Protective antibody concentrations in primary immunodeficiency following infusion with 5% or 10% intravenous immunoglobulin.

Martyn Paddick,Kim Clark,Eric Wolford,John More
{"title":"Protective antibody concentrations in primary immunodeficiency following infusion with 5% or 10% intravenous immunoglobulin.","authors":"Martyn Paddick,Kim Clark,Eric Wolford,John More","doi":"10.2500/aap.2024.45.240033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nInadequate production of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies renders patients with primary immunodeficiencysusceptible to infection by numerous pathogens, some of which can lead to severe asthma exacerbation and possible death. These patients who are immunocompromised are often reliant on intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapies, which provide passive antibodies against various respiratory pathogens, including measles virus and encapsulated bacteria.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nWe conducted a subanalysis of data from a multicenter, multinational, phase III, open-label bioequivalencestudy to compare protective concentrations of IgG antibodies provided by a 5% and a 10% IVIG product in patients with primaryimmunodeficiency.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nPatients on stable 21- or 28-day regimens of previous IVIG products were assigned to receive study treatment (adults: 5% IVIG and 10% IVIG; children: 10% IVIG) at doses of 300-800 mg/kg per infusion. Trough concentrations of total IgG, IgG subclasses, measles-neutralizing antibodies, and IgG against Haemophilus influenzae type b and Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes were evaluated.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 48 patients (33 adults ages 16-55 years; 15 children ages 2-15 years) were enrolled and received treatment.No statistically significant differences in trough concentrations of total IgG, IgG subclasses, measles neutralizing antibodies, or IgG directed at encapsulated bacteria were observed between the 5% and 10% formulations in analyses by age (adult or pediatric) or infusion schedule (every 21 or 28 days). All evaluated patients had trough IgG concentrations above accepted thresholds for protection against disease.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThese findings support the conclusion that, at dose levels and infusion schedules prescribed in clinical practice,this 5% and 10% IVIG product provided consistent, predictable, and bioequivalent IgG concentrations for adult and pediatricpatients with primary immunodeficiency disease. Both formulations delivered trough antibody concentrations of total IgG, measles- neutralizing antibodies, and antibodies against encapsulated bacteria that are above thresholds accepted as protective.","PeriodicalId":520163,"journal":{"name":"Allergy & Asthma Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy & Asthma Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2024.45.240033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Inadequate production of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies renders patients with primary immunodeficiencysusceptible to infection by numerous pathogens, some of which can lead to severe asthma exacerbation and possible death. These patients who are immunocompromised are often reliant on intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapies, which provide passive antibodies against various respiratory pathogens, including measles virus and encapsulated bacteria. OBJECTIVE We conducted a subanalysis of data from a multicenter, multinational, phase III, open-label bioequivalencestudy to compare protective concentrations of IgG antibodies provided by a 5% and a 10% IVIG product in patients with primaryimmunodeficiency. METHODS Patients on stable 21- or 28-day regimens of previous IVIG products were assigned to receive study treatment (adults: 5% IVIG and 10% IVIG; children: 10% IVIG) at doses of 300-800 mg/kg per infusion. Trough concentrations of total IgG, IgG subclasses, measles-neutralizing antibodies, and IgG against Haemophilus influenzae type b and Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 48 patients (33 adults ages 16-55 years; 15 children ages 2-15 years) were enrolled and received treatment.No statistically significant differences in trough concentrations of total IgG, IgG subclasses, measles neutralizing antibodies, or IgG directed at encapsulated bacteria were observed between the 5% and 10% formulations in analyses by age (adult or pediatric) or infusion schedule (every 21 or 28 days). All evaluated patients had trough IgG concentrations above accepted thresholds for protection against disease. CONCLUSION These findings support the conclusion that, at dose levels and infusion schedules prescribed in clinical practice,this 5% and 10% IVIG product provided consistent, predictable, and bioequivalent IgG concentrations for adult and pediatricpatients with primary immunodeficiency disease. Both formulations delivered trough antibody concentrations of total IgG, measles- neutralizing antibodies, and antibodies against encapsulated bacteria that are above thresholds accepted as protective.
原发性免疫缺陷症患者输注 5% 或 10% 静脉注射免疫球蛋白后的保护性抗体浓度。
背景由于免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)抗体生成不足,原发性免疫缺陷患者易受多种病原体感染,其中一些病原体可导致严重的哮喘恶化,甚至死亡。这些免疫力低下的患者通常依赖静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)疗法,这种疗法可提供针对各种呼吸道病原体(包括麻疹病毒和包裹细菌)的被动抗体。目的我们对一项多中心、跨国、III 期、开放标签生物等效性研究的数据进行了子分析,以比较 5% 和 10% IVIG 产品在原发性免疫缺陷患者中提供的 IgG 抗体的保护性浓度。方法患者在使用以前的 IVIG 产品 21 天或 28 天稳定疗程后,被分配接受研究治疗(成人:5% IVIG 和 10% IVIG;儿童:10% IVIG),每次输注剂量为 300-800 mg/kg。结果共有 48 名患者(33 名成人,16-55 岁;15 名儿童,2-15 岁)接受了治疗。在按年龄(成人或儿童)或输注时间(每 21 天或 28 天)进行的分析中,未观察到 5%和 10%制剂的总 IgG、IgG 亚类、麻疹中和抗体或针对包裹细菌的 IgG 的谷浓度有明显统计学差异。所有接受评估的患者的谷值 IgG 浓度均高于可接受的疾病保护阈值。这些研究结果支持以下结论:在临床实践中规定的剂量水平和输注时间下,5% 和 10% IVIG 产品可为成人和儿科原发性免疫缺陷病患者提供一致、可预测和生物等效的 IgG 浓度。这两种制剂所产生的总 IgG、麻疹中和抗体和抗包裹细菌抗体的谷值抗体浓度均高于公认的保护性阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信