Dynamics of tumor evolution after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannoma: Defining volumetric patterns characterizing individual trajectory.

IF 16.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anne Balossier, Madalina Olteanu, Christine Delsanti, Lucas Troude, Jean-Marc Thomassin, Pierre-Hugues Roche, Marie Chavent, Jean Régis
{"title":"Dynamics of tumor evolution after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannoma: Defining volumetric patterns characterizing individual trajectory.","authors":"Anne Balossier, Madalina Olteanu, Christine Delsanti, Lucas Troude, Jean-Marc Thomassin, Pierre-Hugues Roche, Marie Chavent, Jean Régis","doi":"10.1093/neuonc/noae187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The definition of tumor control and treatment failure after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) is still debated. The lack of knowledge on the dynamics of tumor evolution can lead to misinterpretation and subsequent inappropriate second treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the post-GKRS dynamics of the evolution of tumor volume and characterize volumetric patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with sporadic VS treated by GKRS with an MRI follow-up of a minimum of 3 years. A clustering was performed in 2 steps: Definition of the patterns of evolution based on a subset of patients with the most comprehensive follow-up, and then the assignment of the remaining patients on a best-fit basis. The minimum length of follow-up was assessed by measuring the consistency of the clusters over time (adjusted rand index and normalized mutual information). An analysis of the discriminant variables was finally performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1607 patients were included (median follow-up: 67 months). Five patterns were defined with 1 pattern gathering almost all cases of treatment failure. The clustering at 5 years afforded the highest consistency with long-term follow-up. Discriminant variables for clusters were as follows: sex, initial symptoms, delay of diagnosis, Koos grading, fundus invasion, and number of isocenters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The definition of these robust distinct patterns is likely to help the physicians tremendously to distinguish tumor control from potential failure. We advocate for no retreatment decision before 5 years post-GKRS. Further investigations are required to decide if the dynamics of evolution can be predicted at GKRS on an individual basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19377,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology","volume":" ","pages":"545-556"},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae187","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The definition of tumor control and treatment failure after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) is still debated. The lack of knowledge on the dynamics of tumor evolution can lead to misinterpretation and subsequent inappropriate second treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the post-GKRS dynamics of the evolution of tumor volume and characterize volumetric patterns.

Methods: We included patients with sporadic VS treated by GKRS with an MRI follow-up of a minimum of 3 years. A clustering was performed in 2 steps: Definition of the patterns of evolution based on a subset of patients with the most comprehensive follow-up, and then the assignment of the remaining patients on a best-fit basis. The minimum length of follow-up was assessed by measuring the consistency of the clusters over time (adjusted rand index and normalized mutual information). An analysis of the discriminant variables was finally performed.

Results: A total of 1607 patients were included (median follow-up: 67 months). Five patterns were defined with 1 pattern gathering almost all cases of treatment failure. The clustering at 5 years afforded the highest consistency with long-term follow-up. Discriminant variables for clusters were as follows: sex, initial symptoms, delay of diagnosis, Koos grading, fundus invasion, and number of isocenters.

Conclusions: The definition of these robust distinct patterns is likely to help the physicians tremendously to distinguish tumor control from potential failure. We advocate for no retreatment decision before 5 years post-GKRS. Further investigations are required to decide if the dynamics of evolution can be predicted at GKRS on an individual basis.

伽玛刀放射外科治疗散发性前庭裂隙瘤后肿瘤演变的动力学:确定个体轨迹的体积模式。
背景:前庭分裂瘤(VS)伽玛刀放射外科手术(GKRS)后肿瘤控制和治疗失败的定义仍存在争议。由于缺乏对肿瘤演变动态的了解,可能会导致误解和不恰当的二次治疗。本研究旨在评估 GKRS 术后肿瘤体积的动态演变,并描述肿瘤体积模式:我们纳入了接受 GKRS 治疗、磁共振成像随访至少 3 年的散发性 VS 患者。我们分两步进行了聚类:根据随访最全面的患者子集定义演变模式,然后根据最佳拟合原则分配其余患者。通过测量聚类随时间变化的一致性(调整后的兰德指数和归一化互信息)来评估随访的最短时间。最后进行了判别变量分析:共纳入 1,607 名患者(中位随访时间:67 个月)。共确定了五种模式,其中一种模式聚集了几乎所有的治疗失败病例。5 年的分组与长期随访的一致性最高。聚类的判别变量包括:性别、初始症状、诊断延迟、Koos分级、眼底侵犯和等中心数量:这些强大的独特模式的定义可能会极大地帮助医生区分肿瘤控制和潜在的失败。我们主张在 GKRS 术后 5 年前不做再治疗决定。我们还需要进一步的研究,以确定是否可以根据个体情况预测 GKRS 的演变动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology
Neuro-oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
6.30%
发文量
1434
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology, the official journal of the Society for Neuro-Oncology, has been published monthly since January 2010. Affiliated with the Japan Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology, it is a global leader in the field. The journal is committed to swiftly disseminating high-quality information across all areas of neuro-oncology. It features peer-reviewed articles, reviews, symposia on various topics, abstracts from annual meetings, and updates from neuro-oncology societies worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信