Reducing noise in radioactive iodine activity selection: the utility of an online clinical calculator.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Endocrine Connections Pub Date : 2024-10-09 Print Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1530/EC-24-0299
Ayanthi Wijewardene, Matti Gild, Lyndal Tacon, Venessa Tsang, Anthony J Gill, Anthony Robert Glover, Mark Sywak, Stan Sidhu, Bruce Robinson, Paul Roach, Geoffrey Schembri, Jeremy Hoang, Roderick Clifton-Bligh
{"title":"Reducing noise in radioactive iodine activity selection: the utility of an online clinical calculator.","authors":"Ayanthi Wijewardene, Matti Gild, Lyndal Tacon, Venessa Tsang, Anthony J Gill, Anthony Robert Glover, Mark Sywak, Stan Sidhu, Bruce Robinson, Paul Roach, Geoffrey Schembri, Jeremy Hoang, Roderick Clifton-Bligh","doi":"10.1530/EC-24-0299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Noise, an unwanted variability in judgment, is ubiquitous in medicine, including in the prescription of radioactive iodine (RAI). Building upon our recently developed predictive risk model, we created an online clinical support tool to facilitate the translation of our model into clinical practice. The aim of this study is to assess the utility of an online clinical support tool to reduce noise in the treatment for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The tool was accessible via weblink or a QR code. Activity recommendations were applied to the calculator's four risk categories: 0 GBq for very low risk, 1 GBq for low risk, 4 GBq for intermediate risk, and 6 GBq for high risk. The tool was applied prospectively to 103 patients who received RAI at Royal North Shore Hospital between 2021 and 2022 and retrospectively to 393 patients treated with RAI between 2017 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference was observed in administered activity between the 2021-2022 and 2017-2021 cohorts in patients stratified as intermediate risk (median activity 3.95 GBq, interquartile range 2.03-4.04 vs 4 GBq, 4-4) and high risk (4.07 GBq, 3.95-5.7 vs 6 GBq, 6-6) with P-values of 0.01 and <0.01, respectively. No difference was seen in low-risk patients (2.01 GBq, 1.03-3.98 vs 1 GBq, 1-4, P = 0.30). Additionally, no clinically significant recurrence was observed between the two cohorts (6.6% vs 4.5%; P = 0.628).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optimal risk classification and activity recommendation continue to be established. Our data suggest that providing risk stratification and activity recommendation in an easy-to-access online tool can reduce noise and variability in activity prescription for patients with DTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11634,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Connections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562684/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Connections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-24-0299","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Noise, an unwanted variability in judgment, is ubiquitous in medicine, including in the prescription of radioactive iodine (RAI). Building upon our recently developed predictive risk model, we created an online clinical support tool to facilitate the translation of our model into clinical practice. The aim of this study is to assess the utility of an online clinical support tool to reduce noise in the treatment for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).

Methods: The tool was accessible via weblink or a QR code. Activity recommendations were applied to the calculator's four risk categories: 0 GBq for very low risk, 1 GBq for low risk, 4 GBq for intermediate risk, and 6 GBq for high risk. The tool was applied prospectively to 103 patients who received RAI at Royal North Shore Hospital between 2021 and 2022 and retrospectively to 393 patients treated with RAI between 2017 and 2021.

Results: A significant difference was observed in administered activity between the 2021-2022 and 2017-2021 cohorts in patients stratified as intermediate risk (median activity 3.95 GBq, interquartile range 2.03-4.04 vs 4 GBq, 4-4) and high risk (4.07 GBq, 3.95-5.7 vs 6 GBq, 6-6) with P-values of 0.01 and <0.01, respectively. No difference was seen in low-risk patients (2.01 GBq, 1.03-3.98 vs 1 GBq, 1-4, P = 0.30). Additionally, no clinically significant recurrence was observed between the two cohorts (6.6% vs 4.5%; P = 0.628).

Conclusion: Optimal risk classification and activity recommendation continue to be established. Our data suggest that providing risk stratification and activity recommendation in an easy-to-access online tool can reduce noise and variability in activity prescription for patients with DTC.

减少放射性碘活度选择中的噪音:在线临床计算器的效用。
背景:在医学中,包括在放射性碘(RAI)处方中,噪音(一种不必要的判断变异)无处不在。在我们最近开发的预测风险模型的基础上,我们创建了一个在线临床支持工具,以促进将我们的模型转化为临床实践。本研究旨在评估在线临床支持工具在减少 DTC 患者治疗噪音方面的效用:该工具可通过网络链接或二维码访问。活动建议适用于计算器的四个风险类别:0GBq为极低风险,1GBq为低风险,4GBq为中等风险,6GBq为高风险。该工具前瞻性地应用于 2021-2022 年间在皇家北岸医院接受 RAI 治疗的 103 名患者,并回顾性地应用于 2017-2021 年间接受 RAI 治疗的 393 名患者:结果:在 2021-2022 年与 2017-2021 年两组患者中,被分层为中度风险(中位活性 3.95GBq,IQR 2.03-4.04 vs 4GBq,4-4)和高风险(4.07GBq,3.95-5.7 vs 6GBq,6-6)的患者的给药活性存在明显差异,P 值分别为 0.01 和结论:最佳风险分级和活动建议仍有待确定;我们的数据表明,在一个易于访问的在线工具中提供风险分层和活动建议可以减少 DTC 患者活动处方中的噪音和变异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrine Connections
Endocrine Connections Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Endocrine Connections publishes original quality research and reviews in all areas of endocrinology, including papers that deal with non-classical tissues as source or targets of hormones and endocrine papers that have relevance to endocrine-related and intersecting disciplines and the wider biomedical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信