Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of androgen measurement in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis to inform evidence-based guidelines

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Asmamaw Demis Bizuneh, Anju E Joham, Helena Teede, Aya Mousa, Arul Earnest, James M Hawley, Laura Smith, Ricardo Azziz, Wiebke Arlt, Chau Thien Tay
{"title":"Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of androgen measurement in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis to inform evidence-based guidelines","authors":"Asmamaw Demis Bizuneh, Anju E Joham, Helena Teede, Aya Mousa, Arul Earnest, James M Hawley, Laura Smith, Ricardo Azziz, Wiebke Arlt, Chau Thien Tay","doi":"10.1093/humupd/dmae028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Biochemical hyperandrogenism is a hallmark and diagnostic feature of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). However, the most accurate androgen measurement for assessing biochemical hyperandrogenism in PCOS diagnosis remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE This systematic review aimed to assess different androgen measures [including total testosterone (TT), calculated free testosterone (cFT), free androgen index (FAI), androstenedione (A4), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), and dihydrotestosterone (DHT)] for accuracy in diagnosing biochemical hyperandrogenism in women with PCOS, to inform the 2023 International PCOS Evidence-based Guidelines. SEARCH METHODS To update evidence from the 2018 International PCOS Guidelines, a systematic search from 3 July 2017 to 23 June 2023 was conducted across Medline (Ovid), CINAHL, all EBM, EMBASE, and PsycInfo for articles evaluating androgens in the diagnosis of biochemical hyperandrogenism. The revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. A diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis was performed using STATA 18 software. Summary sensitivity and specificity were calculated with 95% CIs using the bivariate model, while the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (ROC) model was used to produce a summary ROC curve. OUTCOMES Of 23 studies reviewed, 18 were included in the meta-analysis, with data from 2857 participants (1650 with PCOS and 1207 controls). For diagnosing biochemical hyperandrogenism in PCOS, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC with 95% CI were for TT: 0.74 (0.63–0.82), 0.86 (0.77–0.91), and 0.87 (0.84–0.90); cFT: 0.89 (0.69–0.96), 0.83 (0.79–0.86), and 0.85 (0.81–0.88); FAI: 0.78 (0.70–0.83), 0.85 (0.76–0.90), and 0.87 (0.84–0.90); A4: 0.75 (0.60–0.86), 0.71 (0.51–0.85), and 0.80 (0.76–0.83); and DHEAS: 0.75 (0.61–0.85), 0.67 (0.48–0.81), and 0.77 (0.73–0.81), respectively. In subgroup analyses, liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) had superior sensitivity for measuring cFT, FAI, A4, and DHEAS, and superior specificity for measuring TT, cFT, and FAI, compared to the direct immunoassay method. WIDER IMPLICATIONS Our results directly informed the 2023 International PCOS Guideline recommendations to use TT and FT as the first-line laboratory tests to assess biochemical hyperandrogenism in the diagnosis of PCOS. cFT should be assessed by equilibrium dialysis or ammonium sulfate precipitation, or calculated using FAI. If TT or cFT are not elevated, A4 and DHEAS could also be considered, noting their poorer specificity. Laboratories should utilize LC-MS/MS for androgen measurement given its high accuracy. Future studies should focus on establishing optimal normative cut-off values in large, unselected, and ethnically diverse cohorts of women. REGISTRATION NUMBER The review protocol was prepublished in the 2023 PCOS Guideline Technical Report (https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/3379591/TechnicalReport-2023.pdf).","PeriodicalId":55045,"journal":{"name":"Human Reproduction Update","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Reproduction Update","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmae028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Biochemical hyperandrogenism is a hallmark and diagnostic feature of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). However, the most accurate androgen measurement for assessing biochemical hyperandrogenism in PCOS diagnosis remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE This systematic review aimed to assess different androgen measures [including total testosterone (TT), calculated free testosterone (cFT), free androgen index (FAI), androstenedione (A4), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), and dihydrotestosterone (DHT)] for accuracy in diagnosing biochemical hyperandrogenism in women with PCOS, to inform the 2023 International PCOS Evidence-based Guidelines. SEARCH METHODS To update evidence from the 2018 International PCOS Guidelines, a systematic search from 3 July 2017 to 23 June 2023 was conducted across Medline (Ovid), CINAHL, all EBM, EMBASE, and PsycInfo for articles evaluating androgens in the diagnosis of biochemical hyperandrogenism. The revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. A diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis was performed using STATA 18 software. Summary sensitivity and specificity were calculated with 95% CIs using the bivariate model, while the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (ROC) model was used to produce a summary ROC curve. OUTCOMES Of 23 studies reviewed, 18 were included in the meta-analysis, with data from 2857 participants (1650 with PCOS and 1207 controls). For diagnosing biochemical hyperandrogenism in PCOS, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC with 95% CI were for TT: 0.74 (0.63–0.82), 0.86 (0.77–0.91), and 0.87 (0.84–0.90); cFT: 0.89 (0.69–0.96), 0.83 (0.79–0.86), and 0.85 (0.81–0.88); FAI: 0.78 (0.70–0.83), 0.85 (0.76–0.90), and 0.87 (0.84–0.90); A4: 0.75 (0.60–0.86), 0.71 (0.51–0.85), and 0.80 (0.76–0.83); and DHEAS: 0.75 (0.61–0.85), 0.67 (0.48–0.81), and 0.77 (0.73–0.81), respectively. In subgroup analyses, liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) had superior sensitivity for measuring cFT, FAI, A4, and DHEAS, and superior specificity for measuring TT, cFT, and FAI, compared to the direct immunoassay method. WIDER IMPLICATIONS Our results directly informed the 2023 International PCOS Guideline recommendations to use TT and FT as the first-line laboratory tests to assess biochemical hyperandrogenism in the diagnosis of PCOS. cFT should be assessed by equilibrium dialysis or ammonium sulfate precipitation, or calculated using FAI. If TT or cFT are not elevated, A4 and DHEAS could also be considered, noting their poorer specificity. Laboratories should utilize LC-MS/MS for androgen measurement given its high accuracy. Future studies should focus on establishing optimal normative cut-off values in large, unselected, and ethnically diverse cohorts of women. REGISTRATION NUMBER The review protocol was prepublished in the 2023 PCOS Guideline Technical Report (https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/3379591/TechnicalReport-2023.pdf).
评估多囊卵巢综合征雄激素测量的诊断准确性:为循证指南提供信息的系统综述和诊断荟萃分析
背景生化高雄激素是多囊卵巢综合症(PCOS)的标志和诊断特征。然而,在多囊卵巢综合症诊断中,用于评估生化高雄激素症的最准确雄激素测量方法仍不确定。目的和依据 本系统综述旨在评估不同雄激素测量指标(包括总睾酮 (TT)、计算游离睾酮 (cFT)、游离雄激素指数 (FAI)、雄烯二酮 (A4)、硫酸脱氢表雄酮 (DHEAS) 和双氢睾酮 (DHT))在诊断多囊卵巢综合征女性生化高雄激素症方面的准确性,为 2023 年国际多囊卵巢综合征循证指南提供参考。检索方法 为了更新 2018 年《国际多囊卵巢综合征指南》中的证据,从 2017 年 7 月 3 日至 2023 年 6 月 23 日,在 Medline (Ovid)、CINAHL、所有 EBM、EMBASE 和 PsycInfo 中对评估诊断生化高雄激素症中雄激素的文章进行了系统检索。采用修订后的《诊断准确性研究质量评估》(QUADAS-2)来评估偏倚风险和适用性。使用 STATA 18 软件进行了诊断测试准确性荟萃分析。使用双变量模型计算出灵敏度和特异度的总和及 95% CIs,同时使用分层汇总接收器操作特征 (ROC) 模型生成汇总 ROC 曲线。结果 在所审查的 23 项研究中,有 18 项被纳入荟萃分析,数据来自 2857 名参与者(1650 名多囊卵巢综合症患者和 1207 名对照者)。对于诊断 PCOS 患者的生化高雄激素症,TT 的集合敏感性、特异性和 AUC(95% CI)分别为 0.74 (0.63-0.82)、0.86 (0.77-0.91) 和 0.87 (0.84-0.90);cFT 的集合敏感性、特异性和 AUC 分别为 0.89 (0.69-0.96)、0.83 (0.79-0.86) 和 0.85(0.81-0.88);FAI:0.78(0.70-0.83)、0.85(0.76-0.90)和 0.87(0.84-0.90);A4:0.75(0.60-0.86)、0.71(0.51-0.85)和 0.80(0.76-0.83);DHEAS:分别为 0.75(0.61-0.85)、0.67(0.48-0.81)和 0.77(0.73-0.81)。在分组分析中,与直接免疫测定法相比,液相色谱串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)在测量 cFT、FAI、A4 和 DHEAS 方面具有更高的灵敏度,在测量 TT、cFT 和 FAI 方面具有更高的特异性。我们的研究结果为 2023 年国际多囊卵巢综合症指南提供了直接依据,该指南建议在诊断多囊卵巢综合症时将 TT 和 FT 作为评估生化高雄激素的一线实验室检测项目。如果 TT 或 cFT 没有升高,也可考虑检测 A4 和 DHEAS,但要注意它们的特异性较差。鉴于 LC-MS/MS 的高准确性,实验室应使用 LC-MS/MS 进行雄激素测量。未来的研究应侧重于在大型、非选择性和种族多样化的女性群体中建立最佳标准临界值。注册编号 评审方案已预先发布在《2023 年多囊卵巢综合症指南技术报告》中 (https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/3379591/TechnicalReport-2023.pdf)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Reproduction Update
Human Reproduction Update 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
28.80
自引率
1.50%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction Update is the leading journal in its field, boasting a Journal Impact FactorTM of 13.3 and ranked first in Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (Source: Journal Citation ReportsTM from Clarivate, 2023). It specializes in publishing comprehensive and systematic review articles covering various aspects of human reproductive physiology and medicine. The journal prioritizes basic, transitional, and clinical topics related to reproduction, encompassing areas such as andrology, embryology, infertility, gynaecology, pregnancy, reproductive endocrinology, reproductive epidemiology, reproductive genetics, reproductive immunology, and reproductive oncology. Human Reproduction Update is published on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), maintaining the highest scientific and editorial standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信