{"title":"Poisoning medical knowledge using large language models","authors":"Junwei Yang, Hanwen Xu, Srbuhi Mirzoyan, Tong Chen, Zixuan Liu, Zequn Liu, Wei Ju, Luchen Liu, Zhiping Xiao, Ming Zhang, Sheng Wang","doi":"10.1038/s42256-024-00899-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biomedical knowledge graphs (KGs) constructed from medical literature have been widely used to validate biomedical discoveries and generate new hypotheses. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated a strong ability to generate human-like text data. Although most of these text data have been useful, LLM might also be used to generate malicious content. Here, we investigate whether it is possible that a malicious actor can use an LLM to generate a malicious paper that poisons medical KGs and further affects downstream biomedical applications. As a proof of concept, we develop Scorpius, a conditional text-generation model that generates a malicious paper abstract conditioned on a promoted drug and a target disease. The goal is to fool the medical KG constructed from a mixture of this malicious abstract and millions of real papers so that KG consumers will misidentify this promoted drug as relevant to the target disease. We evaluated Scorpius on a KG constructed from 3,818,528 papers and found that Scorpius can increase the relevance of 71.3% drug–disease pairs from the top 1,000 to the top ten by adding only one malicious abstract. Moreover, the generation of Scorpius achieves better perplexity than ChatGPT, suggesting that such malicious abstracts cannot be efficiently detected by humans. Collectively, Scorpius demonstrates the possibility of poisoning medical KGs and manipulating downstream applications using LLMs, indicating the importance of accountable and trustworthy medical knowledge discovery in the era of LLMs. With increasing reliance on public data sources, researchers are concerned whether low-quality or even adversarial data could have detrimental effects on medical models. Yang et al. developed Scorpius, a malicious text generator, to investigate whether large language models can mislead medical knowledge graphs. They show that a single generated paper abstract can mislead a medical reasoning system that has read millions of papers.","PeriodicalId":48533,"journal":{"name":"Nature Machine Intelligence","volume":"6 10","pages":"1156-1168"},"PeriodicalIF":18.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Machine Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-024-00899-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Biomedical knowledge graphs (KGs) constructed from medical literature have been widely used to validate biomedical discoveries and generate new hypotheses. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated a strong ability to generate human-like text data. Although most of these text data have been useful, LLM might also be used to generate malicious content. Here, we investigate whether it is possible that a malicious actor can use an LLM to generate a malicious paper that poisons medical KGs and further affects downstream biomedical applications. As a proof of concept, we develop Scorpius, a conditional text-generation model that generates a malicious paper abstract conditioned on a promoted drug and a target disease. The goal is to fool the medical KG constructed from a mixture of this malicious abstract and millions of real papers so that KG consumers will misidentify this promoted drug as relevant to the target disease. We evaluated Scorpius on a KG constructed from 3,818,528 papers and found that Scorpius can increase the relevance of 71.3% drug–disease pairs from the top 1,000 to the top ten by adding only one malicious abstract. Moreover, the generation of Scorpius achieves better perplexity than ChatGPT, suggesting that such malicious abstracts cannot be efficiently detected by humans. Collectively, Scorpius demonstrates the possibility of poisoning medical KGs and manipulating downstream applications using LLMs, indicating the importance of accountable and trustworthy medical knowledge discovery in the era of LLMs. With increasing reliance on public data sources, researchers are concerned whether low-quality or even adversarial data could have detrimental effects on medical models. Yang et al. developed Scorpius, a malicious text generator, to investigate whether large language models can mislead medical knowledge graphs. They show that a single generated paper abstract can mislead a medical reasoning system that has read millions of papers.
期刊介绍:
Nature Machine Intelligence is a distinguished publication that presents original research and reviews on various topics in machine learning, robotics, and AI. Our focus extends beyond these fields, exploring their profound impact on other scientific disciplines, as well as societal and industrial aspects. We recognize limitless possibilities wherein machine intelligence can augment human capabilities and knowledge in domains like scientific exploration, healthcare, medical diagnostics, and the creation of safe and sustainable cities, transportation, and agriculture. Simultaneously, we acknowledge the emergence of ethical, social, and legal concerns due to the rapid pace of advancements.
To foster interdisciplinary discussions on these far-reaching implications, Nature Machine Intelligence serves as a platform for dialogue facilitated through Comments, News Features, News & Views articles, and Correspondence. Our goal is to encourage a comprehensive examination of these subjects.
Similar to all Nature-branded journals, Nature Machine Intelligence operates under the guidance of a team of skilled editors. We adhere to a fair and rigorous peer-review process, ensuring high standards of copy-editing and production, swift publication, and editorial independence.