Identification and Treatment of Lung Cancer Oncogenic Drivers in a Diverse Safety Net Setting

Abstract

Advances in the testing and treatment of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring oncogenic drivers have improved outcomes. Little is known about testing and treatment patterns in the diverse patient populations. We conducted a retrospective study in a diverse cohort of patients treated in the John Peter Smith safety net healthcare system. We determined patterns of blood- and tissue-based testing and treatment of patients with and alterations. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to assess the impact of and testing. A total of 220 patients were included, 97 (44%) were non-Hispanic White, 72 (33%) were Black, 28 (13%) were Hispanic, and 23(10%) were Asian. and testing increased over time from 55% and 52%, respectively, in 2017 to 87% and 82%, respectively, in 2021. Frequency of alterations were highest in Asian patients (45%) and comparable among other groups (6-13%). Frequency of alterations were highest in Hispanic (13%), and Asian (11%) patients, and were 2% for both Black and non-Hispanic White patients. In a multivariate model, lack of testing was associated with worse survival (aHR 1.6; = .003) and testing positive for (aHR 0.43; = .01) or (aHR 0.28; = .04) was associated with improved survival. Race and ethnicity were not associated with survival differences. As molecular testing for oncogenic mutations in NSCLC increases, druggable alterations such as and can be identified in all race-ethnicity groups and are associated with improved outcomes.