{"title":"Numerical modeling of site response at large strains with simplified nonlinear models: Application to Lotung seismic array","authors":"Francesco Di Buccio, Alessandro Pagliaroli","doi":"10.1515/geo-2022-0627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Site response analyses at large strains are routinely carried out neglecting the shear strength of soil and the stiffness degradation due to the increase in pore pressures, leading to unrealistic predictions of the seismic response of soil deposits. The study investigates the performance of a simplified nonlinear (NL) approach, implemented in the Deepsoil code, constituted by coupling a hyperbolic model incorporating shear strength with a strain-based semi-empirical pore pressure generation model. The first part of the study, based on a large one-dimensional parametric study, shows that above a shear strain of 0.1%, it is necessary to include shear strength in the site response modelling to get more realistic results. Then, the approach has been evaluated with reference to the well-known downhole Large-Scale Seismic Test array located in Lotung (Taiwan): numerical results have been compared with recordings in terms of acceleration response spectra and pore water pressure time histories at different depths along the soil profiles. The comparison shows that the NL simplified model is characterized by an accuracy comparable with more sophisticated advanced elasto-plastic NL analyses adopting essentially the same input data of the traditional equivalent linear approaches(shear modulus and damping curves) and simple physical-mechanical properties routinely determined during geotechnical surveys (i.e., shear strength, relative density, fine content). This approach is therefore recommended for site response analyses reaching large strains (i.e., soft soil deposits and moderate-to-high input motions).","PeriodicalId":48712,"journal":{"name":"Open Geosciences","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Site response analyses at large strains are routinely carried out neglecting the shear strength of soil and the stiffness degradation due to the increase in pore pressures, leading to unrealistic predictions of the seismic response of soil deposits. The study investigates the performance of a simplified nonlinear (NL) approach, implemented in the Deepsoil code, constituted by coupling a hyperbolic model incorporating shear strength with a strain-based semi-empirical pore pressure generation model. The first part of the study, based on a large one-dimensional parametric study, shows that above a shear strain of 0.1%, it is necessary to include shear strength in the site response modelling to get more realistic results. Then, the approach has been evaluated with reference to the well-known downhole Large-Scale Seismic Test array located in Lotung (Taiwan): numerical results have been compared with recordings in terms of acceleration response spectra and pore water pressure time histories at different depths along the soil profiles. The comparison shows that the NL simplified model is characterized by an accuracy comparable with more sophisticated advanced elasto-plastic NL analyses adopting essentially the same input data of the traditional equivalent linear approaches(shear modulus and damping curves) and simple physical-mechanical properties routinely determined during geotechnical surveys (i.e., shear strength, relative density, fine content). This approach is therefore recommended for site response analyses reaching large strains (i.e., soft soil deposits and moderate-to-high input motions).
期刊介绍:
Open Geosciences (formerly Central European Journal of Geosciences - CEJG) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research results from all fields of Earth Sciences such as: Atmospheric Sciences, Geology, Geophysics, Geography, Oceanography and Hydrology, Glaciology, Speleology, Volcanology, Soil Science, Palaeoecology, Geotourism, Geoinformatics, Geostatistics.