On Robustness to $k$-wise Independence of Optimal Bayesian Mechanisms

Nick Gravin, Zhiqi Wang
{"title":"On Robustness to $k$-wise Independence of Optimal Bayesian Mechanisms","authors":"Nick Gravin, Zhiqi Wang","doi":"arxiv-2409.08547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reexamines the classic problem of revenue maximization in\nsingle-item auctions with $n$ buyers under the lens of the robust optimization\nframework. The celebrated Myerson's mechanism is the format that maximizes the\nseller's revenue under the prior distribution, which is mutually independent\nacross all $n$ buyers. As argued in a recent line of work (Caragiannis et al.\n22), (Dughmi et al. 24), mutual independence is a strong assumption that is\nextremely hard to verify statistically, thus it is important to relax the\nassumption. While optimal under mutual independent prior, we find that Myerson's\nmechanism may lose almost all of its revenue when the independence assumption\nis relaxed to pairwise independence, i.e., Myerson's mechanism is not\npairwise-robust. The mechanism regains robustness when the prior is assumed to\nbe 3-wise independent. In contrast, we show that second-price auctions with\nanonymous reserve, including optimal auctions under i.i.d. priors, lose at most\na constant fraction of their revenues on any regular pairwise independent\nprior. Our findings draw a comprehensive picture of robustness to $k$-wise\nindependence in single-item auction settings.","PeriodicalId":501316,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reexamines the classic problem of revenue maximization in single-item auctions with $n$ buyers under the lens of the robust optimization framework. The celebrated Myerson's mechanism is the format that maximizes the seller's revenue under the prior distribution, which is mutually independent across all $n$ buyers. As argued in a recent line of work (Caragiannis et al. 22), (Dughmi et al. 24), mutual independence is a strong assumption that is extremely hard to verify statistically, thus it is important to relax the assumption. While optimal under mutual independent prior, we find that Myerson's mechanism may lose almost all of its revenue when the independence assumption is relaxed to pairwise independence, i.e., Myerson's mechanism is not pairwise-robust. The mechanism regains robustness when the prior is assumed to be 3-wise independent. In contrast, we show that second-price auctions with anonymous reserve, including optimal auctions under i.i.d. priors, lose at most a constant fraction of their revenues on any regular pairwise independent prior. Our findings draw a comprehensive picture of robustness to $k$-wise independence in single-item auction settings.
论最优贝叶斯机制的 $k$-wise 独立性的鲁棒性
本文在稳健优化框架的视角下重新审视了有 n 个买家的单品拍卖中收益最大化的经典问题。著名的迈尔森机制是在先验分布下使卖方收益最大化的形式,而先验分布在所有 $n$ 买方中是相互独立的。正如最近的一些研究(Caragiannis et al.22)和(Dughmi et al.24)所指出的,相互独立是一个很强的假设,在统计上极难验证,因此放宽这一假设非常重要。我们发现,虽然迈尔森机制在相互独立的先验条件下是最优的,但当独立性假设放宽到成对独立性时,迈尔森机制可能会失去几乎所有的收益,也就是说,迈尔森机制并不是成对稳健的。当先验假定为三向独立时,该机制就会恢复稳健性。与此相反,我们证明了带有匿名储备金的二次定价拍卖(包括在 i.i.d. 先验下的最优拍卖)在任何常规的成对独立先验下最多损失其收入的固定部分。我们的发现全面描绘了在单项拍卖中$k$智独立的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信