Robert Stowell-Campos, Erin Lawrence, Elisabeth Breese Marsh, Dawn Merbach
{"title":"Scrambler therapy for treatment of poststroke pain.","authors":"Robert Stowell-Campos, Erin Lawrence, Elisabeth Breese Marsh, Dawn Merbach","doi":"10.1002/acn3.52201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Strokes involving sensory pathways can result in contralesional pain syndromes often refractory to pharmacologic interventions. Scrambler therapy (ST) is a noninvasive electroanalgesia device used to treat pain caused by peripheral neuropathy; however, data are scarce regarding its use in conditions secondary to central nervous system pathology. We evaluate the efficacy of ST to treat poststroke pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with a history of prior stroke resulting in contralesional pain were randomized to receive ST or Sham as an adjunct to their stable medication regimen. Participants underwent 5 consecutive daily 40-min sessions. The study was blinded to patient and assessor. Pain scores (0-10) were recorded at baseline, pre- and postsession, and 4 weeks after final treatment. Student's t-tests compared differences in the mean change in pain score between groups immediately post-treatment #5, and at 4-weeks. The chi-squared analysis compared the proportion of patients in each group with >50% pain reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants randomized to ST had a mean change in pain score of -3.73 (SD 2.85) postintervention and -2.57 (SD 2.07) at 4 weeks, while the Sham group had a mean change in score of -0.94 (SD 1.36) and -0.25 (SD 0.84) (p between groups = 0.012, 0.004, respectively). Significantly more participants treated with ST reported a >50% reduction in pain immediately postintervention compared to Sham (70% vs. 10%, p = 0.006), but not at follow-up (30% vs. 10%, p = ns).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>ST may effectively decrease poststroke pain compared to Sham. Larger studies are needed to evaluate confounders such as stroke location, time from stroke, and concomitant treatment with medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"2904-2911"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.52201","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.52201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Strokes involving sensory pathways can result in contralesional pain syndromes often refractory to pharmacologic interventions. Scrambler therapy (ST) is a noninvasive electroanalgesia device used to treat pain caused by peripheral neuropathy; however, data are scarce regarding its use in conditions secondary to central nervous system pathology. We evaluate the efficacy of ST to treat poststroke pain.
Methods: Twenty patients with a history of prior stroke resulting in contralesional pain were randomized to receive ST or Sham as an adjunct to their stable medication regimen. Participants underwent 5 consecutive daily 40-min sessions. The study was blinded to patient and assessor. Pain scores (0-10) were recorded at baseline, pre- and postsession, and 4 weeks after final treatment. Student's t-tests compared differences in the mean change in pain score between groups immediately post-treatment #5, and at 4-weeks. The chi-squared analysis compared the proportion of patients in each group with >50% pain reduction.
Results: Participants randomized to ST had a mean change in pain score of -3.73 (SD 2.85) postintervention and -2.57 (SD 2.07) at 4 weeks, while the Sham group had a mean change in score of -0.94 (SD 1.36) and -0.25 (SD 0.84) (p between groups = 0.012, 0.004, respectively). Significantly more participants treated with ST reported a >50% reduction in pain immediately postintervention compared to Sham (70% vs. 10%, p = 0.006), but not at follow-up (30% vs. 10%, p = ns).
Interpretation: ST may effectively decrease poststroke pain compared to Sham. Larger studies are needed to evaluate confounders such as stroke location, time from stroke, and concomitant treatment with medications.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.