CAPability-01: Success of anti-PD-1, HDAC inhibitor, and anti-VEGF combination in colorectal cancer

Yujie Tan, Yunfang Yu
{"title":"CAPability-01: Success of anti-PD-1, HDAC inhibitor, and anti-VEGF combination in colorectal cancer","authors":"Yujie Tan,&nbsp;Yunfang Yu","doi":"10.1002/mef2.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The CAPability-01 trial, led by Feng Wang et al.,<span><sup>1</sup></span> was published in <i>Nature Medicine</i> on March 04, 2024. This study highlighted that a triplet regimen of the programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody sintilimab with the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) chidamide with the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody bevacizumab significantly improved the progression-free survival (PFS) and response in microsatellite stable/proficient mismatch repair (MSS/pMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC).</p><p>CAPability-01 trial is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase 2 clinical trial, that evaluated the efficacy of a triplet therapy (sintilimab, chidamide, and bevacizumab) versus a doublet (sintilimab with chidamide) in patients with unresectable, chemotherapy-refractory, locally advanced or metastatic MSS/pMMR CRC. Forty-eight patients were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive the triplet or doublet treatment.</p><p>The study found that the triplet regimen outperformed the doublet regimen in most key endpoints. More than 50% of the patients presented with liver metastases or lung metastases at baseline. Treatment histories were diverse, with almost half of the patients, particularly in the doublet group, receiving third-line or later treatment. The triplet treatment group exhibited a significantly higher PFS rate and improved overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) compared to the doublet group, with 44% achieving partial response and 28% maintaining stable disease. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with liver metastases benefited more from the triplet treatment, showing significantly notably better outcomes in PFS (7.3 months vs. 1.4 months, <i>p</i> = 0.001), ORR (50.0% vs. 8.3%), and DCR (71.4% vs. 8.3%) compared with those on the doublet regimen. In this study, the incidence rates of treatment-related side effects (TEAEs) occurred in 60.0% of patients in the triplet group and 30.4% in the doublet therapy. Grade 3 or higher adverse events included thrombocytopenia, reported in 16.0% of patients receiving triplet therapy compared to 8.7% in the doublet group, and neutropenia, which was reported at 28.0% for the triplet therapy and not at all for the doublet. The triplet regimen appeared promising for patients with MSS/pMMR unresectable advanced or metastatic CRC, providing longer progression-free survival and manageable toxicity.</p><p>Despite the advancements in chemotherapy and target therapy, the prognosis of most patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic CRC remains poor. Several studies are currently evaluating the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antiangiogenesis therapy, and HDAC inhibitors in treating microsatellite instability-high/deficient mismatch repair phenotypes (MSI-H/dMMR) CRC (Table 1). ICIs, like PD-1 antibodies and CTLA-4 antibodies, have demonstrated impressive clinical benefits in CRC patients such as MSI-H/dMMR.<span><sup>2</sup></span> These patients often have numerous genomic mutations, where mutated peptides activate immune cell priming and infiltration. MSI-H/dMMR CRCs typically exhibit increased levels of CD8+ T cell infiltration, T helper 1 (TH1), CD4+ T cell infiltration, tumor-associated macrophage infiltration, and IFNγ secretion. Conversely, patients with MSS/pMMR phenotype often develop an immunosuppressive tumor environment marked by a low tumor mutation burden, limited effector T cell infiltration, and an influx of immunosuppressive cells. Moreover, in this environment, tumor cells often increase the expression of T cell inhibitory ligands, such as CD80 and CD86 of the B7 family and PDL1, allowing tumors to evade immune destruction. ICIs target these signaling to enhance the destruction of tumor cells by cytotoxic T-cells. However, MSS/pMMR tumors, which account for over 90% of advanced CRC cases, generally fall to generate immunostimulatory neoantigens and exhibit low levels of immune-inhibitory ligands, resulting in T-cell exclusion. Therefore, patients with MSS/pMMR tumors respond differently to ICI therapies, whether used alone or in combination. The main challenge in treating these tumors is the lack of immune cell recruitment and the absence of immunostimulatory neoantigens, both are crucial for effective treatment responses.</p><p>Recent studies indicated that resistance to ICIs in pMMR/MSI-L mCRC may be mitigated by combining ICIs with antiangiogenesis therapies, such as anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody (mAb), decoy VEGF-trap receptor, anti-VEGFR2 mAb, and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). These combination therapies are believed to improve T-cell infiltration and reduce regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells by normalizing vascular structures and decreasing hypoxia, potentially converting tumor-associated macrophages to a more immune-stimulatory state while reducing immunosuppressive signals.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>Motivated by encouraging preclinical results, various clinical trials have been conducted to assess the effectiveness of this combination. The REGONIVO study, for example, evaluated the combination of nivolumab and regorafenib in MSS/pMMR advanced CRC patients, showing an mPFS of 7.9 months, and a 41.8% PFS rate at 1 year, reflecting positive outcomes.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Nonetheless, results from other trials have shown variability. For example, the phase I/Ib clinical trial NCT03712943, examined the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib combined with nivolumab in pMMR mCRC, reported a PR in 10% of patients, with 53% maintaining SD, and DCR of 63%. The mPFS and OS were 4.3 and 11.1 months, respectively. In contrast, another trial, NCT04126733, reported a disease control rate of 39% with mPFS and OS at 1.8 months and 11.9 months, respectively. These findings underscore the pressing need for optimized treatment strategies that combine ICIs with targeted therapies.</p><p>HDACi have demonstrated promise in fostering an antitumor immune microenvironment by modulating PD-L1 expression and epigenetic of immune cell activation, differentiation, and effector function. Although HDACi combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have yielded encouraging responses in lymphoma, their effectiveness in solid tumors such as non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer has been modest, with overall response rates ranging from 6.7% to 10%.</p><p>The combination of HDACi, anti-VEGF, and anti-PD-1 therapies, known as triplet therapy, has demonstrated enhanced efficacy in treating MSS/pMMR advanced CRC, especially in those with liver metastases. This improvement has been confirmed in both in preclinical studies and clinical trials. For example, in a Phase 2 study on a pMMR mCRC cohort treated with regorafenib and nivolumab, patients with liver metastases had lower ORR (4% vs 25%), shorter PFS (median: 2.3 vs. 8.9 months) and shorter OS (median: 9.7 months vs. not reached) compared to those without liver metastases. Furthermore, in the REGONIVO study, the ORR for all enrolled CRC patients was 36%, but only 15.4% for those with liver metastases.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Similarly, the REGOTORI study found that patients with liver metastases exhibited a lower response rate compared to those without liver metastasis (8.7% vs. 30.0%).<span><sup>5</sup></span> However, the CAPability-01 trial showed that triplet therapy provides superior efficacy in mCRC regardless of liver metastases.</p><p>Although the study yielded encouraging outcomes, its small size and absence of long-term follow-up data are notable limitations. Consequently, further studies are required to confirm these results and gain a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Building on these findings, a multicenter, randomized, Phase III trial—CAPability-02—has been launched to study patients with MSS-type CRC who have failed first-line treatment including oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. With more clinical trials conducted, it is believed that they will provide conclusive evidence for the effectiveness of the triplet therapy regimen in treating various malignancies, including triple-negative breast cancer.</p><p>The CAPability-01 trial found that triplet therapy with sintilimab, chidamide, and bevacizumab significantly improved PFS, ORR, and DCR in chemotherapy-refractory MSS/pMMR CRC with doublet therapy. The triplet combination also created a more immunologically active tumor microenvironment, enhancing CD8 + T cell infiltration. The findings suggest that this combination could be a promising approach for treating advanced CRC, particularly in patients with liver metastasis, who traditionally have poorer outcomes.</p><p><b>Yujie Tan</b>: Conceptualization (lead); project administration (equal); writing—original draft (equal); writing—review and editing (equal). <b>Yunfang Yu</b>: Conceptualization (equal); funding acquisition (equal); project administration (equal); supervision (lead). Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript.</p><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p><p>The authors have nothing to report.</p>","PeriodicalId":74135,"journal":{"name":"MedComm - Future medicine","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mef2.97","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedComm - Future medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mef2.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The CAPability-01 trial, led by Feng Wang et al.,1 was published in Nature Medicine on March 04, 2024. This study highlighted that a triplet regimen of the programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody sintilimab with the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) chidamide with the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody bevacizumab significantly improved the progression-free survival (PFS) and response in microsatellite stable/proficient mismatch repair (MSS/pMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC).

CAPability-01 trial is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase 2 clinical trial, that evaluated the efficacy of a triplet therapy (sintilimab, chidamide, and bevacizumab) versus a doublet (sintilimab with chidamide) in patients with unresectable, chemotherapy-refractory, locally advanced or metastatic MSS/pMMR CRC. Forty-eight patients were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive the triplet or doublet treatment.

The study found that the triplet regimen outperformed the doublet regimen in most key endpoints. More than 50% of the patients presented with liver metastases or lung metastases at baseline. Treatment histories were diverse, with almost half of the patients, particularly in the doublet group, receiving third-line or later treatment. The triplet treatment group exhibited a significantly higher PFS rate and improved overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) compared to the doublet group, with 44% achieving partial response and 28% maintaining stable disease. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with liver metastases benefited more from the triplet treatment, showing significantly notably better outcomes in PFS (7.3 months vs. 1.4 months, p = 0.001), ORR (50.0% vs. 8.3%), and DCR (71.4% vs. 8.3%) compared with those on the doublet regimen. In this study, the incidence rates of treatment-related side effects (TEAEs) occurred in 60.0% of patients in the triplet group and 30.4% in the doublet therapy. Grade 3 or higher adverse events included thrombocytopenia, reported in 16.0% of patients receiving triplet therapy compared to 8.7% in the doublet group, and neutropenia, which was reported at 28.0% for the triplet therapy and not at all for the doublet. The triplet regimen appeared promising for patients with MSS/pMMR unresectable advanced or metastatic CRC, providing longer progression-free survival and manageable toxicity.

Despite the advancements in chemotherapy and target therapy, the prognosis of most patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic CRC remains poor. Several studies are currently evaluating the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antiangiogenesis therapy, and HDAC inhibitors in treating microsatellite instability-high/deficient mismatch repair phenotypes (MSI-H/dMMR) CRC (Table 1). ICIs, like PD-1 antibodies and CTLA-4 antibodies, have demonstrated impressive clinical benefits in CRC patients such as MSI-H/dMMR.2 These patients often have numerous genomic mutations, where mutated peptides activate immune cell priming and infiltration. MSI-H/dMMR CRCs typically exhibit increased levels of CD8+ T cell infiltration, T helper 1 (TH1), CD4+ T cell infiltration, tumor-associated macrophage infiltration, and IFNγ secretion. Conversely, patients with MSS/pMMR phenotype often develop an immunosuppressive tumor environment marked by a low tumor mutation burden, limited effector T cell infiltration, and an influx of immunosuppressive cells. Moreover, in this environment, tumor cells often increase the expression of T cell inhibitory ligands, such as CD80 and CD86 of the B7 family and PDL1, allowing tumors to evade immune destruction. ICIs target these signaling to enhance the destruction of tumor cells by cytotoxic T-cells. However, MSS/pMMR tumors, which account for over 90% of advanced CRC cases, generally fall to generate immunostimulatory neoantigens and exhibit low levels of immune-inhibitory ligands, resulting in T-cell exclusion. Therefore, patients with MSS/pMMR tumors respond differently to ICI therapies, whether used alone or in combination. The main challenge in treating these tumors is the lack of immune cell recruitment and the absence of immunostimulatory neoantigens, both are crucial for effective treatment responses.

Recent studies indicated that resistance to ICIs in pMMR/MSI-L mCRC may be mitigated by combining ICIs with antiangiogenesis therapies, such as anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody (mAb), decoy VEGF-trap receptor, anti-VEGFR2 mAb, and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). These combination therapies are believed to improve T-cell infiltration and reduce regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells by normalizing vascular structures and decreasing hypoxia, potentially converting tumor-associated macrophages to a more immune-stimulatory state while reducing immunosuppressive signals.3

Motivated by encouraging preclinical results, various clinical trials have been conducted to assess the effectiveness of this combination. The REGONIVO study, for example, evaluated the combination of nivolumab and regorafenib in MSS/pMMR advanced CRC patients, showing an mPFS of 7.9 months, and a 41.8% PFS rate at 1 year, reflecting positive outcomes.4 Nonetheless, results from other trials have shown variability. For example, the phase I/Ib clinical trial NCT03712943, examined the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib combined with nivolumab in pMMR mCRC, reported a PR in 10% of patients, with 53% maintaining SD, and DCR of 63%. The mPFS and OS were 4.3 and 11.1 months, respectively. In contrast, another trial, NCT04126733, reported a disease control rate of 39% with mPFS and OS at 1.8 months and 11.9 months, respectively. These findings underscore the pressing need for optimized treatment strategies that combine ICIs with targeted therapies.

HDACi have demonstrated promise in fostering an antitumor immune microenvironment by modulating PD-L1 expression and epigenetic of immune cell activation, differentiation, and effector function. Although HDACi combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have yielded encouraging responses in lymphoma, their effectiveness in solid tumors such as non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer has been modest, with overall response rates ranging from 6.7% to 10%.

The combination of HDACi, anti-VEGF, and anti-PD-1 therapies, known as triplet therapy, has demonstrated enhanced efficacy in treating MSS/pMMR advanced CRC, especially in those with liver metastases. This improvement has been confirmed in both in preclinical studies and clinical trials. For example, in a Phase 2 study on a pMMR mCRC cohort treated with regorafenib and nivolumab, patients with liver metastases had lower ORR (4% vs 25%), shorter PFS (median: 2.3 vs. 8.9 months) and shorter OS (median: 9.7 months vs. not reached) compared to those without liver metastases. Furthermore, in the REGONIVO study, the ORR for all enrolled CRC patients was 36%, but only 15.4% for those with liver metastases.4 Similarly, the REGOTORI study found that patients with liver metastases exhibited a lower response rate compared to those without liver metastasis (8.7% vs. 30.0%).5 However, the CAPability-01 trial showed that triplet therapy provides superior efficacy in mCRC regardless of liver metastases.

Although the study yielded encouraging outcomes, its small size and absence of long-term follow-up data are notable limitations. Consequently, further studies are required to confirm these results and gain a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Building on these findings, a multicenter, randomized, Phase III trial—CAPability-02—has been launched to study patients with MSS-type CRC who have failed first-line treatment including oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. With more clinical trials conducted, it is believed that they will provide conclusive evidence for the effectiveness of the triplet therapy regimen in treating various malignancies, including triple-negative breast cancer.

The CAPability-01 trial found that triplet therapy with sintilimab, chidamide, and bevacizumab significantly improved PFS, ORR, and DCR in chemotherapy-refractory MSS/pMMR CRC with doublet therapy. The triplet combination also created a more immunologically active tumor microenvironment, enhancing CD8 + T cell infiltration. The findings suggest that this combination could be a promising approach for treating advanced CRC, particularly in patients with liver metastasis, who traditionally have poorer outcomes.

Yujie Tan: Conceptualization (lead); project administration (equal); writing—original draft (equal); writing—review and editing (equal). Yunfang Yu: Conceptualization (equal); funding acquisition (equal); project administration (equal); supervision (lead). Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

The authors have nothing to report.

CAPability-01:抗 PD-1、HDAC 抑制剂和抗血管内皮生长因子联合疗法在结直肠癌中的成功应用
3.在令人鼓舞的临床前研究结果的推动下,已经开展了各种临床试验来评估这种组合的有效性。例如,REGONIVO 研究评估了 nivolumab 和瑞戈非尼联合治疗 MSS/pMMR 晚期 CRC 患者的效果,结果显示 mPFS 为 7.9 个月,1 年的 PFS 率为 41.8%,反映了积极的结果。例如,I/Ib 期临床试验 NCT03712943 考察了瑞戈非尼联合 nivolumab 治疗 pMMR mCRC 的安全性和有效性,10% 的患者获得 PR,53% 的患者维持 SD,DCR 为 63%。mPFS和OS分别为4.3个月和11.1个月。相比之下,另一项名为 NCT04126733 的试验报告显示,疾病控制率为 39%,mPFS 和 OS 分别为 1.8 个月和 11.9 个月。HDACi通过调节PD-L1的表达以及免疫细胞活化、分化和效应功能的表观遗传学,有望促进抗肿瘤免疫微环境的形成。虽然HDACi与PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合治疗淋巴瘤取得了令人鼓舞的疗效,但它们对实体瘤(如非小细胞肺癌和乳腺癌)的疗效并不明显,总体反应率在6.7%到10%之间。HDACi、抗血管内皮生长因子和抗PD-1疗法的联合治疗,即所谓的三联疗法,在治疗MSS/pMMR晚期CRC,尤其是肝转移的CRC方面显示出更强的疗效。临床前研究和临床试验都证实了这种疗效的提高。例如,在一项使用瑞戈非尼和 nivolumab 治疗 pMMR mCRC 的 2 期研究中,与没有肝转移的患者相比,有肝转移的患者 ORR 更低(4% 对 25%),PFS 更短(中位:2.3 个月对 8.9 个月),OS 更短(中位:9.7 个月对未达到)。此外,在 REGONIVO 研究中,所有入组 CRC 患者的 ORR 为 36%,但肝转移患者的 ORR 仅为 15.4%。同样,REGOTORI 研究发现,与无肝转移的患者相比,有肝转移的患者的反应率较低(8.7% 对 30.0%)。5 然而,CAPability-01 试验表明,无论是否有肝转移,三联疗法在 mCRC 中都具有卓越的疗效。因此,还需要进一步的研究来证实这些结果,并深入了解其潜在机制。在这些研究结果的基础上,一项多中心、随机、III 期试验--CAPability-02 已经启动,研究对象是一线治疗(包括以奥沙利铂为基础的化疗)失败的 MSS 型 CRC 患者。CAPability-01试验发现,在化疗难治的MSS/pMMR型CRC患者中,使用辛替利马单抗、奇达霉素和贝伐珠单抗的三联疗法能显著改善化疗双联疗法的PFS、ORR和DCR。三联疗法还创造了更活跃的免疫肿瘤微环境,增强了CD8 + T细胞浸润。研究结果表明,这种联合疗法可能是治疗晚期 CRC 的一种很有前景的方法,尤其是对于肝转移患者,因为传统上肝转移患者的治疗效果较差:构思(牵头);项目管理(相同);撰写-初稿(相同);撰写-审阅和编辑(相同)。余云芳:构思(等同);经费获取(等同);项目管理(等同);指导(主要)。两位作者均已阅读并批准最终稿件。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信