A comparative analysis of elevated endotracheal tube cuff pressure incidence in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: saline versus air inflation.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Ozge Siktas, Ersel Gulec, Mediha Turktan, Zehra Hatipoglu, Demet Lafli Tunay, Dilek Ozcengiz
{"title":"A comparative analysis of elevated endotracheal tube cuff pressure incidence in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: saline versus air inflation.","authors":"Ozge Siktas, Ersel Gulec, Mediha Turktan, Zehra Hatipoglu, Demet Lafli Tunay, Dilek Ozcengiz","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18078-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endotracheal intubation is a frequently performed procedure in anesthesia practice, and ensuring the correct inflation of the cuff is essential for maintaining the airway seal. Overinflation of endotracheal tube (ETT) cuffs can lead to complications, such as postoperative sore throat. This study aimed to compare the incidence of elevated ETT cuff pressure between saline and air inflation in elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved 60 participants ranging in age from 18 to 65, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status levels 1-2, who underwent laparoscopic abdominal surgery. We randomly assigned patients to two groups: Group A (air-filled ETT cuffs, N.=30) and Group S (saline-filled ETT cuffs, N.=30). Intra-cuff pressure was recorded before and after CO<inf>2</inf> insufflation, as well as during changes in patient position. The number of interventions to restore intra-cuff pressure to 18 mmHg was documented. Peak airway pressure, plateau pressure, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were measured at 15-minute intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of interventions needed to maintain intra-cuff pressure was significantly lower in the saline group compared to the air group. All patients started with initial cuff pressures above 20 mmHg. After insufflation, the first-minute cuff pressures were higher in the air group (P=0.001). Both groups experienced a significant increase in intra-cuff pressure with the Trendelenburg position, and after moving to the reverse Trendelenburg position (saline and air groups, P=0.001 and 0.012, respectively), the air group had higher intra-cuff pressure than the saline group (P=0.002). There were no significant differences between groups in peak airway pressure, plateau pressure, and PEEP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inflating ETT cuffs with saline instead of air during laparoscopic abdominal surgeries led to a reduced requirement for interventions in maintaining pressure. This indicates that the use of saline inflation may significantly lower the risk of high cuff pressure and related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":"90 9","pages":"739-747"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18078-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endotracheal intubation is a frequently performed procedure in anesthesia practice, and ensuring the correct inflation of the cuff is essential for maintaining the airway seal. Overinflation of endotracheal tube (ETT) cuffs can lead to complications, such as postoperative sore throat. This study aimed to compare the incidence of elevated ETT cuff pressure between saline and air inflation in elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

Methods: The study involved 60 participants ranging in age from 18 to 65, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status levels 1-2, who underwent laparoscopic abdominal surgery. We randomly assigned patients to two groups: Group A (air-filled ETT cuffs, N.=30) and Group S (saline-filled ETT cuffs, N.=30). Intra-cuff pressure was recorded before and after CO2 insufflation, as well as during changes in patient position. The number of interventions to restore intra-cuff pressure to 18 mmHg was documented. Peak airway pressure, plateau pressure, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were measured at 15-minute intervals.

Results: The number of interventions needed to maintain intra-cuff pressure was significantly lower in the saline group compared to the air group. All patients started with initial cuff pressures above 20 mmHg. After insufflation, the first-minute cuff pressures were higher in the air group (P=0.001). Both groups experienced a significant increase in intra-cuff pressure with the Trendelenburg position, and after moving to the reverse Trendelenburg position (saline and air groups, P=0.001 and 0.012, respectively), the air group had higher intra-cuff pressure than the saline group (P=0.002). There were no significant differences between groups in peak airway pressure, plateau pressure, and PEEP.

Conclusions: Inflating ETT cuffs with saline instead of air during laparoscopic abdominal surgeries led to a reduced requirement for interventions in maintaining pressure. This indicates that the use of saline inflation may significantly lower the risk of high cuff pressure and related complications.

腹腔镜腹部手术中气管导管袖带压力升高发生率的比较分析:生理盐水充气与空气充气。
背景:气管插管是麻醉实践中经常进行的操作,而确保充气罩囊的正确充气对保持气道密封至关重要。气管插管(ETT)充气罩囊过度充气可导致术后咽喉痛等并发症。本研究旨在比较择期腹腔镜腹部手术中生理盐水充气和空气充气时 ETT 袖带压力升高的发生率:这项研究涉及 60 名接受腹腔镜腹部手术的参与者,年龄从 18 岁到 65 岁不等,美国麻醉医师协会身体状况等级为 1-2 级。我们将患者随机分为两组:A组(充气 ETT 袖带,30 人)和 S 组(充盐 ETT 袖带,30 人)。在二氧化碳充气前后以及患者体位变化时记录充气罩囊内压。记录了将充气罩囊内压恢复到 18 mmHg 的干预次数。每隔 15 分钟测量一次气道峰压、高原压和呼气末正压(PEEP):结果:与空气组相比,生理盐水组维持充气罩囊内压所需的干预次数明显较少。所有患者的初始充气罩囊压均高于 20 毫米汞柱。充气后,空气组患者第一分钟的袖带压力更高(P=0.001)。采用 Trendelenburg 体位时,两组的袖带内压都有显著增加,而在改为反 Trendelenburg 体位后(生理盐水组和空气组,P=0.001 和 0.012),空气组的袖带内压高于生理盐水组(P=0.002)。各组在气道峰压、高原压和 PEEP 方面无明显差异:结论:在腹腔镜腹部手术中使用生理盐水而非空气为 ETT 袖带充气可减少维持压力的干预需求。这表明使用生理盐水充气可显著降低充气罩囊压力过高和相关并发症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信