Psychometric analysis of the quiet quitting and quiet firing scale among Turkish healthcare professionals.

IF 2.1 4区医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1111/jep.14136

Ayse Karadas, Celalettin Çevik

{"title":"Psychometric analysis of the quiet quitting and quiet firing scale among Turkish healthcare professionals.","authors":"Ayse Karadas, Celalettin Çevik","doi":"10.1111/jep.14136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the risk of quiet quitting among healthcare professionals is increasing. Individuals who engage in the quiet quitting process may also unknowingly become the target of quiet firing. The concepts of quiet quitting and quiet firing play a crucial role in promoting employee resilience and preventing organizational losses.Method: This study aimed to conduct a validity and reliability analysis of the quiet quitting and quiet firing scale (QQ and QF scale) in Turkish. A methodological study was conducted with 445 healthcare professionals.Results: The item-total score correlation values ranged between 0.37 and 0.76. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a 14-item, two-factor structure. Cronbach's ⍺ internal consistency coefficient was 0.89. The QQ and QF scale had a strong negative correlation with the person-organization fit scale and the happiness at work scale subscales of engagement, job satisfaction and affective organizational commitment.Conclusion: The results showed that the adapted version of the QQ and QF scale was valid and suitable for use in Turkey.","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the risk of quiet quitting among healthcare professionals is increasing. Individuals who engage in the quiet quitting process may also unknowingly become the target of quiet firing. The concepts of quiet quitting and quiet firing play a crucial role in promoting employee resilience and preventing organizational losses.

Method: This study aimed to conduct a validity and reliability analysis of the quiet quitting and quiet firing scale (QQ and QF scale) in Turkish. A methodological study was conducted with 445 healthcare professionals.

Results: The item-total score correlation values ranged between 0.37 and 0.76. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a 14-item, two-factor structure. Cronbach's ⍺ internal consistency coefficient was 0.89. The QQ and QF scale had a strong negative correlation with the person-organization fit scale and the happiness at work scale subscales of engagement, job satisfaction and affective organizational commitment.

Conclusion: The results showed that the adapted version of the QQ and QF scale was valid and suitable for use in Turkey.

查看原文本刊更多论文

土耳其医护人员安静戒烟和安静开火量表的心理计量分析。

背景：由于 COVID-19 大流行的影响，医疗保健专业人员悄悄辞职的风险正在增加。参与静默辞职过程的个人也可能在不知不觉中成为被静默解雇的对象。静默辞职和静默解雇的概念在促进员工复原力和防止组织损失方面发挥着至关重要的作用：本研究旨在对土耳其语的安静辞职和安静解雇量表（QQ 和 QF 量表）进行有效性和可靠性分析。对 445 名医疗保健专业人员进行了方法学研究：结果：项目-总分相关值介于 0.37 和 0.76 之间。确认性因子分析证实了 14 个项目的双因子结构。Cronbach's ⍺ 内部一致性系数为 0.89。QQ 和 QF 量表与人-组织契合度量表以及工作幸福感量表的参与度、工作满意度和情感性组织承诺分量表呈强负相关：结果表明，改编版的 QQ 和 QF 量表是有效的，适合在土耳其使用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 医学-卫生保健

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

4.20%

发文量

143

审稿时长

3-8 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.