Selective ultrasound-guided nerve root block improves outcomes for discectomy in patients with cervical disc disease: a randomized, controlled, single-blinded study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Marwa M Abdelrady, King H Lam, Nehal Shabaan, Manal Hassanien, Esam Mokbel, Doaa W Nada, Amira M El Sharkawy, Kareem M Ramadan, Yasser Ghoraba, Abdallah E Allam, Ghada M Aboelfadl
{"title":"Selective ultrasound-guided nerve root block improves outcomes for discectomy in patients with cervical disc disease: a randomized, controlled, single-blinded study.","authors":"Marwa M Abdelrady, King H Lam, Nehal Shabaan, Manal Hassanien, Esam Mokbel, Doaa W Nada, Amira M El Sharkawy, Kareem M Ramadan, Yasser Ghoraba, Abdallah E Allam, Ghada M Aboelfadl","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.24.17989-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We hypothesized that ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block could play a role in the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with multilevel cervical disease following selective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided selected nerve root block as a diagnostic tool (study group) or not (control group), but both groups had surgery. Pain evaluation for arm and neck pain was recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, Neck Disability Index, and MRI results were compared between groups. They were assessed every two weeks for three months, postoperatively. The percentage of patients who showed ≥ 50% reduction in their pain levels and a VAS rating of ≤2 was deemed an acceptable surgical outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the study group had significantly lower VAS scores for pain intensity than control patients at nearly all periods. This baseline pain improved significantly in the study group. A more significant proportion of patients in the study group showed a ≥50% reduction in their pain scores from baseline at weeks four, eight, and 12, and this difference was significantly lower than in the control group (P<0.05). The study group improved significantly over baseline in Neck Disability Index scores compared to control patients. Patients were highly satisfied with no significant adverse events in the study group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with multilevel cervical disease, ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block is an excellent, safe, non-radiating, and reliable test to determine the appropriate level for operation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":"90 9","pages":"748-758"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.24.17989-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We hypothesized that ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block could play a role in the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with multilevel cervical disease following selective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Methods: Patients were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided selected nerve root block as a diagnostic tool (study group) or not (control group), but both groups had surgery. Pain evaluation for arm and neck pain was recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, Neck Disability Index, and MRI results were compared between groups. They were assessed every two weeks for three months, postoperatively. The percentage of patients who showed ≥ 50% reduction in their pain levels and a VAS rating of ≤2 was deemed an acceptable surgical outcome.

Results: Patients in the study group had significantly lower VAS scores for pain intensity than control patients at nearly all periods. This baseline pain improved significantly in the study group. A more significant proportion of patients in the study group showed a ≥50% reduction in their pain scores from baseline at weeks four, eight, and 12, and this difference was significantly lower than in the control group (P<0.05). The study group improved significantly over baseline in Neck Disability Index scores compared to control patients. Patients were highly satisfied with no significant adverse events in the study group.

Conclusions: In patients with multilevel cervical disease, ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block is an excellent, safe, non-radiating, and reliable test to determine the appropriate level for operation.

选择性超声引导神经根阻滞可改善颈椎间盘疾病患者椎间盘切除术的疗效:一项随机对照单盲研究。
背景:我们假设超声引导下的选择性神经根阻滞可在选择性颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术后的多水平颈椎病患者的临床预后预测中发挥作用:患者被随机分为接受超声引导下选择性神经根阻滞作为诊断工具(研究组)或不接受超声引导下选择性神经根阻滞作为诊断工具(对照组),但两组患者均接受手术治疗。记录对手臂和颈部疼痛的评估。比较两组的视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、颈部残疾指数和核磁共振成像结果。术后三个月内每两周进行一次评估。疼痛程度减轻≥50%且VAS评分≤2分的患者比例被视为可接受的手术结果:研究组患者在几乎所有时间段的疼痛强度 VAS 评分都明显低于对照组患者。研究组患者的基线疼痛明显改善。在第4周、第8周和第12周,研究组有相当一部分患者的疼痛评分比基线降低了≥50%,而这一差异明显低于对照组(PC结论:对于患有多级颈椎病的患者,超声引导下选择性神经根阻滞是一种出色、安全、无辐射且可靠的检测方法,可用于确定手术的适当级别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信