Phase II study of pegaspargase, etoposide, gemcitabine (PEG) followed by involved-field radiation therapy in early-stage extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Hematology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1080/16078454.2024.2402102
Demei Feng, Zhimin Yan, Bibo Fu, Shenrui Bai, Lewei Zhu, Robert Peter Gale, Zhongjun Xia, Yang Liang, Hua Wang
{"title":"Phase II study of pegaspargase, etoposide, gemcitabine (PEG) followed by involved-field radiation therapy in early-stage extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma.","authors":"Demei Feng, Zhimin Yan, Bibo Fu, Shenrui Bai, Lewei Zhu, Robert Peter Gale, Zhongjun Xia, Yang Liang, Hua Wang","doi":"10.1080/16078454.2024.2402102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The prognosis of extra-nodal NK/T cell lymphoma (ENKTL) is poor, and the optimal therapy remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new combined modality therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Phase-2 study of pegaspargase, etoposide and gemcitabine (PEG) combined with involved field radiation therapy (IFRT) in newly-diagnosed patients with early-stage ENKTL. Patients received 4 course of PEG followed by IFRT. The primary endpoints were complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and objective response rate (ORR) after IFRT. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>34 consecutive patients with Ann Arbor stage I/II were enrolled. 3 patients progressed on PEG, while the remaining 31 received IFRT. The ORR was 88.2% (30/34), included 28 (82.4%) complete and 2 (5.8%) partial responses. With a median follow-up of 56.0 months (Interquartile Range [IQR], 36.0-66.9 months), the estimated 5-year PFS and OS were 87.4% (95% Confidence Interval [CI],69.5%-94.8%) and 97.1% (95%CI, 80.1%-99.6%), respectively. Most adverse events were hematological and easily managed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PEG followed by IFRT is a safe and effective initial therapy for early-stage ENKTL, demonstrating impressive PFS and OS rates. This promising approach warrants further validation in a randomized controlled trial (Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02705508).<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02705508.</p>","PeriodicalId":13161,"journal":{"name":"Hematology","volume":"29 1","pages":"2402102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16078454.2024.2402102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The prognosis of extra-nodal NK/T cell lymphoma (ENKTL) is poor, and the optimal therapy remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new combined modality therapy.

Methods: Phase-2 study of pegaspargase, etoposide and gemcitabine (PEG) combined with involved field radiation therapy (IFRT) in newly-diagnosed patients with early-stage ENKTL. Patients received 4 course of PEG followed by IFRT. The primary endpoints were complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and objective response rate (ORR) after IFRT. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events.

Results: 34 consecutive patients with Ann Arbor stage I/II were enrolled. 3 patients progressed on PEG, while the remaining 31 received IFRT. The ORR was 88.2% (30/34), included 28 (82.4%) complete and 2 (5.8%) partial responses. With a median follow-up of 56.0 months (Interquartile Range [IQR], 36.0-66.9 months), the estimated 5-year PFS and OS were 87.4% (95% Confidence Interval [CI],69.5%-94.8%) and 97.1% (95%CI, 80.1%-99.6%), respectively. Most adverse events were hematological and easily managed.

Conclusions: PEG followed by IFRT is a safe and effective initial therapy for early-stage ENKTL, demonstrating impressive PFS and OS rates. This promising approach warrants further validation in a randomized controlled trial (Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02705508).Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02705508.

对早期结节外自然杀伤/T细胞淋巴瘤进行的聚合酶、依托泊苷、吉西他滨(PEG)和介入场放射治疗的II期研究。
目的:结外NK/T细胞淋巴瘤(ENKTL)的预后较差,最佳疗法仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估一种新的联合疗法的安全性和有效性:方法:对新诊断的早期ENKTL患者进行培加司琼、依托泊苷和吉西他滨(PEG)联合介入放射治疗(IFRT)的2期研究。患者先接受4个疗程的PEG治疗,然后接受IFRT治疗。主要终点是IFRT后的完全反应(CR)、部分反应(PR)和客观反应率(ORR)。次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和不良事件:34名连续的安娜堡I/II期患者入选。3名患者在接受PEG治疗后病情进展,其余31名患者接受了IFRT治疗。ORR为88.2%(30/34),包括28例(82.4%)完全反应和2例(5.8%)部分反应。中位随访时间为56.0个月(四分位间范围[IQR],36.0-66.9个月),估计5年PFS和OS分别为87.4%(95%置信区间[CI],69.5%-94.8%)和97.1%(95%置信区间[CI],80.1%-99.6%)。大多数不良反应为血液学不良反应,易于处理:结论:PEG 后 IFRT 是一种安全有效的早期 ENKTL 初始疗法,其 PFS 和 OS 率令人印象深刻。这一前景广阔的方法值得在随机对照试验中进一步验证(注册于 Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02705508):试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT02705508.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hematology
Hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
140
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Hematology is an international journal publishing original and review articles in the field of general hematology, including oncology, pathology, biology, clinical research and epidemiology. Of the fixed sections, annotations are accepted on any general or scientific field: technical annotations covering current laboratory practice in general hematology, blood transfusion and clinical trials, and current clinical practice reviews the consensus driven areas of care and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信