The psychological impact of supervised quarantine facilities for the mitigation of COVID-19: A systematic review.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Australasian Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1177/10398562241283582
Eric Erickson, Daniel Bressington, David Mitchell
{"title":"The psychological impact of supervised quarantine facilities for the mitigation of COVID-19: A systematic review.","authors":"Eric Erickson, Daniel Bressington, David Mitchell","doi":"10.1177/10398562241283582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Government mandated quarantine outside the home was implemented to mitigate COVID-19 in some countries. Individual studies report that this can result in psychological distress. Investigating levels of distress and associated risk factors across different settings would inform public health models of care during future pandemics. However, no previous systematic reviews have been conducted on the topic. Therefore, we systematically reviewed international research on the prevalence and risk factors of psychological distress within supervised quarantine facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was conducted using Medline, Psychological and Behavioural Sciences, Psych Info, Cochrane databases and Google Scholar from January 2020 until June 2023. Relevant quantitative studies published in English were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13 studies (pooled participants <i>n</i> = 4366) were included in this review. The prevalence of psychological distress varied widely across the included studies (depression 4%-63%; anxiety 4%-100%; stress 1%-68%). Associated risk factors identified were also heterogeneous between studies and facilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In future pandemics, the benefits of infection mitigation need to be weighed against the risk of psychological distress. Models of care utilising specifically designed facilities, with greater freedoms, increased comfort and ease of access to mental health services may limit psychological distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"496-509"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562241283582","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Government mandated quarantine outside the home was implemented to mitigate COVID-19 in some countries. Individual studies report that this can result in psychological distress. Investigating levels of distress and associated risk factors across different settings would inform public health models of care during future pandemics. However, no previous systematic reviews have been conducted on the topic. Therefore, we systematically reviewed international research on the prevalence and risk factors of psychological distress within supervised quarantine facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using Medline, Psychological and Behavioural Sciences, Psych Info, Cochrane databases and Google Scholar from January 2020 until June 2023. Relevant quantitative studies published in English were included.

Results: 13 studies (pooled participants n = 4366) were included in this review. The prevalence of psychological distress varied widely across the included studies (depression 4%-63%; anxiety 4%-100%; stress 1%-68%). Associated risk factors identified were also heterogeneous between studies and facilities.

Conclusion: In future pandemics, the benefits of infection mitigation need to be weighed against the risk of psychological distress. Models of care utilising specifically designed facilities, with greater freedoms, increased comfort and ease of access to mental health services may limit psychological distress.

用于缓解 COVID-19 的监督隔离设施的心理影响:系统回顾。
背景:在一些国家,政府强制实施家庭外检疫,以减轻 COVID-19 的影响。个别研究报告称,这可能会导致心理困扰。调查不同环境下的痛苦程度和相关风险因素将为未来流行病期间的公共卫生护理模式提供参考。然而,此前并没有对这一主题进行过系统回顾。因此,我们对 COVID-19 大流行期间监管隔离设施内心理困扰的发生率和风险因素的国际研究进行了系统回顾:我们使用 Medline、Psychological and Behavioural Sciences、Psych Info、Cochrane 数据库和 Google Scholar 对 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月期间的文献进行了系统回顾。纳入了以英语发表的相关定量研究:本综述共纳入 13 项研究(汇总参与者 n = 4366)。所纳入研究的心理困扰发生率差异很大(抑郁 4%-63%;焦虑 4%-100%;压力 1%-68%)。在不同的研究和设施中,发现的相关风险因素也不尽相同:结论:在未来的流行病中,需要权衡减轻感染的益处与心理压力的风险。利用专门设计的设施、更大的自由度、更高的舒适度和更容易获得心理健康服务的护理模式可能会减少心理困扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Psychiatry
Australasian Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
159
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信