A Basis for Strengthening Coping Strategies and Treatment Expectations in Patients Undergoing Emetogenic Pelvic-Abdominal Radiotherapy: A Longitudinal Study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Anna Efverman, Marja-Leena Kristofferzon
{"title":"A Basis for Strengthening Coping Strategies and Treatment Expectations in Patients Undergoing Emetogenic Pelvic-Abdominal Radiotherapy: A Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Anna Efverman, Marja-Leena Kristofferzon","doi":"10.1177/15347354241281329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To study the relationship between coping strategies and nausea during emetogenic pelvic-abdominal radiotherapy, and to describe the patients' rationales for their expectations regarding nausea. <b>Methods:</b> Patients (n = 200: 84% women, mean age 64 years, 69% had gynecological, 27% colorectal, and 4% had other malignances) longitudinally participated during pelvic-abdominal radiotherapy. We measured adopted coping strategies using the Mental Adjustment to Cancer scale and the patients' rationales for their expectations regarding nausea at baseline. The patients registered nausea and vomiting daily during the radiotherapy period (mean 36 + Standard Deviation 10 days). <b>Results:</b> Patients who experienced nausea (n = 128, 64%) during the radiotherapy period graded a lower score on \"Fighting Spirit\" (median, md, score 51, P = .031) and a higher score on \"anxious preoccupation\" (md 18, P = .040) compared to patients who did not experience nausea (n = 72, 36%), md 54 and md 17. More of the patients for whom \"Helpless-Hopeless\" represented the most predominant response experienced nausea (100%) or vomited (56%) compared to patients adopting \"Fighting Spirit\": 62% experienced nausea (P = .011) and 20% vomited (P = .014). Only four (6%) of the nausea-free patients had expected themselves to be at increased risk for nausea. Of the patients who became nauseous, 22 (17%) patients had expected themselves to be at increased risk for nausea (P = .017), based on previous experience. <b>Conclusion</b>: Patients adopting maladaptive coping strategies or patients expecting nausea based on previous experiences, were more likely to experience nausea than other patients when undergoing emetogenic pelvic-abdominal radiotherapy. Cancer care professionals may identify patients adopting maladaptive coping strategies or having high nausea expectations by applying the MAC scale and self-assessment of expected nausea risk and guide these patients to adopt adaptive coping strategies and strengthen their expectations on successful prevention of nausea.Trial registration number: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00621660.</p>","PeriodicalId":13734,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Cancer Therapies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418353/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Cancer Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354241281329","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To study the relationship between coping strategies and nausea during emetogenic pelvic-abdominal radiotherapy, and to describe the patients' rationales for their expectations regarding nausea. Methods: Patients (n = 200: 84% women, mean age 64 years, 69% had gynecological, 27% colorectal, and 4% had other malignances) longitudinally participated during pelvic-abdominal radiotherapy. We measured adopted coping strategies using the Mental Adjustment to Cancer scale and the patients' rationales for their expectations regarding nausea at baseline. The patients registered nausea and vomiting daily during the radiotherapy period (mean 36 + Standard Deviation 10 days). Results: Patients who experienced nausea (n = 128, 64%) during the radiotherapy period graded a lower score on "Fighting Spirit" (median, md, score 51, P = .031) and a higher score on "anxious preoccupation" (md 18, P = .040) compared to patients who did not experience nausea (n = 72, 36%), md 54 and md 17. More of the patients for whom "Helpless-Hopeless" represented the most predominant response experienced nausea (100%) or vomited (56%) compared to patients adopting "Fighting Spirit": 62% experienced nausea (P = .011) and 20% vomited (P = .014). Only four (6%) of the nausea-free patients had expected themselves to be at increased risk for nausea. Of the patients who became nauseous, 22 (17%) patients had expected themselves to be at increased risk for nausea (P = .017), based on previous experience. Conclusion: Patients adopting maladaptive coping strategies or patients expecting nausea based on previous experiences, were more likely to experience nausea than other patients when undergoing emetogenic pelvic-abdominal radiotherapy. Cancer care professionals may identify patients adopting maladaptive coping strategies or having high nausea expectations by applying the MAC scale and self-assessment of expected nausea risk and guide these patients to adopt adaptive coping strategies and strengthen their expectations on successful prevention of nausea.Trial registration number: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00621660.

加强盆腔腹腔放疗患者的应对策略和治疗期望的基础:纵向研究。
研究目的研究致吐性盆腔腹部放疗期间的应对策略与恶心之间的关系,并描述患者对恶心的预期理由。研究方法患者(n = 200:84% 为女性,平均年龄 64 岁,69% 患有妇科疾病,27% 患有结肠直肠疾病,4% 患有其他恶性肿瘤)在盆腹腔放疗期间进行了纵向参与。我们使用癌症心理适应量表测量了患者采取的应对策略,以及患者在基线时对恶心的预期理由。患者在放疗期间(平均 36 天 + 标准差 10 天)每天都会出现恶心和呕吐症状。结果显示与未出现恶心症状的患者(n = 72,占 36%)相比,在放疗期间出现恶心症状的患者(n = 128,占 64%)在 "战斗精神 "方面的得分较低(中位数,md,51 分,P = .031),而在 "焦虑臆想 "方面的得分较高(中位数,md,18 分,P = .040),中位数分别为 54 分和 17 分。与采用 "战斗精神 "的患者相比,以 "无助-无望 "为最主要反应的患者中有更多的人出现恶心(100%)或呕吐(56%):62% 的患者出现恶心(P = 0.011),20% 的患者出现呕吐(P = 0.014)。在没有恶心症状的患者中,只有 4 人(6%)预计自己恶心的风险会增加。在出现恶心症状的患者中,有 22 名(17%)患者根据以往的经验预计自己的恶心风险会增加(P = .017)。结论采用适应不良应对策略的患者或根据以往经验预计会出现恶心症状的患者在接受致吐性盆腔腹部放疗时比其他患者更容易出现恶心症状。癌症护理专业人员可通过应用MAC量表和预期恶心风险的自我评估来识别采用适应性不良应对策略或有较高恶心预期的患者,并指导这些患者采用适应性应对策略,加强他们对成功预防恶心的预期:试验注册号:Clinicaltrials.gov:试验注册号:Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00621660。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Integrative Cancer Therapies
Integrative Cancer Therapies 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ICT is the first journal to spearhead and focus on a new and growing movement in cancer treatment. The journal emphasizes scientific understanding of alternative medicine and traditional medicine therapies, and their responsible integration with conventional health care. Integrative care includes therapeutic interventions in diet, lifestyle, exercise, stress care, and nutritional supplements, as well as experimental vaccines, chrono-chemotherapy, and other advanced treatments. Contributors are leading oncologists, researchers, nurses, and health-care professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信