Scientific and technological knowledge grows linearly over time

Huquan Kang, Luoyi Fu, Russell J. Funk, Xinbing Wang, Jiaxin Ding, Shiyu Liang, Jianghao Wang, Lei Zhou, Chenghu Zhou
{"title":"Scientific and technological knowledge grows linearly over time","authors":"Huquan Kang, Luoyi Fu, Russell J. Funk, Xinbing Wang, Jiaxin Ding, Shiyu Liang, Jianghao Wang, Lei Zhou, Chenghu Zhou","doi":"arxiv-2409.08349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The past few centuries have witnessed a dramatic growth in scientific and\ntechnological knowledge. However, the nature of that growth - whether\nexponential or otherwise - remains controversial, perhaps partly due to the\nlack of quantitative characterizations. We evaluated knowledge as a collective\nthinking structure, using citation networks as a representation, by examining\nextensive datasets that include 213 million publications (1800-2020) and 7.6\nmillion patents (1976-2020). We found that knowledge - which we conceptualize\nas the reduction of uncertainty in a knowledge network - grew linearly over\ntime in naturally formed citation networks that themselves expanded\nexponentially. Moreover, our results revealed inflection points in the growth\nof knowledge that often corresponded to important developments within fields,\nsuch as major breakthroughs, new paradigms, or the emergence of entirely new\nareas of study. Around these inflection points, knowledge may grow rapidly or\nexponentially on a local scale, although the overall growth rate remains linear\nwhen viewed globally. Previous studies concluding an exponential growth of\nknowledge may have focused primarily on these local bursts of rapid growth\naround key developments, leading to the misconception of a global exponential\ntrend. Our findings help to reconcile the discrepancy between the perceived\nexponential growth and the actual linear growth of knowledge by highlighting\nthe distinction between local and global growth patterns. Overall, our findings\nreveal major science development trends for policymaking, showing that\nproducing knowledge is far more challenging than producing papers.","PeriodicalId":501082,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - Information Theory","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - Information Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The past few centuries have witnessed a dramatic growth in scientific and technological knowledge. However, the nature of that growth - whether exponential or otherwise - remains controversial, perhaps partly due to the lack of quantitative characterizations. We evaluated knowledge as a collective thinking structure, using citation networks as a representation, by examining extensive datasets that include 213 million publications (1800-2020) and 7.6 million patents (1976-2020). We found that knowledge - which we conceptualize as the reduction of uncertainty in a knowledge network - grew linearly over time in naturally formed citation networks that themselves expanded exponentially. Moreover, our results revealed inflection points in the growth of knowledge that often corresponded to important developments within fields, such as major breakthroughs, new paradigms, or the emergence of entirely new areas of study. Around these inflection points, knowledge may grow rapidly or exponentially on a local scale, although the overall growth rate remains linear when viewed globally. Previous studies concluding an exponential growth of knowledge may have focused primarily on these local bursts of rapid growth around key developments, leading to the misconception of a global exponential trend. Our findings help to reconcile the discrepancy between the perceived exponential growth and the actual linear growth of knowledge by highlighting the distinction between local and global growth patterns. Overall, our findings reveal major science development trends for policymaking, showing that producing knowledge is far more challenging than producing papers.
科技知识随时间线性增长
在过去的几个世纪里,科学和技术知识急剧增长。然而,这种增长的性质--是指数增长还是其他--仍然存在争议,部分原因可能是缺乏定量描述。我们以引文网络为代表,通过研究包括 2.13 亿篇出版物(1800-2020 年)和 760 万项专利(1976-2020 年)在内的大量数据集,将知识作为一种集体思维结构进行了评估。我们发现,在自然形成的引文网络中,知识--我们将其概念化为知识网络中不确定性的减少--随着时间的推移呈线性增长,而引文网络本身也呈指数增长。此外,我们的结果还揭示了知识增长的拐点,这些拐点往往与领域内的重要发展相对应,如重大突破、新范式或全新研究领域的出现。在这些拐点附近,知识可能会在局部范围内迅速增长或呈指数增长,尽管从全球范围来看,总体增长率仍然是线性的。以前得出知识指数增长结论的研究可能主要集中在这些围绕关键发展的局部快速增长上,从而导致了对全球指数趋势的误解。我们的研究结果通过强调地方和全球增长模式之间的区别,有助于调和人们所认为的指数增长与知识的实际线性增长之间的差异。总之,我们的研究结果为决策揭示了科学发展的主要趋势,表明生产知识远比生产论文更具挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信