Amanda Vilar , Thaisa Marques Vicente , Maria Virginia Alves Martins , Silvia Helena de Mello e Sousa
{"title":"Benthic foraminifera biomass on the continental slope and São Paulo plateau of Santos Basin (SE Brazil): Comparison of different estimation methods","authors":"Amanda Vilar , Thaisa Marques Vicente , Maria Virginia Alves Martins , Silvia Helena de Mello e Sousa","doi":"10.1016/j.marmicro.2024.102396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The biomass of benthic foraminifera stands out in marine environments compared to other meiofaunal organisms. Estimating the biomass of these organisms is a valuable biotic descriptor for understanding the carbon cycle and the flow of particulate organic matter. This study estimates the biomass of benthic foraminifera on the slope and plateau of the Santos Basin (SE Brazil) using the biovolume and cytoplasmic occupancy methodology. This work applies a non-destructive biovolume method of estimating biomass by the direct visualization of cytoplasmic occupancy (DV) compared with pre-established (in the literature) percentages of cytoplasmic occupation of the test volume: an average of 32 % (GE) and 35 % (AL). Although there was no statistically significant difference (<em>p</em> < 0.05) between DV and cytoplasmic percentages, it is recognized that the calculation of GE and AL can bias the results. We, therefore, emphasize the need to assess biomass according to species composition and ultrastructural variability. The species with the biggest individuals (>250 μm) contributed most to biomass in the Santos Basin and are considered k-strategists. In contrast, the species with smaller specimens (250–63 μm) are considered r-strategists, contributing more to the density in the study area. This study highlights the discrepancy between the abundant species biomass results by measuring all specimens and the extrapolation of the population for less sample effort, probably due to biological (e.g. intra/inter species variations) and environmental (e.g. availability of food and oxygen) factors. Based on the ecology of the species, the biomass estimates seem to reveal a relationship with the quantity and quality of organic matter, which will be investigated in the future. Future studies should consider the internal structures and address potential errors resulting from cytoplasm dehydration when staining and drying are performed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49881,"journal":{"name":"Marine Micropaleontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Micropaleontology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377839824000665","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The biomass of benthic foraminifera stands out in marine environments compared to other meiofaunal organisms. Estimating the biomass of these organisms is a valuable biotic descriptor for understanding the carbon cycle and the flow of particulate organic matter. This study estimates the biomass of benthic foraminifera on the slope and plateau of the Santos Basin (SE Brazil) using the biovolume and cytoplasmic occupancy methodology. This work applies a non-destructive biovolume method of estimating biomass by the direct visualization of cytoplasmic occupancy (DV) compared with pre-established (in the literature) percentages of cytoplasmic occupation of the test volume: an average of 32 % (GE) and 35 % (AL). Although there was no statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between DV and cytoplasmic percentages, it is recognized that the calculation of GE and AL can bias the results. We, therefore, emphasize the need to assess biomass according to species composition and ultrastructural variability. The species with the biggest individuals (>250 μm) contributed most to biomass in the Santos Basin and are considered k-strategists. In contrast, the species with smaller specimens (250–63 μm) are considered r-strategists, contributing more to the density in the study area. This study highlights the discrepancy between the abundant species biomass results by measuring all specimens and the extrapolation of the population for less sample effort, probably due to biological (e.g. intra/inter species variations) and environmental (e.g. availability of food and oxygen) factors. Based on the ecology of the species, the biomass estimates seem to reveal a relationship with the quantity and quality of organic matter, which will be investigated in the future. Future studies should consider the internal structures and address potential errors resulting from cytoplasm dehydration when staining and drying are performed.
与其他小型底栖生物相比,底栖有孔虫的生物量在海洋环境中尤为突出。估算这些生物的生物量是了解碳循环和微粒有机物流的重要生物描述指标。本研究采用生物体积和细胞质占位法估算了桑托斯盆地(巴西东南部)斜坡和高原底栖有孔虫的生物量。这项研究采用非破坏性生物体积法,通过直接观察细胞质占据率(DV)与预先确定的(文献中的)测试体积细胞质占据率(平均为 32%(GE)和 35%(AL))进行比较,来估算生物量。虽然 DV 和细胞质百分比之间没有统计学意义上的显著差异(p < 0.05),但我们认识到,GE 和 AL 的计算可能会使结果出现偏差。因此,我们强调需要根据物种组成和超微结构变异来评估生物量。在桑托斯盆地,个体最大(250 μm)的物种对生物量的贡献最大,被认为是k-战略家。与此相反,个体较小(250-63 μm)的物种被认为是 r 型策略者,对研究区域的密度贡献较大。这项研究凸显了通过测量所有标本得出的丰富物种生物量结果与通过较少取样工作得出的种群推断结果之间的差异,这可能是由于生物(如物种内/物种间的差异)和环境(如食物和氧气的可用性)因素造成的。根据物种生态学,生物量估计值似乎揭示了与有机物的数量和质量之间的关系,今后将对此进行研究。未来的研究应考虑内部结构,并解决染色和干燥时细胞质脱水可能造成的误差。
期刊介绍:
Marine Micropaleontology is an international journal publishing original, innovative and significant scientific papers in all fields related to marine microfossils, including ecology and paleoecology, biology and paleobiology, paleoceanography and paleoclimatology, environmental monitoring, taphonomy, evolution and molecular phylogeny. The journal strongly encourages the publication of articles in which marine microfossils and/or their chemical composition are used to solve fundamental geological, environmental and biological problems. However, it does not publish purely stratigraphic or taxonomic papers. In Marine Micropaleontology, a special section is dedicated to short papers on new methods and protocols using marine microfossils. We solicit special issues on hot topics in marine micropaleontology and review articles on timely subjects.