A Pilot Project to Implement a Pharmacist-Managed Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Service.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kaci Boehmer, Chris Johnson
{"title":"A Pilot Project to Implement a Pharmacist-Managed Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Service.","authors":"Kaci Boehmer, Chris Johnson","doi":"10.1177/08971900241285943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Clinicians often hesitate to adjust antihypertensive medications based solely on clinic blood pressure (BP) readings. Limitations to obtaining home readings include access to sphygmomanometers and ability to provide accurate, reliable readings upon follow-up. <b>Objective:</b> This study examined whether an online platform linked to remote BP monitoring improved BP management and facilitated effective clinical interventions by pharmacists. <b>Methods:</b> Thirty patients with uncontrolled hypertension were enrolled and provided a remote BP monitor for home use. BP data downloaded to an online platform were monitored by two clinic pharmacists. Daily BP checks were requested (up to twice daily), and pharmacists called patients approximately weekly for 6 months. Through approved protocols, pharmacists individualized interventions to improve patient care. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic and clinical data. <b>Results:</b> The average systolic BP reduction was 39 mmHg (IQR = 17-52.5) for the 21 patients included in analysis. A target BP <140/<90 was achieved by 67%, and 76% had improved BP control. Patients utilized the cuff 2-4 times (n = 10) or >5 times weekly (n = 11). Through 261 patient contact attempts, the pharmacists requested more BP checks (n = 62), changed medications (n = 57), or provided non-pharmacologic counseling (n = 24) most often. Medication changes commonly included dose increases (n = 35) and additional agents (n = 17) for BP control. Spironolactone (n = 5) and thiazide diuretics (n = 5) were the most added medications. <b>Conclusions:</b> Most patients were willing to check their BP when provided with devices. The majority achieved a clinically significant decrease in home BP readings, demonstrating that pharmacist-driven home-monitoring programs can improve the optimization of hypertension regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"8971900241285943"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241285943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinicians often hesitate to adjust antihypertensive medications based solely on clinic blood pressure (BP) readings. Limitations to obtaining home readings include access to sphygmomanometers and ability to provide accurate, reliable readings upon follow-up. Objective: This study examined whether an online platform linked to remote BP monitoring improved BP management and facilitated effective clinical interventions by pharmacists. Methods: Thirty patients with uncontrolled hypertension were enrolled and provided a remote BP monitor for home use. BP data downloaded to an online platform were monitored by two clinic pharmacists. Daily BP checks were requested (up to twice daily), and pharmacists called patients approximately weekly for 6 months. Through approved protocols, pharmacists individualized interventions to improve patient care. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic and clinical data. Results: The average systolic BP reduction was 39 mmHg (IQR = 17-52.5) for the 21 patients included in analysis. A target BP <140/<90 was achieved by 67%, and 76% had improved BP control. Patients utilized the cuff 2-4 times (n = 10) or >5 times weekly (n = 11). Through 261 patient contact attempts, the pharmacists requested more BP checks (n = 62), changed medications (n = 57), or provided non-pharmacologic counseling (n = 24) most often. Medication changes commonly included dose increases (n = 35) and additional agents (n = 17) for BP control. Spironolactone (n = 5) and thiazide diuretics (n = 5) were the most added medications. Conclusions: Most patients were willing to check their BP when provided with devices. The majority achieved a clinically significant decrease in home BP readings, demonstrating that pharmacist-driven home-monitoring programs can improve the optimization of hypertension regimens.

实施由药剂师管理的远程血压监测服务试点项目。
背景:临床医生在仅根据门诊血压(BP)读数调整降压药物时往往犹豫不决。获取家庭血压读数的限制因素包括血压计的使用和随访时提供准确可靠读数的能力。研究目的本研究探讨了与远程血压监测连接的在线平台是否能改善血压管理并促进药剂师采取有效的临床干预措施。研究方法研究人员招募了 30 名血压未得到控制的高血压患者,并为他们提供了家用远程血压监测仪。两名诊所药剂师对下载到在线平台的血压数据进行监测。药剂师要求患者每天检查血压(最多每天两次),并在 6 个月内大约每周给患者打电话。通过经批准的协议,药剂师对患者进行个性化干预,以改善患者护理。人口统计学和临床数据采用了描述性统计方法。结果显示纳入分析的 21 名患者的收缩压平均降低了 39 mmHg(IQR = 17-52.5)。目标血压为每周 5 次(n = 11)。在与患者的 261 次接触中,药剂师最常提出的要求是增加血压检查次数(62 次)、更换药物(57 次)或提供非药物咨询(24 次)。药物更换通常包括增加剂量(35 人)和增加控制血压的药物(17 人)。螺内酯(5 例)和噻嗪类利尿剂(5 例)是增加最多的药物。结论大多数患者在获得设备后都愿意检查血压。大多数患者的家庭血压读数都有明显的临床下降,这表明药剂师驱动的家庭监测计划可以改善高血压治疗方案的优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信