Visualisation and quantification of subcutaneous injections of different volumes, viscosities and injection rates: An ex-vivo micro-CT study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Joel Gresham, Gerard Bruin, Marie Picci, Karoline Bechtold-Peters, Thomas Dimke, Evan Davies, Kasia Błażejczyk, Wouter Willekens, Heleen Fehervary, Greetje Vande Velde
{"title":"Visualisation and quantification of subcutaneous injections of different volumes, viscosities and injection rates: An ex-vivo micro-CT study.","authors":"Joel Gresham, Gerard Bruin, Marie Picci, Karoline Bechtold-Peters, Thomas Dimke, Evan Davies, Kasia Błażejczyk, Wouter Willekens, Heleen Fehervary, Greetje Vande Velde","doi":"10.1016/j.xphs.2024.08.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effects of subcutaneous (SC) injection parameters such as drug formulation volume, viscosity and injection rate on therapeutic performance and tolerability have not been established for any drug product. In this study four groups of SC injections were performed on fresh ex vivo minipig abdominal tissue samples, varying volume (0.5-1 mL), viscosity (1-11 cP) and rate (0.02-0.1 mL/s). Micro-CT provided high resolution (50 micron) imaging of the SC tissues before and after injection, enabling a detailed 3D visualisation and analysis of how both injection parameters and tissue microstructure influence spatial distribution of injectables. We found that volume was the only significant factor for spatial distribution of injectate within our design space, and there were no significant factors for tissue backpressure. Variability within test groups was typically greater than differences between group means. Accordingly, whilst the higher viscosity formulations consistently exhibited reduced spatial distribution, the sample size was not large enough to establish confidence in this result. Comparing our findings to clinical evidence, we conclude that injection site and depth are more likely to influence PK and bioavailability than volume, viscosity and rate within our experimental space.</p>","PeriodicalId":16741,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmaceutical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmaceutical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2024.08.019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effects of subcutaneous (SC) injection parameters such as drug formulation volume, viscosity and injection rate on therapeutic performance and tolerability have not been established for any drug product. In this study four groups of SC injections were performed on fresh ex vivo minipig abdominal tissue samples, varying volume (0.5-1 mL), viscosity (1-11 cP) and rate (0.02-0.1 mL/s). Micro-CT provided high resolution (50 micron) imaging of the SC tissues before and after injection, enabling a detailed 3D visualisation and analysis of how both injection parameters and tissue microstructure influence spatial distribution of injectables. We found that volume was the only significant factor for spatial distribution of injectate within our design space, and there were no significant factors for tissue backpressure. Variability within test groups was typically greater than differences between group means. Accordingly, whilst the higher viscosity formulations consistently exhibited reduced spatial distribution, the sample size was not large enough to establish confidence in this result. Comparing our findings to clinical evidence, we conclude that injection site and depth are more likely to influence PK and bioavailability than volume, viscosity and rate within our experimental space.

不同体积、粘度和注射速度的皮下注射的可视化和量化:体外显微 CT 研究。
皮下注射(SC)参数(如药物配方体积、粘度和注射速度)对治疗效果和耐受性的影响尚未在任何药物产品中得到证实。本研究对新鲜的活体小鼠腹部组织样本进行了四组皮下注射,注射量(0.5-1 mL)、粘度(1-11 cP)和注射速度(0.02-0.1 mL/s)各不相同。显微计算机断层扫描提供了注射前后 SC 组织的高分辨率(50 微米)成像,实现了详细的三维可视化,并分析了注射参数和组织微观结构如何影响注射剂的空间分布。我们发现,在我们的设计空间内,体积是影响注射剂空间分布的唯一重要因素,而组织背压则没有重要因素。测试组内的变异通常大于组间平均值的差异。因此,虽然粘度较高的配方始终表现出较低的空间分布,但由于样本量不够大,无法确定这一结果的可信度。将我们的研究结果与临床证据进行比较后,我们得出结论:在我们的实验空间内,注射部位和深度比容量、粘度和速率更有可能影响 PK 和生物利用度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
367
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences will publish original research papers, original research notes, invited topical reviews (including Minireviews), and editorial commentary and news. The area of focus shall be concepts in basic pharmaceutical science and such topics as chemical processing of pharmaceuticals, including crystallization, lyophilization, chemical stability of drugs, pharmacokinetics, biopharmaceutics, pharmacodynamics, pro-drug developments, metabolic disposition of bioactive agents, dosage form design, protein-peptide chemistry and biotechnology specifically as these relate to pharmaceutical technology, and targeted drug delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信