Essential concepts for effective mixed methods research in the health professions: AMEE Guide No. 173.

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Medical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2024.2401464
Alexis Battista, Dario Torre, Abigail Konopasky
{"title":"Essential concepts for effective mixed methods research in the health professions: AMEE Guide No. 173.","authors":"Alexis Battista, Dario Torre, Abigail Konopasky","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2401464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mixed-methods research involves combining quantitative and qualitative approaches and mixing and integrating at multiple stages. It is gaining more attention and interest in health professions education research and evaluation. However, many undertake mixed-methods research for the first time without a rich understanding of the differences in practice associated with mixed-methods research. This often leads to research efforts that do not result in more complex, nuanced understandings of the phenomena being studied. Mixed-methods research requires researchers to thoughtfully and often creatively weave together their projects' various qualitative and quantitative strands. This effort ideally starts at the design stage and continues through the remainder of the research effort. We have aggregated resources and organized this guide to introduce researchers to what we see as some essential concepts, practices, and scholarship in mixed methods which will be useful to those just starting on their mixed-methods journey and those already engaging in mixed-methods research. This guide begins by discussing three vital characteristics of mixed-methods research that set it apart from mono-method research: its purposes, alternative philosophical stances, and integration, long viewed as a defining characteristic. We then discuss further important considerations, such as conducting mixed-methods literature reviews, timing and priority of qualitative and quantitative strands, and research design typologies. To complement these discussions, we have provided illustrative examples of high-quality peer-reviewed mixed-methods research from health professions education and other closely associated areas (e.g. health and clinical research). This guide also includes several activities and recommended resources, such as journals, textbooks, and professional societies, that researchers can use to deepen their practice and understanding and mixed-methods research. We hope the content, resources, article examples, and activities will be the prologue to fruitful explorations of mixed-methods research, helping researchers make informed, intentional choices about future mixed-methods efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"766-778"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2401464","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mixed-methods research involves combining quantitative and qualitative approaches and mixing and integrating at multiple stages. It is gaining more attention and interest in health professions education research and evaluation. However, many undertake mixed-methods research for the first time without a rich understanding of the differences in practice associated with mixed-methods research. This often leads to research efforts that do not result in more complex, nuanced understandings of the phenomena being studied. Mixed-methods research requires researchers to thoughtfully and often creatively weave together their projects' various qualitative and quantitative strands. This effort ideally starts at the design stage and continues through the remainder of the research effort. We have aggregated resources and organized this guide to introduce researchers to what we see as some essential concepts, practices, and scholarship in mixed methods which will be useful to those just starting on their mixed-methods journey and those already engaging in mixed-methods research. This guide begins by discussing three vital characteristics of mixed-methods research that set it apart from mono-method research: its purposes, alternative philosophical stances, and integration, long viewed as a defining characteristic. We then discuss further important considerations, such as conducting mixed-methods literature reviews, timing and priority of qualitative and quantitative strands, and research design typologies. To complement these discussions, we have provided illustrative examples of high-quality peer-reviewed mixed-methods research from health professions education and other closely associated areas (e.g. health and clinical research). This guide also includes several activities and recommended resources, such as journals, textbooks, and professional societies, that researchers can use to deepen their practice and understanding and mixed-methods research. We hope the content, resources, article examples, and activities will be the prologue to fruitful explorations of mixed-methods research, helping researchers make informed, intentional choices about future mixed-methods efforts.

卫生专业中有效混合方法研究的基本概念:AMEE Guide No.
混合方法研究涉及定量和定性方法的结合,并在多个阶段进行混合和整合。它在卫生专业教育研究和评估中越来越受到重视和关注。然而,许多人在首次开展混合方法研究时,并没有充分了解与混合方法研究相关的实践差异。这往往导致研究工作无法对所研究的现象产生更复杂、更细致入微的理解。混合方法研究要求研究人员深思熟虑,并经常创造性地将其项目中的各种定性和定量内容编织在一起。这项工作最好从设计阶段开始,并贯穿研究工作的其余部分。我们汇集了各种资源,整理了本指南,向研究人员介绍我们所认为的混合方法中的一些基本概念、实践和学术成果,这对刚刚开始混合方法研究的人员和已经参与混合方法研究的人员都很有用。本指南首先讨论了混合方法研究有别于单一方法研究的三个重要特征:混合方法研究的目的、可供选择的哲学立场以及长期以来被视为决定性特征的整合。然后,我们进一步讨论了一些重要的注意事项,如进行混合方法文献综述、定性和定量研究的时间和优先顺序以及研究设计类型。为了补充这些讨论,我们提供了来自卫生专业教育和其他密切相关领域(如卫生和临床研究)的高质量同行评审混合方法研究的示例。本指南还包括几项活动和推荐资源,如期刊、教科书和专业协会,研究人员可以利用这些活动和资源加深对混合方法研究的实践和理解。我们希望本指南的内容、资源、文章示例和活动将成为对混合方法研究进行富有成效的探索的序幕,帮助研究人员在未来的混合方法研究工作中做出明智、有意的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信