Heart rate variability metrics and myocardial recovery in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tarun W Dasari, Michiaki Nagai, Hallum Ewbank, Praloy Chakraborty, Sunny S Po
{"title":"Heart rate variability metrics and myocardial recovery in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.","authors":"Tarun W Dasari, Michiaki Nagai, Hallum Ewbank, Praloy Chakraborty, Sunny S Po","doi":"10.1007/s10286-024-01064-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Autonomic dysregulation is observed in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Abnormal heart rate variability (HRV), a measure of such dysregulation, is associated with poor prognosis in HFrEF. It is unknown if novel HRV metrics normalize in the patients with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) compared to persistent HFrEF. The aim of this study was to investigate novel HRV indexes in persistent HFrEF in comparison to HFrecEF METHODS: A standard 10-min electrocardiography measurement was performed in patients categorized in four groups: persistent HFrEF (n = 40), HFrecEF (n = 41), stage A HF (n = 73) and healthy controls (n = 40).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All HRV indexes were significantly different between the four groups. Specifically, novel metrics, such as higher parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) index and lower sympathetic nervous system (SNS) index, were observed in the HFrecEF group compared to the persistent HFrEF group. In multiple logistic regression analysis, higher PNS index (odds ratio [OR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-3.49; p = 0.01) and lower SNS index (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.87; p = 0.002) were associated with HFrecEF. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the SNS index had the highest area under the curve (AUC), followed by the PNS index and mean heart rate for the HF phenotype regarding EF recovery (AUC = 0.71, 0.69 and 0.69, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Myocardial functional recovery in HFrEF is associated with improved parasympathetic activity and reduced sympathetic activity, as reflected in the PNS and SNS indexes. These novel metrics can be potentially used to aid in identifying recovered versus non-recovered phenotypes in patients with HFrEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":10168,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Autonomic Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Autonomic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-024-01064-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Autonomic dysregulation is observed in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Abnormal heart rate variability (HRV), a measure of such dysregulation, is associated with poor prognosis in HFrEF. It is unknown if novel HRV metrics normalize in the patients with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) compared to persistent HFrEF. The aim of this study was to investigate novel HRV indexes in persistent HFrEF in comparison to HFrecEF METHODS: A standard 10-min electrocardiography measurement was performed in patients categorized in four groups: persistent HFrEF (n = 40), HFrecEF (n = 41), stage A HF (n = 73) and healthy controls (n = 40).

Results: All HRV indexes were significantly different between the four groups. Specifically, novel metrics, such as higher parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) index and lower sympathetic nervous system (SNS) index, were observed in the HFrecEF group compared to the persistent HFrEF group. In multiple logistic regression analysis, higher PNS index (odds ratio [OR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-3.49; p = 0.01) and lower SNS index (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.87; p = 0.002) were associated with HFrecEF. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the SNS index had the highest area under the curve (AUC), followed by the PNS index and mean heart rate for the HF phenotype regarding EF recovery (AUC = 0.71, 0.69 and 0.69, respectively).

Conclusion: Myocardial functional recovery in HFrEF is associated with improved parasympathetic activity and reduced sympathetic activity, as reflected in the PNS and SNS indexes. These novel metrics can be potentially used to aid in identifying recovered versus non-recovered phenotypes in patients with HFrEF.

射血分数降低型心力衰竭患者的心率变异指标和心肌恢复。
目的:射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HF)患者会出现自主神经失调。异常心率变异性(HRV)是衡量这种失调的指标之一,与射血分数降低型心力衰竭的不良预后有关。与持续性射血分数降低(HFrEF)相比,射血分数恢复(HFrecEF)患者的新型心率变异指标是否正常尚不清楚。本研究的目的是调查持续性 HFrEF 与 HFrecEF 相比的新型心率变异指标 方法:对患者进行标准的 10 分钟心电图测量,分为四组:持续性 HFrEF(n = 40)、HFrecEF(n = 41)、A 期 HF(n = 73)和健康对照组(n = 40):结果:所有心率变异指标在四组之间均有明显差异。具体而言,与持续性 HFrEF 组相比,HFrecEF 组的副交感神经系统(PNS)指数更高,交感神经系统(SNS)指数更低。在多重逻辑回归分析中,较高的 PNS 指数(几率比 [OR] 2.02,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.17-3.49;P = 0.01)和较低的 SNS 指数(OR 0.68,95% CI 0.52-0.87;P = 0.002)与 HFrecEF 相关。接收者操作特征分析显示,SNS指数的曲线下面积(AUC)最高,其次是PNS指数和平均心率(AUC分别为0.71、0.69和0.69):结论:正如PNS和SNS指数所反映的那样,HFrEF的心肌功能恢复与副交感神经活动的改善和交感神经活动的减少有关。这些新指标可用于帮助鉴别 HFrEF 患者的恢复与未恢复表型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Autonomic Research
Clinical Autonomic Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Autonomic Research aims to draw together and disseminate research work from various disciplines and specialties dealing with clinical problems resulting from autonomic dysfunction. Areas to be covered include: cardiovascular system, neurology, diabetes, endocrinology, urology, pain disorders, ophthalmology, gastroenterology, toxicology and clinical pharmacology, skin infectious diseases, renal disease. This journal is an essential source of new information for everyone working in areas involving the autonomic nervous system. A major feature of Clinical Autonomic Research is its speed of publication coupled with the highest refereeing standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信