Simulated bupivacaine pharmacokinetics after labor epidural analgesia followed by transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine for intrapartum cesarean delivery

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Daniel Katz MD , Jia Song MS , Matthew Carangelo PharmD , Timothy Bergsma PhD , Roy Winston MD , Ruth Landau MD
{"title":"Simulated bupivacaine pharmacokinetics after labor epidural analgesia followed by transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine for intrapartum cesarean delivery","authors":"Daniel Katz MD ,&nbsp;Jia Song MS ,&nbsp;Matthew Carangelo PharmD ,&nbsp;Timothy Bergsma PhD ,&nbsp;Roy Winston MD ,&nbsp;Ruth Landau MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><p>To simulate bupivacaine pharmacokinetics in scenarios of labor epidural analgesia (LEA) extended for intrapartum cesarean delivery (CD) with epidural or intrathecal boluses, followed by transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for postcesarean analgesia.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Bupivacaine plasma concentrations were simulated using a 2-compartment distribution model fit to previous study data.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Virtual pharmacokinetic simulations.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Virtual individuals (1000, each scenario) had uniform weight (80 kg) but varying absorption parameters.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>The 6 scenarios varied in LEA infusion duration (6 or 24 h), local anesthetic used for bolus to extend LEA (epidural lidocaine or intrathecal bupivacaine), TAP block regimen, and time between bolus and TAP block.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>Scenario outcomes included geometric mean (GM) peak bupivacaine plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) with 95% prediction interval (PI), median (range) C<sub>max</sub>, and number of virtual individuals (per 1000) with C<sub>max</sub> reaching estimated toxicity thresholds (neurotoxicity: 2000 μg/L; cardiotoxicity: 4000 μg/L).</p></div><div><h3>Main Results</h3><p>In simulated scenarios of LEA infusion for 24 h with an epidural bolus of lidocaine 400 mg for CD followed 1 h later by TAP block, the GM C<sub>max</sub> for the scenarios with TAP blocks including either LB 266 mg plus bupivacaine hydrochloride 52 mg or bupivacaine hydrochloride 104 mg was 1860 (95% PI, 1107–3124) and 1851 (95% PI, 1085–3157) μg/L, respectively. Among 1000 virtual individuals for each scenario, 404 and 401 had C<sub>max</sub> reaching 2000 μg/L, respectively; 1 and 0 had C<sub>max</sub> reaching 4000 μg/L, respectively. For other scenarios, GM C<sub>max</sub> remained &lt;1000 μg/L.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Across 6 different simulations of TAP blocks for intrapartum CD analgesia, LEA with bupivacaine (with or without boluses for extension and including a conservative modeling of lidocaine without epinephrine), followed by TAP block with LB and/or bupivacaine hydrochloride 0, 1, or 2 h after CD, is unlikely to result in bupivacaine plasma concentrations reaching local anesthetic systemic toxicity thresholds in healthy patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 111589"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002186/pdfft?md5=f1d5494a994edd8d9960ef488f753444&pid=1-s2.0-S0952818024002186-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002186","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study Objective

To simulate bupivacaine pharmacokinetics in scenarios of labor epidural analgesia (LEA) extended for intrapartum cesarean delivery (CD) with epidural or intrathecal boluses, followed by transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for postcesarean analgesia.

Design

Bupivacaine plasma concentrations were simulated using a 2-compartment distribution model fit to previous study data.

Setting

Virtual pharmacokinetic simulations.

Patients

Virtual individuals (1000, each scenario) had uniform weight (80 kg) but varying absorption parameters.

Interventions

The 6 scenarios varied in LEA infusion duration (6 or 24 h), local anesthetic used for bolus to extend LEA (epidural lidocaine or intrathecal bupivacaine), TAP block regimen, and time between bolus and TAP block.

Measurements

Scenario outcomes included geometric mean (GM) peak bupivacaine plasma concentration (Cmax) with 95% prediction interval (PI), median (range) Cmax, and number of virtual individuals (per 1000) with Cmax reaching estimated toxicity thresholds (neurotoxicity: 2000 μg/L; cardiotoxicity: 4000 μg/L).

Main Results

In simulated scenarios of LEA infusion for 24 h with an epidural bolus of lidocaine 400 mg for CD followed 1 h later by TAP block, the GM Cmax for the scenarios with TAP blocks including either LB 266 mg plus bupivacaine hydrochloride 52 mg or bupivacaine hydrochloride 104 mg was 1860 (95% PI, 1107–3124) and 1851 (95% PI, 1085–3157) μg/L, respectively. Among 1000 virtual individuals for each scenario, 404 and 401 had Cmax reaching 2000 μg/L, respectively; 1 and 0 had Cmax reaching 4000 μg/L, respectively. For other scenarios, GM Cmax remained <1000 μg/L.

Conclusions

Across 6 different simulations of TAP blocks for intrapartum CD analgesia, LEA with bupivacaine (with or without boluses for extension and including a conservative modeling of lidocaine without epinephrine), followed by TAP block with LB and/or bupivacaine hydrochloride 0, 1, or 2 h after CD, is unlikely to result in bupivacaine plasma concentrations reaching local anesthetic systemic toxicity thresholds in healthy patients.

分娩硬膜外镇痛后使用脂质体布比卡因进行腹横肌平面阻滞以进行产内剖宫产的模拟布比卡因药代动力学研究
研究目的模拟分娩硬膜外镇痛(LEA)情景下布比卡因的药代动力学,通过硬膜外或鞘内栓剂延长产后剖宫产(CD)的时间,然后用脂质体布比卡因(LB)阻滞腹横肌平面(TAP)进行剖宫产后镇痛。患者虚拟个体(1000 人,每种情景)体重相同(80 千克),但吸收参数各异。干预措施6 种情景的 LEA 输注持续时间(6 或 24 小时)、用于延长 LEA 的栓剂局麻药(硬膜外利多卡因或鞘内布比卡因)、TAP 阻滞方案以及栓剂和 TAP 阻滞之间的时间各不相同。测量情景结果包括布比卡因血浆浓度(Cmax)的几何平均(GM)峰值和 95% 预测区间(PI)、Cmax 中位数(范围)以及 Cmax 达到估计毒性阈值(神经毒性:2000 μg/L;心脏毒性:4000 μg/L)的虚拟人数(每 1000 人)。主要结果在 LEA 输注 24 小时,硬膜外注射利多卡因 400 毫克用于 CD,1 小时后进行 TAP 阻滞的模拟方案中,TAP 阻滞方案(包括 LB 266 毫克加盐酸布比卡因 52 毫克或盐酸布比卡因 104 毫克)的 GM Cmax 分别为 1860(95% PI,1107-3124)和 1851(95% PI,1085-3157)微克/升。在每种方案的 1000 个虚拟个体中,分别有 404 和 401 人的 Cmax 达到 2000 μg/L;分别有 1 和 0 人的 Cmax 达到 4000 μg/L。在其他情况下,GM Cmax 仍为 1000 μg/L。结论通过 6 种不同的产前 CD 镇痛 TAP 阻滞模拟,在 CD 结束后 0、1 或 2 小时使用布比卡因进行 LEA(使用或不使用栓剂进行扩展,包括不使用肾上腺素的利多卡因保守模型),然后使用 LB 和/或盐酸布比卡因进行 TAP 阻滞,不太可能导致健康患者的布比卡因血浆浓度达到局麻药全身毒性阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信