Examining the Impact of Certificate of Need Laws on the Utilization and Reimbursement of Cataract Surgeries Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

IF 2.3 Q2 ECONOMICS
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2024-08-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36469/001c.121618
Alvina Liang, Jennifer L Lindsey
{"title":"Examining the Impact of Certificate of Need Laws on the Utilization and Reimbursement of Cataract Surgeries Among Medicare Beneficiaries.","authors":"Alvina Liang, Jennifer L Lindsey","doi":"10.36469/001c.121618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cataract surgery is an effective and commonly utilized procedure and can significantly improve quality of life and restore economic productivity. Certificate of need (CON) laws aim to regulate healthcare facility expansion and equipment acquisition to curtail costs, enhance quality, and ensure equitable access to care. However, little is known about the impact of CON laws on cataract surgery utilization and reimbursement. <b>Objectives:</b> To compare utilization and reimbursement for non-complex cataract surgery in CON and non-CON states. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective database review analyzed publicly available data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services from 2017 to 2021 to identify the Medicare beneficiaries who underwent non-complex cataract surgery using Current Procedural Terminology code 66984 in Medicare outpatient hospitals. Utilization and reimbursement patterns were analyzed in states with and without CON laws using the compound annual growth rate, with reimbursement adjusted by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index. <b>Results:</b> The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reported 893 682 non-complex cataract surgeries in the study period; of these, 609 237 were in CON and 280 215 in non-CON states. Inflation-adjusted reimbursement increased in both CON (1.17%) and non-CON (1.83%) states, while the reimbursement in non-CON states was greater than the national average adjusted reimbursement (1.67%). Utilization of non-complex cataract surgery declined during the study period in both CON and non-CON states. A larger decline in utilization was observed in CON states (-7.32%) than in non-CON states (-6.49%). Utilization was slightly higher in non-CON than in CON states for each year except 2019. <b>Discussion:</b> Utilization of non-complex cataract surgery by Medicare beneficiaries declined over the study period in both CON and non-CON states, possibly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Inflation-adjusted reimbursement adjusted for Consumer Price Index increased more in non-CON than CON states, possibly reflecting shifts in market dynamics in CON-regulated states. <b>Conclusions:</b> Surgeons and policymakers should consider the implications of CON laws on the utilization and reimbursement of cataract surgery. Further study is necessary to ascertain whether these trends persist beyond 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"11 2","pages":"35-40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.121618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cataract surgery is an effective and commonly utilized procedure and can significantly improve quality of life and restore economic productivity. Certificate of need (CON) laws aim to regulate healthcare facility expansion and equipment acquisition to curtail costs, enhance quality, and ensure equitable access to care. However, little is known about the impact of CON laws on cataract surgery utilization and reimbursement. Objectives: To compare utilization and reimbursement for non-complex cataract surgery in CON and non-CON states. Methods: This retrospective database review analyzed publicly available data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services from 2017 to 2021 to identify the Medicare beneficiaries who underwent non-complex cataract surgery using Current Procedural Terminology code 66984 in Medicare outpatient hospitals. Utilization and reimbursement patterns were analyzed in states with and without CON laws using the compound annual growth rate, with reimbursement adjusted by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index. Results: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reported 893 682 non-complex cataract surgeries in the study period; of these, 609 237 were in CON and 280 215 in non-CON states. Inflation-adjusted reimbursement increased in both CON (1.17%) and non-CON (1.83%) states, while the reimbursement in non-CON states was greater than the national average adjusted reimbursement (1.67%). Utilization of non-complex cataract surgery declined during the study period in both CON and non-CON states. A larger decline in utilization was observed in CON states (-7.32%) than in non-CON states (-6.49%). Utilization was slightly higher in non-CON than in CON states for each year except 2019. Discussion: Utilization of non-complex cataract surgery by Medicare beneficiaries declined over the study period in both CON and non-CON states, possibly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Inflation-adjusted reimbursement adjusted for Consumer Price Index increased more in non-CON than CON states, possibly reflecting shifts in market dynamics in CON-regulated states. Conclusions: Surgeons and policymakers should consider the implications of CON laws on the utilization and reimbursement of cataract surgery. Further study is necessary to ascertain whether these trends persist beyond 2021.

研究需求证明法对医疗保险受益人白内障手术的使用和报销的影响。
背景:白内障手术是一种有效且常用的手术,可显著提高生活质量并恢复经济生产力。需求证明(CON)法旨在规范医疗设施的扩建和设备的购置,以降低成本、提高质量并确保公平获得医疗服务。然而,人们对需求证明法对白内障手术使用和报销的影响知之甚少。目标:比较 CON 州和非 CON 州非复杂白内障手术的利用率和报销情况。方法:这项回顾性数据库审查分析了美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心 2017 年至 2021 年的公开数据,以确定在医疗保险门诊医院使用当前程序术语代码 66984 接受非复杂性白内障手术的医疗保险受益人。使用复合年增长率分析了有和没有 CON 法律的州的使用和报销模式,报销额根据美国劳工统计局的消费者价格指数进行了调整。研究结果在研究期间,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心报告了 893 682 例非复杂性白内障手术,其中 609 237 例发生在有 CON 法的州,280 215 例发生在无 CON 法的州。经通货膨胀调整后,CON 州(1.17%)和非 CON 州(1.83%)的报销额度均有所增长,而非 CON 州的报销额度高于全国平均调整报销额度(1.67%)。在研究期间,非复杂性白内障手术的使用率在有条件州和无条件州都有所下降。与非白内障州(-6.49%)相比,白内障州的使用率下降幅度更大(-7.32%)。除 2019 年外,其他年份的使用率在非 CON 州均略高于 CON 州。讨论:在研究期间,CON 州和非 CON 州医疗保险受益人的非复杂性白内障手术使用率均有所下降,这可能是受到 COVID-19 大流行的影响。根据消费者物价指数调整后的通胀补偿在非CON州比CON州增加得更多,这可能反映了CON管制州市场动态的变化。结论:外科医生和政策制定者应考虑 CON 法律对白内障手术的使用和报销的影响。有必要进行进一步研究,以确定这些趋势是否会持续到 2021 年以后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信