Clinical Impact of the CARMENA Trial on Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Practices in the USA: A Difference-in-differences Analysis.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Anna Geduldig, Jackson Schmidt, Jacob Grassauer, Wesley Chou, Nicholas H Chakiryan
{"title":"Clinical Impact of the CARMENA Trial on Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Practices in the USA: A Difference-in-differences Analysis.","authors":"Anna Geduldig, Jackson Schmidt, Jacob Grassauer, Wesley Chou, Nicholas H Chakiryan","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>It is unclear whether cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) practices have changed in the USA after the publication of the Cancer du Rein Métastatique Nephrectomie et Antiangiogéniques (CARMENA) trial in 2018. Our primary objective is to determine the effect of the CARMENA trial on CN rates in the USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were identified in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2020. A quasiexperimental difference-in-differences analysis was used to test the primary outcome, as follows: the change in CN rate was assessed among metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients diagnosed before versus after 2018, while using the localized nephrectomy (LN) rate performed in the setting of nonmetastatic ccRCC as a control group.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The difference-in-differences analysis identified a statistically significant decrease in CN rate after CARMENA (β-coefficient [standard error]: -0.06 [0.025], p = 0.028), with a 10.2% absolute and a 31.8% relative rate reduction when compared with the counterfactual (expected) value (34.7% → 21.9% [actual] vs 32.1% [expected]). Primarily, relative differences in CN and LN rates before and after 2018 may be attributable to additional factors, aside from CARMENA publication, not tested in this quasiexperimental model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>CN rates decreased significantly after the publication of the CARMENA trial in 2018, with a minimal difference in regional or demographic practice patterns. Overall, the publication of the CARMENA trial results is seemingly associated with substantial alteration of clinical practice in the USA, with relatively broad and nonspecific adoption across facilities, regions, and demographics.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>For decades, the immediate surgical removal of the kidney tumor (cytoreductive nephrectomy) was a mainstay of metastatic kidney cancer treatment. In 2018, the CARMENA study showed that patients treated with systemic therapy alone had similar outcomes to patients who underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy first. In this study, we show that fewer cytoreductive nephrectomies were performed after the CARMENA trial results were published.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.09.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: It is unclear whether cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) practices have changed in the USA after the publication of the Cancer du Rein Métastatique Nephrectomie et Antiangiogéniques (CARMENA) trial in 2018. Our primary objective is to determine the effect of the CARMENA trial on CN rates in the USA.

Methods: Patients were identified in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2020. A quasiexperimental difference-in-differences analysis was used to test the primary outcome, as follows: the change in CN rate was assessed among metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients diagnosed before versus after 2018, while using the localized nephrectomy (LN) rate performed in the setting of nonmetastatic ccRCC as a control group.

Key findings and limitations: The difference-in-differences analysis identified a statistically significant decrease in CN rate after CARMENA (β-coefficient [standard error]: -0.06 [0.025], p = 0.028), with a 10.2% absolute and a 31.8% relative rate reduction when compared with the counterfactual (expected) value (34.7% → 21.9% [actual] vs 32.1% [expected]). Primarily, relative differences in CN and LN rates before and after 2018 may be attributable to additional factors, aside from CARMENA publication, not tested in this quasiexperimental model.

Conclusions and clinical implications: CN rates decreased significantly after the publication of the CARMENA trial in 2018, with a minimal difference in regional or demographic practice patterns. Overall, the publication of the CARMENA trial results is seemingly associated with substantial alteration of clinical practice in the USA, with relatively broad and nonspecific adoption across facilities, regions, and demographics.

Patient summary: For decades, the immediate surgical removal of the kidney tumor (cytoreductive nephrectomy) was a mainstay of metastatic kidney cancer treatment. In 2018, the CARMENA study showed that patients treated with systemic therapy alone had similar outcomes to patients who underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy first. In this study, we show that fewer cytoreductive nephrectomies were performed after the CARMENA trial results were published.

CARMENA 试验对美国肾切除术的临床影响:差异分析。
背景和目的:目前尚不清楚在2018年公布Cancer du Rein Métastatique Nephrectomie et Antiangiogéniques(CARMENA)试验后,美国的细胞切除肾切除术(CN)实践是否发生了变化。我们的主要目标是确定CARMENA试验对美国CN率的影响:从 2004 年至 2020 年的美国国家癌症数据库中识别患者。采用准实验性差异分析来检验主要结果,具体如下:评估2018年之前和之后确诊的转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)患者的CN率变化,同时将非转移性ccRCC的局部肾切除术(LN)率作为对照组:差异分析发现,CARMENA 后的 CN 率出现了统计学意义上的显著下降(β系数[标准误差]:-0.06 [0.025],p = 0.028),与反事实(预期)值(34.7% → 21.9% [实际] vs 32.1% [预期])相比,绝对率下降了 10.2%,相对率下降了 31.8%。2018年前后CN和LN发病率的相对差异主要可能归因于除CARMENA发表以外的其他因素,而这些因素并未在该准实验模型中进行测试:2018年CARMENA试验发表后,CN率明显下降,地区或人口实践模式差异极小。总体而言,CARMENA 试验结果的公布似乎与美国临床实践的实质性改变有关,不同机构、地区和人口统计学中的采用相对广泛且不具特异性:几十年来,立即手术切除肾脏肿瘤(细胞肾切除术)是转移性肾癌治疗的主要方法。2018年,CARMENA研究显示,单纯接受全身治疗的患者与先接受细胞肾切除术的患者疗效相似。在本研究中,我们发现在CARMENA试验结果公布后,进行细胞修复性肾切除术的患者减少了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信