Patellar resurfacing in contemporary total knee arthroplasty: Frequency of complications in a matched cohort

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Hassan Farooq , William Oetojo , Safi Bajwa , Nicholas M. Brown
{"title":"Patellar resurfacing in contemporary total knee arthroplasty: Frequency of complications in a matched cohort","authors":"Hassan Farooq ,&nbsp;William Oetojo ,&nbsp;Safi Bajwa ,&nbsp;Nicholas M. Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Optimum patient selection and outcomes following patellar resurfacing are ongoing debates amongst the arthroplasty community. This study compared the outcomes of patients who had a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with patellar resurfacing to those left with their native patella.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review of 1941 TKAs performed between 2016 and 2020 was conducted. 41 TKAs without patellar resurfacing <em>and</em> with 2-years of minimum follow-up were identified. Of these, 38 TKAs were matched on age (exact), sex (exact), and body mass index (±10) to 38 TKAs that had patellar resurfacing. The indications for patella resurfacing were subjective based upon the surgeon preference and assessment of cartilage quality. Paired t-tests and chi-square tests were used for analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was 1 major patellofemoral complication in both the resurfaced group (patellar fracture) and the non-resurfaced group (patellar tendon tear), requiring nonoperative management and revision surgery, respectively. However, in the non-resurfaced group there were 4 cases of subjective patellofemoral pain compared to none in the resurfaced group (p = 0.37). Additionally, 3 non-resurfaced patients required manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) compared to none in the resurfaced group (p = 0.44).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>There was no difference in the frequency of major patella-specific complications between the groups. However, there was a non-statistically significant trend towards increased patellofemoral pain and MUA in the non-resurfaced group. Based on this study both methods of treatment remain viable options, but the trend towards increased pain and stiffness should continue to be closely evaluated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X24003118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Optimum patient selection and outcomes following patellar resurfacing are ongoing debates amongst the arthroplasty community. This study compared the outcomes of patients who had a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with patellar resurfacing to those left with their native patella.

Methods

A retrospective review of 1941 TKAs performed between 2016 and 2020 was conducted. 41 TKAs without patellar resurfacing and with 2-years of minimum follow-up were identified. Of these, 38 TKAs were matched on age (exact), sex (exact), and body mass index (±10) to 38 TKAs that had patellar resurfacing. The indications for patella resurfacing were subjective based upon the surgeon preference and assessment of cartilage quality. Paired t-tests and chi-square tests were used for analysis.

Results

There was 1 major patellofemoral complication in both the resurfaced group (patellar fracture) and the non-resurfaced group (patellar tendon tear), requiring nonoperative management and revision surgery, respectively. However, in the non-resurfaced group there were 4 cases of subjective patellofemoral pain compared to none in the resurfaced group (p = 0.37). Additionally, 3 non-resurfaced patients required manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) compared to none in the resurfaced group (p = 0.44).

Discussion

There was no difference in the frequency of major patella-specific complications between the groups. However, there was a non-statistically significant trend towards increased patellofemoral pain and MUA in the non-resurfaced group. Based on this study both methods of treatment remain viable options, but the trend towards increased pain and stiffness should continue to be closely evaluated.

当代全膝关节置换术中的髌骨复位:匹配队列中的并发症发生率
导言髌骨置换术后患者的最佳选择和疗效一直是关节置换术界争论的焦点。本研究比较了髌骨重置的全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者与保留原生髌骨的患者的治疗效果。确定了 41 例未进行髌骨复位且随访时间至少为 2 年的 TKA。其中,38 例 TKAs 与 38 例进行了髌骨再植的 TKAs 在年龄(精确值)、性别(精确值)和体重指数(±10)方面进行了匹配。髌骨再植的适应症是根据外科医生的偏好和软骨质量评估得出的主观判断。结果髌骨重置组(髌骨骨折)和非髌骨重置组(髌腱撕裂)都出现了一种主要的髌股关节并发症,分别需要进行非手术治疗和翻修手术。不过,未铺设髌骨组有 4 例主观髌骨股骨疼痛,而铺设髌骨组则没有(P = 0.37)。讨论两组患者发生髌骨特异性主要并发症的频率没有差异。然而,未重铺髌骨组的髌骨疼痛和 MUA 有增加的趋势,但无统计学意义。根据这项研究,两种治疗方法仍然是可行的选择,但应继续密切评估疼痛和僵硬增加的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信