Feasibility of prehabilitation for patients awaiting total knee arthroplasty; a pilot study

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Louisa T.M.A. Mulder , Danielle D.P. Berghmans , Peter Z. Feczko , Rob A. de Bie , Antoine F. Lenssen
{"title":"Feasibility of prehabilitation for patients awaiting total knee arthroplasty; a pilot study","authors":"Louisa T.M.A. Mulder ,&nbsp;Danielle D.P. Berghmans ,&nbsp;Peter Z. Feczko ,&nbsp;Rob A. de Bie ,&nbsp;Antoine F. Lenssen","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2024.07.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the feasibility of conducting a preoperative home-based prehabilitation program for total knee arthroplasty patients at risk for delayed in-hospital recovery, and to explore the pre- and postoperative impact of this program.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study with matched controls, enabling subgroup analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Home-based.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><p>Patients awaiting primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty between 2019 and 2020, were compared with matched historic cases from 2016 to 2017. Matching criteria were scoring ≤17 points on the De Morton Mobility Index and &gt;12.5 s on the timed-up-and-go test.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Supervised home-based prehabilitation program versus no prehabilitation.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><p>Feasibility, determined by recruitment rate, adherence, and safety of the program. Preoperative impact, assessed for the intervention group by differences in mean values for aerobic capacity, muscle strength and functional mobility between the first and last sessions. Postoperative impact was defined as the time needed to achieve in-hospital independence of physical function and was measured by the differences in mean values between the intervention and control groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Recruitment rate was 71 %; adherence and drop-out rates were 88 % and 12 % respectively. No adverse events were reported. Preoperatively, the intervention group showed significant improvements in aerobic capacity on the 2-min walking test (84.29 m–98.06 m; p = 0.007) and 2-min step test (40.35 steps to 52.95 steps; p = 0.014), muscle strength on the 30 s chair stand test (7.3 stands to 10.1 stands; p = 0.002), and functional mobility as seen in the timed-up-and-go-test (19.52 s–15.85 s; p = 0.031). Postoperatively, the intervention group achieved in-hospital independence of physical function earlier (mean rank 16.11) than the control group (mean rank 24.89; p=&lt;0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>It is feasible to conduct a prehabilitation program 4–6 weeks preoperatively, for high-risk patients awaiting total knee arthroplasty. Additionally, the program appears to have a positive impact on physical fitness both pre- and postoperatively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X24002885/pdfft?md5=493f06159ba8439deeeddcc5b1045f40&pid=1-s2.0-S0972978X24002885-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X24002885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine the feasibility of conducting a preoperative home-based prehabilitation program for total knee arthroplasty patients at risk for delayed in-hospital recovery, and to explore the pre- and postoperative impact of this program.

Design

A retrospective cohort study with matched controls, enabling subgroup analyses.

Setting

Home-based.

Subjects

Patients awaiting primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty between 2019 and 2020, were compared with matched historic cases from 2016 to 2017. Matching criteria were scoring ≤17 points on the De Morton Mobility Index and >12.5 s on the timed-up-and-go test.

Intervention

Supervised home-based prehabilitation program versus no prehabilitation.

Outcomes

Feasibility, determined by recruitment rate, adherence, and safety of the program. Preoperative impact, assessed for the intervention group by differences in mean values for aerobic capacity, muscle strength and functional mobility between the first and last sessions. Postoperative impact was defined as the time needed to achieve in-hospital independence of physical function and was measured by the differences in mean values between the intervention and control groups.

Results

Recruitment rate was 71 %; adherence and drop-out rates were 88 % and 12 % respectively. No adverse events were reported. Preoperatively, the intervention group showed significant improvements in aerobic capacity on the 2-min walking test (84.29 m–98.06 m; p = 0.007) and 2-min step test (40.35 steps to 52.95 steps; p = 0.014), muscle strength on the 30 s chair stand test (7.3 stands to 10.1 stands; p = 0.002), and functional mobility as seen in the timed-up-and-go-test (19.52 s–15.85 s; p = 0.031). Postoperatively, the intervention group achieved in-hospital independence of physical function earlier (mean rank 16.11) than the control group (mean rank 24.89; p=<0.01).

Conclusions

It is feasible to conduct a prehabilitation program 4–6 weeks preoperatively, for high-risk patients awaiting total knee arthroplasty. Additionally, the program appears to have a positive impact on physical fitness both pre- and postoperatively.

为等待进行全膝关节置换术的患者提供预康复训练的可行性;一项试点研究
目的研究对有院内康复延迟风险的全膝关节置换术患者实施术前家庭康复计划的可行性,并探讨该计划在术前和术后的影响.设计回顾性队列研究,配对对照,可进行亚组分析.设置以家庭为基础.受试者将2019年至2020年期间等待进行初级单侧全膝关节置换术的患者与2016年至2017年的配对历史病例进行比较。匹配标准为De Morton活动指数得分≤17分,定时起立行走测试得分>12.5秒.干预有监督的家庭康复计划与无康复计划.结果可行性,由招募率、坚持率和计划的安全性决定。术前影响,根据干预组在第一次和最后一次训练之间有氧能力、肌肉力量和功能活动度平均值的差异进行评估。术后影响被定义为实现院内肢体功能独立所需的时间,以干预组和对照组之间平均值的差异来衡量。无不良事件报告。术前,干预组在 2 分钟步行测试(84.29 米至 98.06 米;p = 0.007)和 2 分钟台阶测试(40.35 步至 52.95 步;p = 0.014)中的有氧能力、30 秒椅子站立测试(7.3 站至 10.1 站;p = 0.002)中的肌肉力量以及定时站立行走测试(19.52 秒至 15.85 秒;p = 0.031)中的功能移动能力方面均有显著改善。结论对于等待进行全膝关节置换术的高风险患者,在术前 4-6 周进行术前康复训练是可行的。此外,该计划似乎对术前和术后的体能都有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信