroids in epidural steroid injections is focused on transforaminal ESIs (TFESIs). Through this study, we aimed to compare various steroid doses with or without local anesthetic in interlaminar ESIs (ILESIs).

Methods: We reviewed charts for all adult patients who received ILESIs identified by CPT code 62323 between January 2017 to April 2021. Baseline demographic data including age, sex, BMI, and smoking status were recorded. NRS pain scores before the injection and percentage of pain relief at 1-month follow-up were recorded. We compared percentage of patients reporting pain relief at 1 month follow-up of low-dose dexamethasone alone (5 mg), to low-dose dexamethasone mixed with local anesthetic, and to high-dose dexamethasone (10 mg) mixed with local anesthetic, specifically for ILESIs.

Results: Data were available for 311 patients. There was no significant difference in pain relief between the 3 groups at 1 month follow-up. The majority of patients had moderate to significant improvement in pain, supporting the use of ILESIs. Moreover, low-dose steroid with local anesthetic was found to be as efficacious as high-dose steroid alone. Although not statistically significant, the addition of local anesthetic to low-dose or high-dose steroid increased the percentage of patients reporting moderate to significant pain relief.

Conclusion: ILESIs with non-particulate steroids provide moderate to significant pain improvement in the short term, with low-dose steroid mixed with local anesthetic being as efficacious as a high-dose steroid.

腰椎层间硬膜外类固醇注射中使用或不使用局部麻醉剂的类固醇剂量比较。
简介:硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)是治疗腰椎病的常用方法。目前,有关硬膜外类固醇注射中各种类固醇疗效比较的研究大多集中在经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射(TFESIs)上。通过这项研究,我们旨在比较各种类固醇剂量在进行层间硬膜外类固醇注射(ILESI)时使用或不使用局麻药的效果:我们查阅了 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 4 月期间接受 CPT 代码 62323 识别的 ILESI 的所有成年患者的病历。记录了基线人口统计学数据,包括年龄、性别、体重指数和吸烟状况。记录了注射前的 NRS 疼痛评分和随访 1 个月时疼痛缓解的百分比。我们比较了单独使用低剂量地塞米松(5 毫克)、低剂量地塞米松与局麻药混合使用以及高剂量地塞米松(10 毫克)与局麻药混合使用(特别是针对 ILESIs)的患者在随访 1 个月时报告疼痛缓解的百分比:结果:311 名患者的数据可用。随访 1 个月时,3 组患者的疼痛缓解程度无明显差异。大多数患者的疼痛得到了中度到明显的改善,这支持了 ILESIs 的使用。此外,低剂量类固醇联合局麻药的疗效与单独使用高剂量类固醇的疗效相同。虽然没有统计学意义,但在低剂量或高剂量类固醇中添加局麻药可增加中度至明显缓解疼痛的患者比例:结论:使用无颗粒类固醇的ILESI可在短期内中度至明显改善疼痛,低剂量类固醇与局麻药混合使用的疗效与高剂量类固醇相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Practice
Pain Practice ANESTHESIOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Practice, the official journal of the World Institute of Pain, publishes international multidisciplinary articles on pain and analgesia that provide its readership with up-to-date research, evaluation methods, and techniques for pain management. Special sections including the Consultant’s Corner, Images in Pain Practice, Case Studies from Mayo, Tutorials, and the Evidence-Based Medicine combine to give pain researchers, pain clinicians and pain fellows in training a systematic approach to continuing education in pain medicine. Prior to publication, all articles and reviews undergo peer review by at least two experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信