A Pain Desensitization Algorithm for Phenotyping and Treating Chronic Pelvic Pain.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Liane Silva Rafael Rogério, Maurice K Chung, Charles W Butrick, Stanley J Antolak, Danniel Rocha Bevilaqua, Sunna Kureishy, Mariana Eiras Cardoso Conforto
{"title":"A Pain Desensitization Algorithm for Phenotyping and Treating Chronic Pelvic Pain.","authors":"Liane Silva Rafael Rogério, Maurice K Chung, Charles W Butrick, Stanley J Antolak, Danniel Rocha Bevilaqua, Sunna Kureishy, Mariana Eiras Cardoso Conforto","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2024.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pelvic pain remains challenging for physicians to manage due to central and peripheral sensitization and multiple pain generators including the bladder, pelvic floor, and pudendal nerve. Pain management providers have used nerve blocks for years for diagnosis and treatment. We developed a desensitization algorithm that provides a stepwise approach to improve patients pain scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective observational cohort study of 182 women aged 15-90 years old with chronic pelvic pain using an algorithm from 2016 to 2018. Treatment started with an Anesthetic Challenge Test of the bladder to guide us through a protocol of intravesical therapy and/or pudendal nerve blocks as a second step.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ACT POSITIVE patients, who received intravesical therapy: 84% had a Visual Analog Score pain improvement of at least 50%, 64% improved at least 80% (41% pain-free). Those desiring additional relief that received further Pudendal Blocks: 83% had final improvement of at least 50% (67% pain-free). ACT NEGATIVE patients received Pudendal Blocks with 80% of subjects achieving at least 50% relief, 65% improved at least 80% (35% pain-free). All final groups showed a statistically significance of <i>P</i> < .05% when compared to their initial pain scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Management of women with chronic pelvic pain would ideally start with treating a specific diagnosis which, in most cases, is difficult to establish since the majority have more than one pain generator. Our algorithm simplified the approach and reduced the severity of pain scores prior to any further necessary surgical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11406477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2024.00009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic pelvic pain remains challenging for physicians to manage due to central and peripheral sensitization and multiple pain generators including the bladder, pelvic floor, and pudendal nerve. Pain management providers have used nerve blocks for years for diagnosis and treatment. We developed a desensitization algorithm that provides a stepwise approach to improve patients pain scores.

Methods: This is a prospective observational cohort study of 182 women aged 15-90 years old with chronic pelvic pain using an algorithm from 2016 to 2018. Treatment started with an Anesthetic Challenge Test of the bladder to guide us through a protocol of intravesical therapy and/or pudendal nerve blocks as a second step.

Results: ACT POSITIVE patients, who received intravesical therapy: 84% had a Visual Analog Score pain improvement of at least 50%, 64% improved at least 80% (41% pain-free). Those desiring additional relief that received further Pudendal Blocks: 83% had final improvement of at least 50% (67% pain-free). ACT NEGATIVE patients received Pudendal Blocks with 80% of subjects achieving at least 50% relief, 65% improved at least 80% (35% pain-free). All final groups showed a statistically significance of P < .05% when compared to their initial pain scores.

Conclusion: Management of women with chronic pelvic pain would ideally start with treating a specific diagnosis which, in most cases, is difficult to establish since the majority have more than one pain generator. Our algorithm simplified the approach and reduced the severity of pain scores prior to any further necessary surgical interventions.

用于表型和治疗慢性盆腔疼痛的疼痛脱敏算法。
背景:由于中枢和外周的敏感性以及包括膀胱、盆底和阴部神经在内的多种疼痛发生器,慢性盆腔疼痛对医生来说仍然具有挑战性。多年来,疼痛治疗提供者一直使用神经阻滞进行诊断和治疗。我们开发了一种脱敏算法,提供了一种逐步改善患者疼痛评分的方法:这是一项前瞻性观察性队列研究,从 2016 年到 2018 年,对 182 名年龄在 15-90 岁之间、患有慢性盆腔疼痛的女性采用了该算法。治疗从膀胱麻醉挑战测试开始,作为第二步,通过膀胱内治疗和/或阴部神经阻滞方案为我们提供指导:ACT阳性患者接受膀胱内治疗后:84%的患者视觉模拟评分疼痛改善至少50%,64%改善至少80%(41%无痛)。那些希望进一步缓解疼痛的患者接受了进一步的牡丹膜阻滞治疗:83% 的患者最终疼痛改善了至少 50% (67% 无痛)。ACT阴性的患者接受了耻骨上阻滞治疗,80%的受试者至少缓解了50%的症状,65%的受试者至少改善了80%的症状(35%的受试者无痛)。所有最终分组的 P 值在统计学上都有显著意义:对患有慢性盆腔痛的妇女进行治疗时,理想的做法是先进行具体诊断,但在大多数情况下,很难确定具体诊断,因为大多数人都有不止一种疼痛诱因。我们的算法简化了治疗方法,并在采取任何必要的手术干预措施之前降低了疼痛评分的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信