Deep PSA response and extended time‐to‐nadir as robust predictors of survival in Asian patients with de novo metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer receiving upfront intensified treatment

The Prostate Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1002/pros.24797
Chris H.‐M. Wong, Ivan C.‐H. Ko, David K.‐W. Leung, Brian Siu, Cheuk‐K. K. Cheng, Yung‐Y. J. Lim, Hiu T. Mok, Chun‐F. B. Kwok, Cheuk Y. Tang, Steven C.‐H. Leung, Peter K.‐F. Chiu, Jeremy Y.‐C. Teoh, Chi F. Ng
{"title":"Deep PSA response and extended time‐to‐nadir as robust predictors of survival in Asian patients with de novo metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer receiving upfront intensified treatment","authors":"Chris H.‐M. Wong, Ivan C.‐H. Ko, David K.‐W. Leung, Brian Siu, Cheuk‐K. K. Cheng, Yung‐Y. J. Lim, Hiu T. Mok, Chun‐F. B. Kwok, Cheuk Y. Tang, Steven C.‐H. Leung, Peter K.‐F. Chiu, Jeremy Y.‐C. Teoh, Chi F. Ng","doi":"10.1002/pros.24797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionIn de novo metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) treated with upfront intensification using androgen receptor signaling inhibitor or chemotherapy (Docetaxel), achieving a PSA nadir less than 0.2 ng/mL, indicative of superior survival in trials, may often be unattainable in real‐world settings. We explored the predictive value of the degree of PSA decline and time to PSA nadir (TTPN) on oncological outcomes.MethodsA prospectively maintained database of consecutive prostate cancer cases in Hong Kong was accessed. Patients diagnosed with de novo mHSPC from 2016 to 2022 and treated with upfront intensification were included in this analysis. Landmark analysis on PSA kinetics at 6‐months following treatment intensification was performed. They were classified based on 1) TTPN (≥6 months vs. &lt;6 months), and 2) a combined response (deep responders achieving both ≥95% PSA decline and TTPN ≥ 6 months vs. shallow responders). Multivariable regression analysis was employed to identify the effects of confounders.FindingsA total of 131 patients were included in this analysis. Classifying patients by combined response best predicted survival outcomes. Deep responders had better progression‐free survival (HR = 0.56; 95%CI = 0.34–0.91; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.019), overall survival (HR = 0.50; 95%CI = 0.26–0.97; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.036), and cancer‐specific survival (HR = 0.43; 95%CI = 0.19–0.99; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.042). Difference in overall survival remained significant after adjustment in multivariable regression analysis.ConclusionOur analysis demonstrates that alternative PSA targets can predict treatment response and survival outcomes in de novo mHSPC patients in a real‐world setting, providing valuable information for patient counselling and potentially guiding future trial design.","PeriodicalId":501684,"journal":{"name":"The Prostate","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionIn de novo metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) treated with upfront intensification using androgen receptor signaling inhibitor or chemotherapy (Docetaxel), achieving a PSA nadir less than 0.2 ng/mL, indicative of superior survival in trials, may often be unattainable in real‐world settings. We explored the predictive value of the degree of PSA decline and time to PSA nadir (TTPN) on oncological outcomes.MethodsA prospectively maintained database of consecutive prostate cancer cases in Hong Kong was accessed. Patients diagnosed with de novo mHSPC from 2016 to 2022 and treated with upfront intensification were included in this analysis. Landmark analysis on PSA kinetics at 6‐months following treatment intensification was performed. They were classified based on 1) TTPN (≥6 months vs. <6 months), and 2) a combined response (deep responders achieving both ≥95% PSA decline and TTPN ≥ 6 months vs. shallow responders). Multivariable regression analysis was employed to identify the effects of confounders.FindingsA total of 131 patients were included in this analysis. Classifying patients by combined response best predicted survival outcomes. Deep responders had better progression‐free survival (HR = 0.56; 95%CI = 0.34–0.91; p = 0.019), overall survival (HR = 0.50; 95%CI = 0.26–0.97; p = 0.036), and cancer‐specific survival (HR = 0.43; 95%CI = 0.19–0.99; p = 0.042). Difference in overall survival remained significant after adjustment in multivariable regression analysis.ConclusionOur analysis demonstrates that alternative PSA targets can predict treatment response and survival outcomes in de novo mHSPC patients in a real‐world setting, providing valuable information for patient counselling and potentially guiding future trial design.
对接受前期强化治疗的亚洲新发转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌患者而言,深度 PSA 反应和延长的达标时间是预测其生存率的可靠指标
导言:在使用雄激素受体信号抑制剂或化疗(多西他赛)进行前期强化治疗的新发转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)中,PSA nadir值小于0.2 ng/mL是试验中生存率较高的指标,但在实际环境中往往无法实现。我们探讨了 PSA 下降程度和 PSA 低谷时间(TTPN)对肿瘤预后的预测价值。分析纳入了2016年至2022年期间诊断为新发mHSPC并接受前期强化治疗的患者。对强化治疗后6个月的PSA动力学进行了标志性分析。他们的分类依据是:1)TTPN(≥6个月 vs. <6个月);2)综合反应(PSA下降≥95%且TTPN≥6个月的深度反应者 vs. 浅度反应者)。分析中采用了多变量回归分析来确定混杂因素的影响。根据综合反应对患者进行分类最能预测生存结果。深度反应者的无进展生存期(HR = 0.56;95%CI = 0.34-0.91;P = 0.019)、总生存期(HR = 0.50;95%CI = 0.26-0.97;P = 0.036)和癌症特异性生存期(HR = 0.43;95%CI = 0.19-0.99;P = 0.042)都更好。结论我们的分析表明,在真实世界环境中,替代 PSA 靶点可以预测新发 mHSPC 患者的治疗反应和生存结果,为患者咨询提供有价值的信息,并有可能指导未来的试验设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信