State of the art medical devices for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS): technical review and future developments

Alessandra Preziosi, Cecilia Cirelli, Dale Waterhouse, Laura Privitera, Paolo De Coppi, Stefano Giuliani
{"title":"State of the art medical devices for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS): technical review and future developments","authors":"Alessandra Preziosi, Cecilia Cirelli, Dale Waterhouse, Laura Privitera, Paolo De Coppi, Stefano Giuliani","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11236-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Medical devices for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) are becoming available at a fast pace. The main challenge for surgeons lies in the lack of in-depth knowledge of optical imaging, different technical specifications and poor standardisation, and the selection of the best device based on clinical application.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This manuscript aims to provide an up-to-date description of the commercially available fluorescence imaging platforms by comparing their mode of use, required settings, image types, compatible fluorophores, regulatory approval, and cost. We obtained this information by performing a broad literature search on PubMed and by contacting medical companies directly. The data for this review were collected up to November 2023.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Thirty-two devices made by 19 medical companies were identified. Ten systems are surgical microscopes, 5 can be used for both open and minimally invasive surgery (MIS), 6 can only be used for open surgery, and 10 only for MIS. One is a fluorescence system available for the Da Vinci robot. Nineteen devices can provide an overlay between fluorescence and white light image. All devices are compatible with Indocyanine Green, the most common fluorescence dye used intraoperatively. There is significant variability in the hardware and software of each device, which resulted in different sensitivity, fluorescence intensity, and image quality. All devices are CE-mark regulated, and 30 were FDA-approved.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>There is a prolific market of devices for FGS and healthcare professionals should have basic knowledge of their technical specifications to use it at best for each clinical indication. Standardisation across devices must be a priority in the field of FGS, and it will enhance external validity for future clinical trials in the field.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11236-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Medical devices for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) are becoming available at a fast pace. The main challenge for surgeons lies in the lack of in-depth knowledge of optical imaging, different technical specifications and poor standardisation, and the selection of the best device based on clinical application.

Methods

This manuscript aims to provide an up-to-date description of the commercially available fluorescence imaging platforms by comparing their mode of use, required settings, image types, compatible fluorophores, regulatory approval, and cost. We obtained this information by performing a broad literature search on PubMed and by contacting medical companies directly. The data for this review were collected up to November 2023.

Results

Thirty-two devices made by 19 medical companies were identified. Ten systems are surgical microscopes, 5 can be used for both open and minimally invasive surgery (MIS), 6 can only be used for open surgery, and 10 only for MIS. One is a fluorescence system available for the Da Vinci robot. Nineteen devices can provide an overlay between fluorescence and white light image. All devices are compatible with Indocyanine Green, the most common fluorescence dye used intraoperatively. There is significant variability in the hardware and software of each device, which resulted in different sensitivity, fluorescence intensity, and image quality. All devices are CE-mark regulated, and 30 were FDA-approved.

Conclusion

There is a prolific market of devices for FGS and healthcare professionals should have basic knowledge of their technical specifications to use it at best for each clinical indication. Standardisation across devices must be a priority in the field of FGS, and it will enhance external validity for future clinical trials in the field.

Graphical abstract

Abstract Image

用于荧光引导手术(FGS)的最新医疗设备:技术回顾与未来发展
背景用于荧光引导手术(FGS)的医疗设备正在快速普及。外科医生面临的主要挑战在于缺乏对光学成像的深入了解、技术规格不一且标准化程度低,以及如何根据临床应用选择最佳设备。本手稿旨在通过比较市售荧光成像平台的使用模式、所需设置、图像类型、兼容荧光团、监管批准和成本,提供最新的描述。我们通过在 PubMed 上进行广泛的文献检索以及直接联系医疗公司获得了这些信息。本综述收集的数据截止到 2023 年 11 月。结果确定了 19 家医疗公司生产的 32 种设备。其中 10 台是手术显微镜,5 台可用于开放手术和微创手术 (MIS),6 台只能用于开放手术,10 台只能用于微创手术。有一种荧光系统可用于达芬奇机器人。19 台设备可以提供荧光和白光图像的叠加。所有设备都与吲哚菁绿兼容,吲哚菁绿是术中最常用的荧光染料。每种设备的硬件和软件都有很大差异,导致灵敏度、荧光强度和图像质量不同。所有设备均符合 CE 标志要求,其中 30 台设备获得了美国食品及药物管理局的批准。FGS领域必须优先考虑各种设备的标准化,这将提高该领域未来临床试验的外部有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信