Vaginal Packing After Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: Does the Soaking Agent Used for Packing (Bupivacaine, Estrogen or Saline) Impact Postoperative Pain Scores?

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of minimally invasive gynecology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2024.09.004
Humara Edell, Xinglin Li, Polina Myrox, Amanda Michael, Courtney Jolliffe, Tamara Abraham, Alex Kiss, Xingshan Cao, Louise-Helene Gagnon, Janet Bodley, Rose Kung, Patricia Lee
{"title":"Vaginal Packing After Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: Does the Soaking Agent Used for Packing (Bupivacaine, Estrogen or Saline) Impact Postoperative Pain Scores?","authors":"Humara Edell, Xinglin Li, Polina Myrox, Amanda Michael, Courtney Jolliffe, Tamara Abraham, Alex Kiss, Xingshan Cao, Louise-Helene Gagnon, Janet Bodley, Rose Kung, Patricia Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>Vaginal packing is traditionally placed after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery (PFRS) to prevent hematoma formation. We seek to determine if there is a difference in postoperative pain scores after PFRS if vaginal packing is soaked with estrogen cream, bupivacaine, or saline. The primary outcome was pain as measured by a visual analog scale at 2 hours, 6 hours, and 1 day postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include changes in hemoglobin, urinary retention and length of stay (LOS) in hospital.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care academic teaching hospital. All PFRS is performed by fellowship-trained urogynecologists.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Consenting patients undergoing PFRS.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>At the completion of surgery, gauze packing soaked with either estrogen cream, 0.25% bupivacaine with 1% epinephrine, or normal saline was placed inside the vagina and removed on postoperative day 1.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We included 210 patients (74 estrogen, 66 bupivacaine, 70 saline). There was no significant difference in mean postoperative pain scores between the groups (estrogen, bupivacaine, saline-soaked vaginal packs respectively) at 2 hours (2.66 ± 2.25, 2.30 ± 2.17, 2.24 ± 2.07; p = .4656), 6 hours (2.99 ± 2.38, 2.52 ± 2.30, 2.36 ± 2.01; p = .2181) or on postoperative day 1 (1.89 ± 2.01 vs 2.08 ± 2.15 vs 2.44 ± 2.19; p = .2832) as measured by visual analog scale scores (0-10). There was no difference in the secondary outcomes of change in pre/postoperative hemoglobin (21.8 ± 10.73g/L, 20.09 ± 11.55 g/L, 21.7 ± 9.62g/L, p = .68), urinary retention (37%, 45% and 48%, p = .45), LOS (1.05 ± 0.46 days, 1.02 ± 0.12, 1.03 ± 0.24, p = .97) or in-hospital opioid usage during admission (represented in morphine milligram equivalents [median (IQR1, IQR3)], Kruskal-Wallis test): 11.25 mg (0, 33), 7.5 mg (0, 22.5) and 15 mg (0, 33.88) p = .41.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no difference found between soaking vaginal packing with estrogen cream, bupivacaine, or saline after PFRS with respect to postoperative pain scores, LOS, in-hospital opioid usage, or urinary retention. Saline-soaked packing is an equivalent alternative to estrogen or bupivacaine vaginal packing.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"1050-1056"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2024.09.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: Vaginal packing is traditionally placed after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery (PFRS) to prevent hematoma formation. We seek to determine if there is a difference in postoperative pain scores after PFRS if vaginal packing is soaked with estrogen cream, bupivacaine, or saline. The primary outcome was pain as measured by a visual analog scale at 2 hours, 6 hours, and 1 day postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include changes in hemoglobin, urinary retention and length of stay (LOS) in hospital.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary care academic teaching hospital. All PFRS is performed by fellowship-trained urogynecologists.

Participants: Consenting patients undergoing PFRS.

Interventions: At the completion of surgery, gauze packing soaked with either estrogen cream, 0.25% bupivacaine with 1% epinephrine, or normal saline was placed inside the vagina and removed on postoperative day 1.

Measurements and main results: We included 210 patients (74 estrogen, 66 bupivacaine, 70 saline). There was no significant difference in mean postoperative pain scores between the groups (estrogen, bupivacaine, saline-soaked vaginal packs respectively) at 2 hours (2.66 ± 2.25, 2.30 ± 2.17, 2.24 ± 2.07; p = .4656), 6 hours (2.99 ± 2.38, 2.52 ± 2.30, 2.36 ± 2.01; p = .2181) or on postoperative day 1 (1.89 ± 2.01 vs 2.08 ± 2.15 vs 2.44 ± 2.19; p = .2832) as measured by visual analog scale scores (0-10). There was no difference in the secondary outcomes of change in pre/postoperative hemoglobin (21.8 ± 10.73g/L, 20.09 ± 11.55 g/L, 21.7 ± 9.62g/L, p = .68), urinary retention (37%, 45% and 48%, p = .45), LOS (1.05 ± 0.46 days, 1.02 ± 0.12, 1.03 ± 0.24, p = .97) or in-hospital opioid usage during admission (represented in morphine milligram equivalents [median (IQR1, IQR3)], Kruskal-Wallis test): 11.25 mg (0, 33), 7.5 mg (0, 22.5) and 15 mg (0, 33.88) p = .41.

Conclusion: There was no difference found between soaking vaginal packing with estrogen cream, bupivacaine, or saline after PFRS with respect to postoperative pain scores, LOS, in-hospital opioid usage, or urinary retention. Saline-soaked packing is an equivalent alternative to estrogen or bupivacaine vaginal packing.

盆底重建手术后的阴道填料:用于包裹的浸泡剂(布比卡因、雌激素或生理盐水)会影响术后疼痛评分吗?
研究目的传统上,盆底重建手术(PFRS)后会放置阴道填料,以防止血肿形成。我们试图确定,如果阴道填料浸泡在雌激素霜、布比卡因或生理盐水中,PFRS 术后疼痛评分是否会有差异。主要结果是术后 2 小时、6 小时和 1 天的视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 疼痛评分。次要结果包括血红蛋白、尿潴留和住院时间(LOS)的变化:前瞻性队列研究:设计:前瞻性队列研究所有 PFRS 均由接受过研究培训的泌尿妇科医生实施:干预措施:手术结束后,在阴道内放置浸有 0.25% 布比卡因加 1%肾上腺素的雌激素乳膏或生理盐水的纱布包,并在术后第 1 天取出:我们共收治了 210 例患者(雌激素 74 例、布比卡因 66 例、生理盐水 70 例)。各组(分别为雌激素组、布比卡因组、生理盐水浸泡阴道包组)术后 2 小时的平均疼痛评分无明显差异(2.66±2.25、2.30±2.17、2.24±2.17)。17、2.24±2.07;p=.4656)、6 小时(2.99±2.38、2.52±2.30、2.36±2.01;p=.2181)或术后第 1 天(1.89±2.01 vs. 2.08±2.15 vs. 2.44±2.19;p=.2832)时的 VAS 评分(0-10)。术前/术后血红蛋白变化(21.8±10.73g/L、20.09±11.55g/L、21.7±9.62g/L,P=.68)、尿潴留(37%、45% 和 48%,P=.45)、LOS(1.05±0.46 天,1.02±0.12,1.03±0.24,p=.97)或入院期间院内阿片类药物使用量(以吗啡毫克当量表示(中位数(IQR1,IQR3),Kruskal-Wallis 检验):11.25 毫克(0,33)、7.5 毫克(0,22.5)和 15 毫克(0,33.88),P =0.41:就术后疼痛评分、住院时间、院内阿片类药物使用量或尿潴留而言,PFRS 术后使用雌激素霜、布比卡因或生理盐水浸泡阴道填料没有差异。盐水浸泡阴道填料是雌激素或丁卡因阴道填料的同等替代品:临床试验注册:NCT03266926。注册时间:2017年2月1日。https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03266926。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信