Efficacy of Self-Natural Posture Exercise (SNPE) programs on chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled feasibility trial with waitlist control.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Aria Son, James Johnson, Jennifer Leachman, Joseph Bloyder, Jeannine M Brant
{"title":"Efficacy of Self-Natural Posture Exercise (SNPE) programs on chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled feasibility trial with waitlist control.","authors":"Aria Son, James Johnson, Jennifer Leachman, Joseph Bloyder, Jeannine M Brant","doi":"10.3233/BMR-230441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is a significant source of disability and decreased quality of life. The Self-Natural Posture Exercise (SNPE) intervention can be used effectively in many cases, but feasibility and impact has not been fully explored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study explores the feasibility and efficacy of face-to-face (FtF) and virtual (Vir) SNPE programs on chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a randomized single-blinded waitlist control study with 10 participants in the FtF group (age 45.8 ± 2.89) and 9 in the Vir group (age 52.2 ± 2.3). Participants had low to moderate low back pain for > 3 months. Those who would eventually become the Vir group served initially as a waitlist control (Con) group. The FtF group received 12 weeks of in-person exercise training sessions conducted and the Vir group received weekly recorded training videos created by and featuring the same instructor. Measured outcomes included feasibility assessed by rate of retention and rate of attendance, level of low back pain (Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analogue Scale), quality of life (36-Item Short Form Health Survey 1.0), muscular pressure pain threshold, and muscle tone. Analysis was done via repeated measures ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rates of retention were 80% in the FtF group and 78% in the Vir group. Attendance rates were 88% in the FtF group and 60% in the Vir group. ODI, VAS, and some SF-36 domains improved in both the FtF and Vir groups. Overall, the FtF group improved in more domains and by a larger degree than the Vir group and both groups improved relative to Con.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 12-week SNPE program, done virtually or in person, shows promise in improving ODI, VAS, and some SF-36 domains. FtF appears to be more effective. Future studies would benefit from sampling a larger and more diverse population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-230441","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a significant source of disability and decreased quality of life. The Self-Natural Posture Exercise (SNPE) intervention can be used effectively in many cases, but feasibility and impact has not been fully explored.

Objective: The current study explores the feasibility and efficacy of face-to-face (FtF) and virtual (Vir) SNPE programs on chronic low back pain.

Methods: This is a randomized single-blinded waitlist control study with 10 participants in the FtF group (age 45.8 ± 2.89) and 9 in the Vir group (age 52.2 ± 2.3). Participants had low to moderate low back pain for > 3 months. Those who would eventually become the Vir group served initially as a waitlist control (Con) group. The FtF group received 12 weeks of in-person exercise training sessions conducted and the Vir group received weekly recorded training videos created by and featuring the same instructor. Measured outcomes included feasibility assessed by rate of retention and rate of attendance, level of low back pain (Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analogue Scale), quality of life (36-Item Short Form Health Survey 1.0), muscular pressure pain threshold, and muscle tone. Analysis was done via repeated measures ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests.

Results: Rates of retention were 80% in the FtF group and 78% in the Vir group. Attendance rates were 88% in the FtF group and 60% in the Vir group. ODI, VAS, and some SF-36 domains improved in both the FtF and Vir groups. Overall, the FtF group improved in more domains and by a larger degree than the Vir group and both groups improved relative to Con.

Conclusion: A 12-week SNPE program, done virtually or in person, shows promise in improving ODI, VAS, and some SF-36 domains. FtF appears to be more effective. Future studies would benefit from sampling a larger and more diverse population.

自我自然姿势锻炼(SNPE)计划对慢性腰背痛的疗效:随机对照可行性试验与候补名单对照。
背景:腰背痛(LBP)是导致残疾和生活质量下降的重要原因。自我自然姿势锻炼(SNPE)干预在许多病例中都可有效使用,但其可行性和影响尚未得到充分探讨:本研究探讨了面对面(FtF)和虚拟(Vir)SNPE 项目对慢性腰背痛的可行性和疗效:这是一项随机单盲候补对照研究,FtF 组有 10 名参与者(年龄为 45.8 ± 2.89),Vir 组有 9 名参与者(年龄为 52.2 ± 2.3)。参与者患有低度至中度腰痛,持续时间超过 3 个月。最终成为 Vir 组的人最初作为候补对照组(Con)。FtF 组接受为期 12 周的面对面运动训练课程,Vir 组则每周接受由同一教练制作并主讲的录制训练视频。测量结果包括通过保留率和出席率评估可行性、腰痛程度(Oswestry 残疾指数、视觉模拟量表)、生活质量(36 项简表健康调查 1.0)、肌肉压痛阈值和肌肉张力。通过重复测量方差分析和 Wilcoxon 检验进行分析:FtF组的保留率为80%,Vir组为78%。FtF 组的出勤率为 88%,Vir 组为 60%。FtF组和Vir组的ODI、VAS和某些SF-36领域均有所改善。总体而言,FtF 组比 Vir 组在更多领域和更大程度上有所改善,两组相对于 Con 组都有所改善:结论:为期 12 周的 SNPE 计划(虚拟或面对面)有望改善 ODI、VAS 和一些 SF-36 领域。FtF似乎更为有效。未来的研究将受益于更大规模和更多样化的人群取样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信