Comparison of hypoallergenic knee arthroplasties in patients with metal hypersensitivity versus standard arthroplasties in non-hypersensitivity patients: A scoping review

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Christian Carulli, Filippo Leggieri, Domenico Rodà, Fabrizio Matassi, Roberto Civinini, Matteo Innocenti
{"title":"Comparison of hypoallergenic knee arthroplasties in patients with metal hypersensitivity versus standard arthroplasties in non-hypersensitivity patients: A scoping review","authors":"Christian Carulli,&nbsp;Filippo Leggieri,&nbsp;Domenico Rodà,&nbsp;Fabrizio Matassi,&nbsp;Roberto Civinini,&nbsp;Matteo Innocenti","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2024.09.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Metal hypersensitivity in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) continues to intrigue surgeons and researchers, with significant limitation of allergy tests due to the absence of clear cut-offs for a definitive diagnosis and their limited diffusion worldwide. We analyzed the literature to compare clinical outcomes in patients with metal hypersensitivity undergoing hypoallergenic knee arthroplasties and subjects without metal allergy undergoing standard knee arthroplasties.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This review adhered to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was conducted from inception to October 1st, 2023. Eligibility criteria included studies comparing clinical outcomes of hypoallergenic and standard knee arthroplasties in patients with and without metal hypersensitivity, respectively. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool. The primary outcome measure was the Knee Society Score (KSS). A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to account for heterogeneity, with results expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95 % confidence intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From an initial 1846 studies identified, six met the inclusion criteria after rigorous screening. The quantitative included 409 knee replacements from three studies, comprising 95 hypersensitive patients who received hypoallergenic TKA and 314 non-allergic patients who underwent standard CoCr implant procedures. Risk of bias assessment revealedmoderate risk or lower across all included studies. Analysis of the KSS yielded an overall effect size (SMD) of −0.18 (95 % CI: −0.54 to 0.18), slightly favoring standard knee arthroplasties. Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I<sup>2</sup> = 53 %, τ = 0.0526). The qualitative analysis included three studies. Significantly lower improvements were found in KSS, WOMAC, SF-12, and Euro-QoL-5D L-VAS among metal-sensitive patients. The third one reported no significant clinical differences between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The scoping analysis showed similar clinical outcome after hypoallergenic TKA in patients with metal hypersensitivity compared to standard knee implants in patients without metal allergy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X24003234/pdfft?md5=1187f2ab2f75e0736b5f248cc30dd5a2&pid=1-s2.0-S0972978X24003234-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X24003234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Metal hypersensitivity in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) continues to intrigue surgeons and researchers, with significant limitation of allergy tests due to the absence of clear cut-offs for a definitive diagnosis and their limited diffusion worldwide. We analyzed the literature to compare clinical outcomes in patients with metal hypersensitivity undergoing hypoallergenic knee arthroplasties and subjects without metal allergy undergoing standard knee arthroplasties.

Methods

This review adhered to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was conducted from inception to October 1st, 2023. Eligibility criteria included studies comparing clinical outcomes of hypoallergenic and standard knee arthroplasties in patients with and without metal hypersensitivity, respectively. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool. The primary outcome measure was the Knee Society Score (KSS). A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to account for heterogeneity, with results expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95 % confidence intervals.

Results

From an initial 1846 studies identified, six met the inclusion criteria after rigorous screening. The quantitative included 409 knee replacements from three studies, comprising 95 hypersensitive patients who received hypoallergenic TKA and 314 non-allergic patients who underwent standard CoCr implant procedures. Risk of bias assessment revealedmoderate risk or lower across all included studies. Analysis of the KSS yielded an overall effect size (SMD) of −0.18 (95 % CI: −0.54 to 0.18), slightly favoring standard knee arthroplasties. Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 53 %, τ = 0.0526). The qualitative analysis included three studies. Significantly lower improvements were found in KSS, WOMAC, SF-12, and Euro-QoL-5D L-VAS among metal-sensitive patients. The third one reported no significant clinical differences between groups.

Conclusion

The scoping analysis showed similar clinical outcome after hypoallergenic TKA in patients with metal hypersensitivity compared to standard knee implants in patients without metal allergy.

金属过敏症患者使用低过敏性膝关节置换术与非过敏症患者使用标准膝关节置换术的比较:范围综述
背景全膝关节置换术(TKA)中的金属过敏问题一直困扰着外科医生和研究人员,由于没有明确的分界线来确定诊断,过敏测试在全球范围内的推广也很有限。我们分析了相关文献,以比较接受低过敏性膝关节置换术的金属过敏症患者与接受标准膝关节置换术的无金属过敏症患者的临床结果。从开始到 2023 年 10 月 1 日,对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库进行了全面检索。资格标准包括比较低过敏性膝关节置换术和标准膝关节置换术对金属过敏患者和非金属过敏患者的临床疗效的研究。两名独立审稿人筛选研究、提取数据,并使用 ROBINS-I 工具评估偏倚风险。主要结果指标为膝关节社会评分(KSS)。结果在最初确定的 1846 项研究中,经过严格筛选,有 6 项符合纳入标准。定量研究包括三项研究中的 409 例膝关节置换术,其中 95 例过敏患者接受了低过敏性 TKA,314 例非过敏患者接受了标准 CoCr 植入手术。偏倚风险评估显示,所有纳入研究的偏倚风险均为中度或更低。KSS分析得出的总体效应大小(SMD)为-0.18(95 % CI:-0.54 至 0.18),标准膝关节置换术略胜一筹。观察到中度异质性(I2 = 53 %,τ = 0.0526)。定性分析包括三项研究。发现对金属敏感的患者在KSS、WOMAC、SF-12和Euro-QoL-5D L-VAS方面的改善程度明显较低。结论范围分析表明,与无金属过敏症的患者使用标准膝关节假体相比,金属过敏症患者使用低过敏性 TKA 后的临床疗效相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信