Potential Drug Interactions in Hospitalized Hematologic Cancer Patients: New Update with New Chemotherapy Regimens.

IF 0.8 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-08 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_40_24
Tahereh Gholipourshahraki, Amir Aria, Mehran Sharifi, Ayda Moghadas, Azadeh Moghaddas
{"title":"Potential Drug Interactions in Hospitalized Hematologic Cancer Patients: New Update with New Chemotherapy Regimens.","authors":"Tahereh Gholipourshahraki, Amir Aria, Mehran Sharifi, Ayda Moghadas, Azadeh Moghaddas","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_40_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the frequency of potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and demographic correlates of moderate and major DDIs among patients with hematologic cancer at a referral hematology hospital in Iran.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, for 6 months, all patients suffering from hematologic cancers admitted to the tertiary oncology hospital, Omid, Isfahan, were considered. Data from all medications prescribed to patients during hospitalization were analyzed using the online Lexicomp<sup>®</sup> drug interaction checker, recording all interactions classified by risk level: C, D, or X.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 674 DDIs were detected in 109 patients. The prevalence of treatments with at least one clinically relevant interaction was 95%, being 57.9% for those at level C and 31.5% for levels D and X. According to the frequency, the main interaction was between aprepitant and corticosteroids, followed by the interaction between aprepitant and vincristine. The most common interaction between antineoplastic agents was between doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. In terms of mechanism, most of DDIs (54.9%) were pharmacodynamics. Only the number of administered medications was associated with DDI occurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Potential DDIs of moderate to major severity are common among patients with hematologic malignancies. This underscores the importance of implementing different strategies to mitigate this clinically significant risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"12 4","pages":"115-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11386064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_40_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the frequency of potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and demographic correlates of moderate and major DDIs among patients with hematologic cancer at a referral hematology hospital in Iran.

Methods: In this study, for 6 months, all patients suffering from hematologic cancers admitted to the tertiary oncology hospital, Omid, Isfahan, were considered. Data from all medications prescribed to patients during hospitalization were analyzed using the online Lexicomp® drug interaction checker, recording all interactions classified by risk level: C, D, or X.

Findings: A total of 674 DDIs were detected in 109 patients. The prevalence of treatments with at least one clinically relevant interaction was 95%, being 57.9% for those at level C and 31.5% for levels D and X. According to the frequency, the main interaction was between aprepitant and corticosteroids, followed by the interaction between aprepitant and vincristine. The most common interaction between antineoplastic agents was between doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. In terms of mechanism, most of DDIs (54.9%) were pharmacodynamics. Only the number of administered medications was associated with DDI occurrence.

Conclusion: Potential DDIs of moderate to major severity are common among patients with hematologic malignancies. This underscores the importance of implementing different strategies to mitigate this clinically significant risk.

住院血液肿瘤患者的潜在药物相互作用:新化疗方案的最新进展。
目的:本横断面研究旨在评估伊朗血液病转诊医院血液肿瘤患者中潜在的药物相互作用(DDIs)频率以及中度和重度 DDIs 的人口统计学相关性:这项横断面研究旨在评估伊朗一家血液病转诊医院的血液肿瘤患者中潜在的药物相互作用(DDI)频率以及中度和重度 DDI 的人口统计学相关性:在这项研究中,考虑了伊斯法罕市奥米德三级肿瘤医院在 6 个月内收治的所有血液肿瘤患者。使用在线 Lexicomp® 药物相互作用检查器分析了患者住院期间所有处方药的数据,并记录了按风险等级分类的所有相互作用:结果:结果:109 名患者共检测出 674 种 DDI。根据频率,主要的相互作用是阿培坦与皮质类固醇之间的相互作用,其次是阿培坦与长春新碱之间的相互作用。抗肿瘤药物之间最常见的相互作用是多柔比星和环磷酰胺之间的相互作用。就机制而言,大多数 DDIs(54.9%)属于药效学范畴。只有用药次数与DDI发生率有关:结论:在血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中,中度至重度的潜在 DDIs 很常见。结论:在血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中,潜在的中度至重度DDIs很常见,这强调了实施不同策略以降低这一临床重大风险的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The main focus of the journal will be on evidence-based drug-related medical researches (with clinical pharmacists’ intervention or documentation), particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, a wide range of closely related issues will be also covered. These will include clinical studies in the field of pharmaceutical care, reporting adverse drug reactions and human medical toxicology, pharmaco-epidemiology and toxico-epidemiology (poisoning epidemiology), social aspects of pharmacy practice, pharmacy education and economic evaluations of treatment protocols (e.g. cost-effectiveness studies). Local reports of medication utilization studies at hospital or pharmacy levels will only be considered for peer-review process only if they have a new and useful message for the international pharmacy practice professionals and readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信