Addressing the challenges of complex type III odontoid fractures: Clinical and radiological outcomes of various treatment modalities

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Mahmoud Fouad Ibrahim, Mohammad Osama, Amr Hatem, Mohammad El-Sharkawi
{"title":"Addressing the challenges of complex type III odontoid fractures: Clinical and radiological outcomes of various treatment modalities","authors":"Mahmoud Fouad Ibrahim,&nbsp;Mohammad Osama,&nbsp;Amr Hatem,&nbsp;Mohammad El-Sharkawi","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2024.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Unlike simple fractures, complex Type III odontoid fractures—characterized by intricate morphology and pathomechanics—pose significant management challenges. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of conservative and surgical treatment modalities for these complex fractures, with a focus on assessing factors influencing fracture union.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Following approval of our institutional review board, this retrospective observational cohort study was conducted. All Patients with complex Type III odontoid fractures who were managed at our center from June 2016 to December 2022 were assessed for eligibility. The primary outcome was union status. Secondary outcomes included the ASIA impairment scale, neck disability index (NDI), and complications. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for adverse union outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 39 patients were included in the final analysis, with a mean age of 36.10 years. Nine patients were managed conservatively, 12 patients underwent anterior odontoid screw (AOS) fixation, and 18 patients received posterior fusion (PF). The rate of bony union varied significantly across the treatment groups, 100 % in the PF group, 58 % in the AOS group and 22 % in the conservative group (p = 0.0012). The NDI revealed superior functional outcomes in the PF group compared to the other groups (p = 0.0436). Failure of primary treatment was observed in seven patients (three from the conservative group and four from the AOS), necessitating secondary treatment with PF. Lateral mass gap &gt;2 mm, coronal tilt &gt;5°, and atlantoaxial instability &gt;50 % were identified as significant risk factors for adverse union outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Surgical treatment, particularly PF, offers superior outcomes in terms of union rates and functional recovery for complex Type III odontoid fractures. The identification of specific radiological measurements as significant risk factors for non-union underscores the need for detailed imaging and careful patient selection for conservative versus surgical management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X24002988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Unlike simple fractures, complex Type III odontoid fractures—characterized by intricate morphology and pathomechanics—pose significant management challenges. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of conservative and surgical treatment modalities for these complex fractures, with a focus on assessing factors influencing fracture union.

Methods

Following approval of our institutional review board, this retrospective observational cohort study was conducted. All Patients with complex Type III odontoid fractures who were managed at our center from June 2016 to December 2022 were assessed for eligibility. The primary outcome was union status. Secondary outcomes included the ASIA impairment scale, neck disability index (NDI), and complications. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for adverse union outcomes.

Results

A total of 39 patients were included in the final analysis, with a mean age of 36.10 years. Nine patients were managed conservatively, 12 patients underwent anterior odontoid screw (AOS) fixation, and 18 patients received posterior fusion (PF). The rate of bony union varied significantly across the treatment groups, 100 % in the PF group, 58 % in the AOS group and 22 % in the conservative group (p = 0.0012). The NDI revealed superior functional outcomes in the PF group compared to the other groups (p = 0.0436). Failure of primary treatment was observed in seven patients (three from the conservative group and four from the AOS), necessitating secondary treatment with PF. Lateral mass gap >2 mm, coronal tilt >5°, and atlantoaxial instability >50 % were identified as significant risk factors for adverse union outcomes.

Conclusions

Surgical treatment, particularly PF, offers superior outcomes in terms of union rates and functional recovery for complex Type III odontoid fractures. The identification of specific radiological measurements as significant risk factors for non-union underscores the need for detailed imaging and careful patient selection for conservative versus surgical management.

应对复杂 III 型蝶骨骨折的挑战:各种治疗方法的临床和放射学效果
背景与简单骨折不同,复杂的III型蝶骨骨折具有复杂的形态和病理力学特征,给治疗带来了巨大挑战。本研究旨在评估这些复杂骨折的保守治疗和手术治疗的临床和放射学结果,重点是评估影响骨折愈合的因素。2016年6月至2022年12月期间在本中心接受治疗的所有复杂III型蝶骨骨折患者均接受了资格评估。主要结果是骨结合状况。次要结果包括 ASIA 损伤量表、颈部残疾指数(NDI)和并发症。结果 共有39名患者纳入最终分析,平均年龄为36.10岁。9名患者接受了保守治疗,12名患者接受了蝶骨前螺钉(AOS)固定,18名患者接受了后路融合(PF)。各治疗组的骨结合率差异显著,PF 组为 100%,AOS 组为 58%,保守治疗组为 22%(P = 0.0012)。NDI显示,PF组的功能结果优于其他组(p = 0.0436)。有 7 名患者(3 名来自保守治疗组,4 名来自 AOS 治疗组)的初级治疗失败,需要使用 PF 进行二次治疗。外侧肿块间隙 2 mm、冠状面倾斜 5°、寰枢椎不稳定 50% 被认为是导致骨折愈合不良的重要风险因素。特定的放射学测量结果是导致骨折不愈合的重要风险因素,这强调了在保守治疗和手术治疗之间,需要进行详细的影像学检查和仔细选择患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信