Huquan Kang, Luoyi Fu, Russell J. Funk, Xinbing Wang, Jiaxin Ding, Shiyu Liang, Jianghao Wang, Lei Zhou, Chenghu Zhou
{"title":"Scientific and technological knowledge grows linearly over time","authors":"Huquan Kang, Luoyi Fu, Russell J. Funk, Xinbing Wang, Jiaxin Ding, Shiyu Liang, Jianghao Wang, Lei Zhou, Chenghu Zhou","doi":"arxiv-2409.08349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The past few centuries have witnessed a dramatic growth in scientific and\ntechnological knowledge. However, the nature of that growth - whether\nexponential or otherwise - remains controversial, perhaps partly due to the\nlack of quantitative characterizations. We evaluated knowledge as a collective\nthinking structure, using citation networks as a representation, by examining\nextensive datasets that include 213 million publications (1800-2020) and 7.6\nmillion patents (1976-2020). We found that knowledge - which we conceptualize\nas the reduction of uncertainty in a knowledge network - grew linearly over\ntime in naturally formed citation networks that themselves expanded\nexponentially. Moreover, our results revealed inflection points in the growth\nof knowledge that often corresponded to important developments within fields,\nsuch as major breakthroughs, new paradigms, or the emergence of entirely new\nareas of study. Around these inflection points, knowledge may grow rapidly or\nexponentially on a local scale, although the overall growth rate remains linear\nwhen viewed globally. Previous studies concluding an exponential growth of\nknowledge may have focused primarily on these local bursts of rapid growth\naround key developments, leading to the misconception of a global exponential\ntrend. Our findings help to reconcile the discrepancy between the perceived\nexponential growth and the actual linear growth of knowledge by highlighting\nthe distinction between local and global growth patterns. Overall, our findings\nreveal major science development trends for policymaking, showing that\nproducing knowledge is far more challenging than producing papers.","PeriodicalId":501082,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - Information Theory","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - Information Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The past few centuries have witnessed a dramatic growth in scientific and
technological knowledge. However, the nature of that growth - whether
exponential or otherwise - remains controversial, perhaps partly due to the
lack of quantitative characterizations. We evaluated knowledge as a collective
thinking structure, using citation networks as a representation, by examining
extensive datasets that include 213 million publications (1800-2020) and 7.6
million patents (1976-2020). We found that knowledge - which we conceptualize
as the reduction of uncertainty in a knowledge network - grew linearly over
time in naturally formed citation networks that themselves expanded
exponentially. Moreover, our results revealed inflection points in the growth
of knowledge that often corresponded to important developments within fields,
such as major breakthroughs, new paradigms, or the emergence of entirely new
areas of study. Around these inflection points, knowledge may grow rapidly or
exponentially on a local scale, although the overall growth rate remains linear
when viewed globally. Previous studies concluding an exponential growth of
knowledge may have focused primarily on these local bursts of rapid growth
around key developments, leading to the misconception of a global exponential
trend. Our findings help to reconcile the discrepancy between the perceived
exponential growth and the actual linear growth of knowledge by highlighting
the distinction between local and global growth patterns. Overall, our findings
reveal major science development trends for policymaking, showing that
producing knowledge is far more challenging than producing papers.