Clinical and biomechanical comparison of suture-external button versus interference screw associated with V-Y advancement or turndown flaps for flexor hallucis longus transfer in chronic Achilles tendon rupture.

Q1 Medicine
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1007/s12306-024-00857-7
A R Vosoughi, A Akbarzadeh, S Brevis, A Kordi Yoosefinejad
{"title":"Clinical and biomechanical comparison of suture-external button versus interference screw associated with V-Y advancement or turndown flaps for flexor hallucis longus transfer in chronic Achilles tendon rupture.","authors":"A R Vosoughi, A Akbarzadeh, S Brevis, A Kordi Yoosefinejad","doi":"10.1007/s12306-024-00857-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Surgical treatment of chronic Achilles tendon rupture is a technically challenging procedure. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes, range of motion, and strength of ankle plantar- and dorsiflexors between two techniques for fixation of flexor hallucis longus tendon to the calcaneus: interference screw and suture-external button.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five patients participated in this retrospective comparative study. All patients underwent short harvest FHL tendon transfer for chronic AT rupture were asked for a follow-up visit, at least one year following surgery. The outcomes were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS), AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, and VISA-A questionnaire. Ankle ROM with possible restriction in addition to isokinetic strength of ankle plantar- and dorsiflexors was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups for pain (P = 0.81), AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale (P = 0.97), and VISA-A (P = 0.44). Notably, more decrease in ankle dorsiflexion was seen in interference screw group in comparison with suture-external button group (4.4 ± 6.6 vs. 9.5 ± 6.1 degrees, P = 0.06). The difference of active dorsiflexion between operated and non-operated side in interference screw group was statistically significant (P = 0.02). Biotenodesis screw imposed more limb asymmetry in comparison with suture-external button technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fixation of transcalcaneal FHL tendon transfer for chronic AT either by interference screw or suture-external button has encouraging postoperative clinical results. Although ROM of the ankle joint reduced in both techniques, interference screw may result in more reduction in dorsiflexion of the ankle.</p>","PeriodicalId":18875,"journal":{"name":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","volume":" ","pages":"167-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-024-00857-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Surgical treatment of chronic Achilles tendon rupture is a technically challenging procedure. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes, range of motion, and strength of ankle plantar- and dorsiflexors between two techniques for fixation of flexor hallucis longus tendon to the calcaneus: interference screw and suture-external button.

Methods: Twenty-five patients participated in this retrospective comparative study. All patients underwent short harvest FHL tendon transfer for chronic AT rupture were asked for a follow-up visit, at least one year following surgery. The outcomes were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS), AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, and VISA-A questionnaire. Ankle ROM with possible restriction in addition to isokinetic strength of ankle plantar- and dorsiflexors was assessed.

Results: No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups for pain (P = 0.81), AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale (P = 0.97), and VISA-A (P = 0.44). Notably, more decrease in ankle dorsiflexion was seen in interference screw group in comparison with suture-external button group (4.4 ± 6.6 vs. 9.5 ± 6.1 degrees, P = 0.06). The difference of active dorsiflexion between operated and non-operated side in interference screw group was statistically significant (P = 0.02). Biotenodesis screw imposed more limb asymmetry in comparison with suture-external button technique.

Conclusions: Fixation of transcalcaneal FHL tendon transfer for chronic AT either by interference screw or suture-external button has encouraging postoperative clinical results. Although ROM of the ankle joint reduced in both techniques, interference screw may result in more reduction in dorsiflexion of the ankle.

在慢性跟腱断裂的屈拇长肌转移中,缝合外扣与过盈螺钉结合 V-Y 推进瓣或翻转瓣的临床和生物力学比较。
目的:慢性跟腱断裂的手术治疗在技术上具有挑战性。我们旨在比较两种将拇屈肌肌腱固定在小腿骨上的技术:过盈螺钉和缝合外扣的临床疗效、活动范围以及踝关节跖屈和背屈的力量:25名患者参与了这项回顾性比较研究。所有因慢性闭孔肌腱断裂而接受短收FHL肌腱转移术的患者都被要求在术后至少一年进行随访。研究结果通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)、AOFAS踝关节-后足评分和VISA-A问卷进行评估。除了评估踝关节跖屈和背屈的等速力量外,还评估了可能受限的踝关节ROM:结果:在疼痛(P = 0.81)、AOFAS 踝关节-后足部量表(P = 0.97)和 VISA-A (P = 0.44)方面,观察到两组间无统计学差异。值得注意的是,与缝合-外扣组相比,干扰螺钉组的踝关节背屈下降幅度更大(4.4 ± 6.6 对 9.5 ± 6.1 度,P = 0.06)。干扰螺钉组手术侧和非手术侧的主动外展差异有统计学意义(P = 0.02)。与缝合-外扣技术相比,生物节段螺钉造成的肢体不对称程度更高:结论:采用干扰螺钉或缝合-外扣技术固定经髌骨FHL肌腱转移治疗慢性AT,术后临床效果令人鼓舞。虽然两种技术都会降低踝关节的活动度,但干扰螺钉可能会导致踝关节外展度降低更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Surgery – Formerly La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento, founded in 1917 at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, is a peer-reviewed journal published three times a year. The journal provides up-to-date information to clinicians and scientists through the publication of original papers, reviews, case reports, and brief communications dealing with the pathogenesis and treatment of orthopaedic conditions.An electronic version is also available at http://www.springerlink.com.The journal is open for publication of supplements and for publishing abstracts of scientific meetings; conditions can be obtained from the Editors-in-Chief or the Publisher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信