Clinical characteristics, in-hospital management, and outcomes among patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke in rural vs. urban hospitals in China: a nationwide hospital-based study
{"title":"Clinical characteristics, in-hospital management, and outcomes among patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke in rural vs. urban hospitals in China: a nationwide hospital-based study","authors":"Zhikai Zhu, Yingyu Jiang, Xin Yang, Chunjuan Wang, Yingxi Chen, Zixiao Li, Yongjun Wang, Yong Jiang, Hong-Qiu Gu","doi":"10.1177/17474930241286709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundEfforts to improve rural stroke care have intensified in China. However, high-quality comprehensive data on the differences in care and outcomes between urban and rural hospitals are limited.MethodsWe analyzed data on patients with acute ischemic stroke hospitalized in the China Stroke Center Alliance hospitals from 2015 to 2022. The in-hospital management measures assessed included nine acute and five discharge management measures. Outcomes evaluated included death or discharge against medical advice (DAMA), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), disability at discharge, and in-hospital complications.ResultsWe enrolled 1,583,271 patients with acute ischemic stroke from 1,930 hospitals, comprising 1 086 (56.3%) rural sites with 735 452 patients and 844 (43.7%) urban sites with 847 891 patients. Patients in rural hospitals demonstrate suboptimal management measures compared to those in urban hospitals, including lower rates of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 4.5 h (26.0% vs. 28.3%; difference, -2.3% [-2.5% to -2.0%]), endovascular treatment (0.6% vs. 1.9%; difference, -1.3% [-1.3% to -1.2%]), vessel assessment (88.5% vs. 92.0%; difference, -3.5% [95% CI, -3.6% to -3.4%]), and anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation at discharge (42.9% vs. 47.7%; difference, -4.8% [95% CI, -5.4% to -4.2%]). Overall, the rural-urban disparity in in-hospital outcomes was small. Rural patients had a slightly higher rate of in-hospital death/DAMA (9.0% vs. 8.0%; aOR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.20–1.23]; aRD, 1.3% [95% CI, 1.2%–1.4%]) and a slightly lower rate of complications (10.9% vs. 13.0%; aOR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.82–0.84]; aRD, -1.3% [95% CI, -1.3%–1.3%]). No notable rural-urban differences were observed in MACE and disability at discharge.ConclusionsPatients in rural hospitals demonstrated suboptimal management measures and had higher rates of in-hospital death/DAMA compared to those in urban hospitals. Prioritizing the allocation of health resources to rural hospitals is essential to improve healthcare quality and outcomes.Data access statementThe data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241286709","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundEfforts to improve rural stroke care have intensified in China. However, high-quality comprehensive data on the differences in care and outcomes between urban and rural hospitals are limited.MethodsWe analyzed data on patients with acute ischemic stroke hospitalized in the China Stroke Center Alliance hospitals from 2015 to 2022. The in-hospital management measures assessed included nine acute and five discharge management measures. Outcomes evaluated included death or discharge against medical advice (DAMA), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), disability at discharge, and in-hospital complications.ResultsWe enrolled 1,583,271 patients with acute ischemic stroke from 1,930 hospitals, comprising 1 086 (56.3%) rural sites with 735 452 patients and 844 (43.7%) urban sites with 847 891 patients. Patients in rural hospitals demonstrate suboptimal management measures compared to those in urban hospitals, including lower rates of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 4.5 h (26.0% vs. 28.3%; difference, -2.3% [-2.5% to -2.0%]), endovascular treatment (0.6% vs. 1.9%; difference, -1.3% [-1.3% to -1.2%]), vessel assessment (88.5% vs. 92.0%; difference, -3.5% [95% CI, -3.6% to -3.4%]), and anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation at discharge (42.9% vs. 47.7%; difference, -4.8% [95% CI, -5.4% to -4.2%]). Overall, the rural-urban disparity in in-hospital outcomes was small. Rural patients had a slightly higher rate of in-hospital death/DAMA (9.0% vs. 8.0%; aOR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.20–1.23]; aRD, 1.3% [95% CI, 1.2%–1.4%]) and a slightly lower rate of complications (10.9% vs. 13.0%; aOR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.82–0.84]; aRD, -1.3% [95% CI, -1.3%–1.3%]). No notable rural-urban differences were observed in MACE and disability at discharge.ConclusionsPatients in rural hospitals demonstrated suboptimal management measures and had higher rates of in-hospital death/DAMA compared to those in urban hospitals. Prioritizing the allocation of health resources to rural hospitals is essential to improve healthcare quality and outcomes.Data access statementThe data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.