Effects of therapeutic exercise on pain processing in people with chronic non-specific neck pain - A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Adriane Aguayo-Alves , Giovanna Laura Neves Antônio Gaban , Marcos Amaral de Noronha , Luiz Fernando Approbato Selistre
{"title":"Effects of therapeutic exercise on pain processing in people with chronic non-specific neck pain - A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Adriane Aguayo-Alves ,&nbsp;Giovanna Laura Neves Antônio Gaban ,&nbsp;Marcos Amaral de Noronha ,&nbsp;Luiz Fernando Approbato Selistre","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Emerging evidence suggests that individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain may experience altered sensory processing, potentially contributing to the modest response to therapeutic exercise treatments.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This systematic review aims to explore the effect of therapeutic exercise on pain processing among patients with chronic non-specific neck pain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search was conducted in multiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, SportDiscus, and Cochrane CENTRAL) from inception to June 2023. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing therapeutic exercise to non-exercise treatments or no treatment. The screening and data extraction was conducted by two reviewers. The methodological quality was evaluated using the PEDro scale and the certainty of evidence using GRADE. The primary outcomes assessed were pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirteen trials included a total of 948 participants, with 586 in the exercise therapy group and 362 in the non-exercise group. The therapeutic exercise was not superior to non-exercise treatments for both local and PPT in the immediate (MD = 0.13, 95%CI = −0.18 to 0.43), and short-term follow-up (MD = 0.17, 95%CI = −0.27 to 0.61). In the medium term, therapeutic exercise demonstrated a small effect size in increasing local PPT (Kg/cm2) (MD = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.08 to 1.19) compared to non-exercise interventions. The certainty of evidence for these outcomes was very low.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is very low certainty of evidence that therapeutic exercise is not superior than non-exercise treatment on pain processing in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781224002789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Emerging evidence suggests that individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain may experience altered sensory processing, potentially contributing to the modest response to therapeutic exercise treatments.

Objective

This systematic review aims to explore the effect of therapeutic exercise on pain processing among patients with chronic non-specific neck pain.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in multiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, SportDiscus, and Cochrane CENTRAL) from inception to June 2023. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing therapeutic exercise to non-exercise treatments or no treatment. The screening and data extraction was conducted by two reviewers. The methodological quality was evaluated using the PEDro scale and the certainty of evidence using GRADE. The primary outcomes assessed were pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation.

Results

Thirteen trials included a total of 948 participants, with 586 in the exercise therapy group and 362 in the non-exercise group. The therapeutic exercise was not superior to non-exercise treatments for both local and PPT in the immediate (MD = 0.13, 95%CI = −0.18 to 0.43), and short-term follow-up (MD = 0.17, 95%CI = −0.27 to 0.61). In the medium term, therapeutic exercise demonstrated a small effect size in increasing local PPT (Kg/cm2) (MD = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.08 to 1.19) compared to non-exercise interventions. The certainty of evidence for these outcomes was very low.

Conclusions

There is very low certainty of evidence that therapeutic exercise is not superior than non-exercise treatment on pain processing in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain.

治疗性运动对慢性非特异性颈痛患者疼痛处理的影响--系统回顾与荟萃分析
背景越来越多的证据表明,慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者的感觉处理可能会发生改变,这可能是导致治疗性运动疗法反应不大的原因之一。目的本系统综述旨在探讨治疗性运动对慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者疼痛处理的影响。方法从开始到 2023 年 6 月,在多个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、PEDro、SportDiscus 和 Cochrane CENTRAL)中进行了系统检索。纳入标准包括比较治疗性运动与非运动疗法或无疗法的随机对照试验(RCT)。筛选和数据提取由两名审稿人进行。方法学质量采用PEDro量表进行评估,证据的确定性采用GRADE进行评估。结果13项试验共纳入948名参与者,其中运动疗法组586人,非运动疗法组362人。在近期(MD = 0.13,95%CI = -0.18 至 0.43)和短期随访(MD = 0.17,95%CI = -0.27 至 0.61)中,治疗性运动在局部和 PPT 方面均不优于非运动疗法。从中期来看,与非运动干预相比,治疗性运动在提高局部 PPT(Kg/cm2)(MD = 0.64,95%CI = 0.08 至 1.19)方面的效果较小。这些结果的证据确定性很低。结论对于慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者的疼痛处理,治疗性运动并不比非运动疗法更有优势,这一证据的确定性很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信