B.W. Scheithauer, K. Kovacs, R.V. Randall, E. Horvath, E.R. Laws Jr
{"title":"10 Pathology of excessive production of growth hormone","authors":"B.W. Scheithauer, K. Kovacs, R.V. Randall, E. Horvath, E.R. Laws Jr","doi":"10.1016/S0300-595X(86)80014-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since its clinical description in the last century, much progress has been made in our understanding of acromegaly. From an initial description of pituitary enlargement as just another manifestation of generalized visceromegaly, the pituitary abnormality has come to be recognized, in most instances, as the underlying aetiological factor. Gigantism and acromegaly are manifestations of disordered pituitary physiology, but the lesion responsible may be hypothalamic, adenohypophyseal or ectopic in location.</p><p>The best known pathological hypothalamic basis for acromegaly is represented by a neuronal malformation or ‘gangliocytoma’. It usually takes the form of an intrasellar gangliocytoma or, more rarely, a hypothalamic hamartoma. The neuronal elaboration of GHRH may play a role in the development of a growth hormone adenoma; the pituitary process may pass through an intermediate stage of somatotropic hyperplasia.</p><p>When acromegaly has its basis in a pituitary abnormality, the lesion is almost exclusively an adenoma; the non-tumorous adenohypophysis shows no evidence of coexistent hyperplasia. Surprisingly, such tumours are more often engaged in the formation of multiple hormones rather than GH alone. They frequently produce not only GH and prolactin, the products characteristic of cells of the acidophil line, but also glycoprotein hormones, usually TSH. The spectrum of adenomas also varies in its degree of differentiation from a histogenetically primitive lesion, the acidophil stem cell adenoma, to well-differentiated tumours of varying cellular composition and hormone content. Each adenoma type has its clinicopathological, histochemical, immunocytological and ultrastructural characteristics.</p><p>The isolation and characterization of GHRH has permitted the identification of neuroendocrine tumours, most of foregut origin, elaborating this releasing hormone. Such functional tumours induce hyperplasia of pituitary somatotrophs and may, on occasion, result in the formation of growth hormone adenomas. Resection of these GHRH-producing neoplasms results in reversal of endocrinological and sellar abnormalities.</p><p>Future efforts should be directed toward the elucidation of the aetiology of pituitary adenomas, specifically whether they represent a proliferative a hypothalamic abnormality, or whether it has a ‘de novo’ origin in the ‘usual process of neoplastic transformation’.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10454,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Endocrinology and Metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0300-595X(86)80014-7","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Endocrinology and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300595X86800147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40
Abstract
Since its clinical description in the last century, much progress has been made in our understanding of acromegaly. From an initial description of pituitary enlargement as just another manifestation of generalized visceromegaly, the pituitary abnormality has come to be recognized, in most instances, as the underlying aetiological factor. Gigantism and acromegaly are manifestations of disordered pituitary physiology, but the lesion responsible may be hypothalamic, adenohypophyseal or ectopic in location.
The best known pathological hypothalamic basis for acromegaly is represented by a neuronal malformation or ‘gangliocytoma’. It usually takes the form of an intrasellar gangliocytoma or, more rarely, a hypothalamic hamartoma. The neuronal elaboration of GHRH may play a role in the development of a growth hormone adenoma; the pituitary process may pass through an intermediate stage of somatotropic hyperplasia.
When acromegaly has its basis in a pituitary abnormality, the lesion is almost exclusively an adenoma; the non-tumorous adenohypophysis shows no evidence of coexistent hyperplasia. Surprisingly, such tumours are more often engaged in the formation of multiple hormones rather than GH alone. They frequently produce not only GH and prolactin, the products characteristic of cells of the acidophil line, but also glycoprotein hormones, usually TSH. The spectrum of adenomas also varies in its degree of differentiation from a histogenetically primitive lesion, the acidophil stem cell adenoma, to well-differentiated tumours of varying cellular composition and hormone content. Each adenoma type has its clinicopathological, histochemical, immunocytological and ultrastructural characteristics.
The isolation and characterization of GHRH has permitted the identification of neuroendocrine tumours, most of foregut origin, elaborating this releasing hormone. Such functional tumours induce hyperplasia of pituitary somatotrophs and may, on occasion, result in the formation of growth hormone adenomas. Resection of these GHRH-producing neoplasms results in reversal of endocrinological and sellar abnormalities.
Future efforts should be directed toward the elucidation of the aetiology of pituitary adenomas, specifically whether they represent a proliferative a hypothalamic abnormality, or whether it has a ‘de novo’ origin in the ‘usual process of neoplastic transformation’.