Estimating the economic impact of blister-packaging on medication adherence and health care costs for a Medicare Advantage health plan.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Eric P Borrelli, Peter Saad, Nathan Barnes, Doina Dumitru, Julia D Lucaci
{"title":"Estimating the economic impact of blister-packaging on medication adherence and health care costs for a Medicare Advantage health plan.","authors":"Eric P Borrelli, Peter Saad, Nathan Barnes, Doina Dumitru, Julia D Lucaci","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2024.24179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication nonadherence is a persistent challenge in the United States, leading to increased health care resource utilization (HCRU) and health care costs and worsened health outcomes. Medicare Star Ratings is a program developed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to evaluate Medicare health plan quality and performance. Three of the Medicare Part D Star Ratings quality measures assess medication adherence, showing the importance CMS places on improving medication adherence in older adults. Although a variety of medication adherence-enhancing interventions are available to help promote adherence among patients, one intervention that has shown success historically is blister-packaging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To model the potential impact of blister-packaging chronic medications on HCRU and health care costs in the Medicare population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An economic model was developed to assess the potential impact of blister-packaging the 3 Medicare Star Ratings adherence measure medication classes: renin-angiotensin system antagonists (RASAs), statins, and noninsulin antidiabetics. The model perspective was that of a hypothetical Medicare Advantage health plan with a plan size of 100,000 members. A 12-month time horizon was used in the model. The dichotomous adherence threshold in the model was set at 80% or greater of the proportion of days covered (PDC). Literature-based references were used to inform both the impact of blister-packaging on the number of patients who become adherent as well as the impact of medication adherence on HCRU and health care costs for each of the medication classes. One-way sensitivity analyses and several scenario analyses were conducted to assess model uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Owing to increased adherence from the blister-packaging intervention, the hypothetical health plan in the analysis saw 776 additional members adherent to RASAs, 1,651 additional members adherent to statins, and 414 additional members adherent to oral antidiabetics. Although medication expenditure increased for all 3 medication classes (RASAs: $274,963; statins: $730,083; oral antidiabetics: $100,529), medical costs decreased across all classes (RASAs: -$4,098,848; statins: -$5,549,699; oral antidiabetics: -$917,968). Total net health care costs decreased by $3,823,885 for RASAs (-$3.19 per member per month [PMPM]), $4,819,616 for statins (-$4.02 PMPM), and $817,438 for oral antidiabetics (-$0.68 PMPM). The entire Medicare Advantage population scenario analysis saw reductions in total health care costs of $1,081,394,737 for RASAs, $1,362,987,376 for statins, and $231,171,496 for oral antidiabetics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dispensing chronic medications with blister-packaging for Medicare Advantage health plan patients was modeled to reduce HCRU and health care costs. Future studies are needed to assess whether the impact of blister-packaging medications is tied to reductions in HCRU and health care costs in real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"1442-1454"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.24179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medication nonadherence is a persistent challenge in the United States, leading to increased health care resource utilization (HCRU) and health care costs and worsened health outcomes. Medicare Star Ratings is a program developed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to evaluate Medicare health plan quality and performance. Three of the Medicare Part D Star Ratings quality measures assess medication adherence, showing the importance CMS places on improving medication adherence in older adults. Although a variety of medication adherence-enhancing interventions are available to help promote adherence among patients, one intervention that has shown success historically is blister-packaging.

Objective: To model the potential impact of blister-packaging chronic medications on HCRU and health care costs in the Medicare population.

Methods: An economic model was developed to assess the potential impact of blister-packaging the 3 Medicare Star Ratings adherence measure medication classes: renin-angiotensin system antagonists (RASAs), statins, and noninsulin antidiabetics. The model perspective was that of a hypothetical Medicare Advantage health plan with a plan size of 100,000 members. A 12-month time horizon was used in the model. The dichotomous adherence threshold in the model was set at 80% or greater of the proportion of days covered (PDC). Literature-based references were used to inform both the impact of blister-packaging on the number of patients who become adherent as well as the impact of medication adherence on HCRU and health care costs for each of the medication classes. One-way sensitivity analyses and several scenario analyses were conducted to assess model uncertainty.

Results: Owing to increased adherence from the blister-packaging intervention, the hypothetical health plan in the analysis saw 776 additional members adherent to RASAs, 1,651 additional members adherent to statins, and 414 additional members adherent to oral antidiabetics. Although medication expenditure increased for all 3 medication classes (RASAs: $274,963; statins: $730,083; oral antidiabetics: $100,529), medical costs decreased across all classes (RASAs: -$4,098,848; statins: -$5,549,699; oral antidiabetics: -$917,968). Total net health care costs decreased by $3,823,885 for RASAs (-$3.19 per member per month [PMPM]), $4,819,616 for statins (-$4.02 PMPM), and $817,438 for oral antidiabetics (-$0.68 PMPM). The entire Medicare Advantage population scenario analysis saw reductions in total health care costs of $1,081,394,737 for RASAs, $1,362,987,376 for statins, and $231,171,496 for oral antidiabetics.

Conclusions: Dispensing chronic medications with blister-packaging for Medicare Advantage health plan patients was modeled to reduce HCRU and health care costs. Future studies are needed to assess whether the impact of blister-packaging medications is tied to reductions in HCRU and health care costs in real-world settings.

估算泡罩包装对医疗保险优势保健计划的用药依从性和医疗成本的经济影响。
背景:在美国,不遵医嘱用药是一项长期存在的挑战,会导致医疗资源利用率(HCRU)和医疗成本增加,并使健康状况恶化。联邦医疗保险星级评定是由联邦医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)制定的一项计划,旨在评估联邦医疗保险医疗计划的质量和绩效。在联邦医疗保险 D 部分星级评定的质量衡量标准中,有三项对用药依从性进行了评估,这表明了 CMS 对改善老年人用药依从性的重视。尽管有多种提高用药依从性的干预措施可帮助促进患者的用药依从性,但泡罩包装这一干预措施在历史上曾取得过成功:目的:模拟泡罩包装慢性药物对医疗保险人群 HCRU 和医疗成本的潜在影响:我们建立了一个经济模型,以评估对肾素-血管紧张素系统拮抗剂 (RASAs)、他汀类药物和非胰岛素类抗糖尿病药物这 3 类医疗保险星级评定依从性测量药物进行泡罩包装的潜在影响。模型的视角是一个假设的医疗保险优势医疗计划,计划规模为 100,000 名成员。模型的时间跨度为 12 个月。模型中的二分法依从性阈值设定为覆盖天数比例 (PDC) 的 80% 或更高。泡罩包装对坚持用药的患者人数的影响,以及坚持用药对 HCRU 和每类药品的医疗成本的影响,均采用了文献参考资料。为了评估模型的不确定性,我们进行了单向敏感性分析和几种情景分析:结果:由于泡罩包装干预措施提高了依从性,分析中的假定医疗保险计划增加了 776 名 RASA 依从性成员、1651 名他汀类药物依从性成员和 414 名口服抗糖尿病药物依从性成员。虽然所有 3 类药物的用药支出都有所增加(RASAs:274,963 美元;他汀类药物:730,083 美元;口服抗糖尿病药物:100,529 美元),但所有类别的医疗费用都有所下降(RASAs:-4,098,848 美元;他汀类药物:-5,549,699 美元;口服抗糖尿病药物:-917,968 美元)。RASAs 的总医疗费用净额减少了 3,823,885 美元(每名会员每月减少 3.19 美元),他汀类药物减少了 4,819,616 美元(每名会员每月减少 4.02 美元),口服抗糖尿病药物减少了 817,438 美元(每名会员每月减少 0.68 美元)。在整个医疗保险优势人群情景分析中,RASA 的医疗费用总额减少了 1,081,394,737 美元,他汀类药物减少了 1,362,987,376 美元,口服抗糖尿病药减少了 231,171,496 美元:为医疗保险优势健康计划患者配发泡罩包装慢性药物的模型可降低 HCRU 和医疗费用。未来还需要开展研究,以评估泡罩包装药物的影响是否与实际环境中 HCRU 和医疗费用的降低相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信