Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach.

IF 2.6 3区医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

International Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428

Sofia Guerra-Paiva,Irene Carrillo,José Mira,Joana Fernandes,Reinhard Strametz,Eva Gil-Hernández,Paulo Sousa

{"title":"Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach.","authors":"Sofia Guerra-Paiva,Irene Carrillo,José Mira,Joana Fernandes,Reinhard Strametz,Eva Gil-Hernández,Paulo Sousa","doi":"10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives\r\nTo establish a consensus for evaluating second victims (SV) support interventions to facilitate comparison over time and across different organizations.\r\n\r\nMethods\r\nA three-phase qualitative study was conducted from June 2023 to March 2024. This consensus approach engaged members of the European Researchers Network Working on Second Victims. A nominal group technique and insights from a scoping review were used to create a questionnaire for Delphi Rounds. Indicators were rated 1-5, aiming for agreement if over 70% of participants rated an indicator as feasible and sensitive with scores above 4, followed by a consensus conference.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nFrom an initial set of 113 indicators, 59 were assessed online, with 35 advancing to the Delphi rounds. Two Delphi rounds were conducted, achieving response rates of over 60% and 80% respectively, resulting in consensus on 11 indicators for evaluating SV support programs. These indicators encompass awareness and activation, outcomes of SV support programs, as well as training offered by the institution.\r\n\r\nConclusion\r\nThis study presents a scoreboard for designing and monitoring SV support programs, as well as measuring standardized outcomes in future research.","PeriodicalId":14322,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives To establish a consensus for evaluating second victims (SV) support interventions to facilitate comparison over time and across different organizations. Methods A three-phase qualitative study was conducted from June 2023 to March 2024. This consensus approach engaged members of the European Researchers Network Working on Second Victims. A nominal group technique and insights from a scoping review were used to create a questionnaire for Delphi Rounds. Indicators were rated 1-5, aiming for agreement if over 70% of participants rated an indicator as feasible and sensitive with scores above 4, followed by a consensus conference. Results From an initial set of 113 indicators, 59 were assessed online, with 35 advancing to the Delphi rounds. Two Delphi rounds were conducted, achieving response rates of over 60% and 80% respectively, resulting in consensus on 11 indicators for evaluating SV support programs. These indicators encompass awareness and activation, outcomes of SV support programs, as well as training offered by the institution. Conclusion This study presents a scoreboard for designing and monitoring SV support programs, as well as measuring standardized outcomes in future research.

查看原文本刊更多论文

制定评估第二受害者计划的核心指标：国际共识方法》。

方法从 2023 年 6 月至 2024 年 3 月开展了一项分三个阶段的定性研究。这一共识方法吸引了欧洲第二受害者研究网络成员的参与。利用名义小组技术和范围界定审查的见解，为德尔菲回合编制了一份调查问卷。对指标进行 1-5 级评分，如果超过 70% 的参与者认为某项指标可行且敏感度高于 4 分，则达成一致意见，然后召开共识会议。结果在最初的 113 项指标中，有 59 项接受了在线评估，其中 35 项进入德尔菲轮。两轮德尔菲评估的回复率分别超过了 60% 和 80%，最终就 11 项 SV 支持项目评估指标达成了共识。这些指标包括认识和激活、SV 支持项目的成果以及机构提供的培训。结论本研究为设计和监测 SV 支持项目以及在未来研究中衡量标准化成果提供了一个记分牌。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

2.20%

发文量

269

审稿时长

12 months

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Public Health publishes scientific articles relevant to global public health, from different countries and cultures, and assembles them into issues that raise awareness and understanding of public health problems and solutions. The Journal welcomes submissions of original research, critical and relevant reviews, methodological papers and manuscripts that emphasize theoretical content. IJPH sometimes publishes commentaries and opinions. Special issues highlight key areas of current research. The Editorial Board''s mission is to provide a thoughtful forum for contemporary issues and challenges in global public health research and practice.