Contraceptive Outcomes of the Natural Cycles Birth Control App: A Study of Canadian Women

Eleonora Benhar, Agathe van Lamsweerde, Elina Berglund Scherwitzl, Kerry Krauss, Raoul Scherwitzl
{"title":"Contraceptive Outcomes of the Natural Cycles Birth Control App: A Study of Canadian Women","authors":"Eleonora Benhar, Agathe van Lamsweerde, Elina Berglund Scherwitzl, Kerry Krauss, Raoul Scherwitzl","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.13.24313618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective This study aimed to investigate the key demographics and evaluate the real-world contraceptive failure and continuation rates of the Natural Cycles app in a cohort of women from Canada. Methods This was a real-world, prospective cohort study. Demographics were assessed via in-app questionnaires. Contraceptive failure rates in typical and perfect use were calculated using the 13-cycle cumulative pregnancy probability (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis) and the one-year Pearl Index (PI). One-year continuation rates were estimated through survival analysis. Results\nThe study included 8 '798 women who contributed an average of 9.2 months of data, amounting to a total of 7' 063 woman-years of exposure. The average user was 27.3 years old, had a body mass index of 24.6, and reported being in a stable relationship. With typical use, the app demonstrated a 13-cycle cumulative pregnancy probability of 4.8 [95% CI: 4.3, 5.4] and a Pearl Index of 4.3 [95% CI: 3.9, 4.8]. Under perfect use, the contraceptive failure rate was 2.3 [95% CI: 0.7, 3.9] for life table analysis and 1.7 [95% CI: 0.5, 2.8] for the 1-year PI. The contraceptive method's continuation rate after one year was 62.4%. Conclusions\nThe data presented in this study offer valuable insights into the cohort of women using the Natural Cycles app in Canada and provide country-specific effectiveness estimates. The app's contraceptive effectiveness aligns with previously published data on Natural Cycles.","PeriodicalId":501409,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.13.24313618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to investigate the key demographics and evaluate the real-world contraceptive failure and continuation rates of the Natural Cycles app in a cohort of women from Canada. Methods This was a real-world, prospective cohort study. Demographics were assessed via in-app questionnaires. Contraceptive failure rates in typical and perfect use were calculated using the 13-cycle cumulative pregnancy probability (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis) and the one-year Pearl Index (PI). One-year continuation rates were estimated through survival analysis. Results The study included 8 '798 women who contributed an average of 9.2 months of data, amounting to a total of 7' 063 woman-years of exposure. The average user was 27.3 years old, had a body mass index of 24.6, and reported being in a stable relationship. With typical use, the app demonstrated a 13-cycle cumulative pregnancy probability of 4.8 [95% CI: 4.3, 5.4] and a Pearl Index of 4.3 [95% CI: 3.9, 4.8]. Under perfect use, the contraceptive failure rate was 2.3 [95% CI: 0.7, 3.9] for life table analysis and 1.7 [95% CI: 0.5, 2.8] for the 1-year PI. The contraceptive method's continuation rate after one year was 62.4%. Conclusions The data presented in this study offer valuable insights into the cohort of women using the Natural Cycles app in Canada and provide country-specific effectiveness estimates. The app's contraceptive effectiveness aligns with previously published data on Natural Cycles.
自然周期节育应用程序的避孕效果:加拿大妇女研究
目的 本研究旨在调查加拿大女性群体的主要人口统计学特征,并评估 "自然周期 "应用程序在真实世界中的避孕失败率和持续率。方法 这是一项真实世界的前瞻性队列研究。通过应用程序内的问卷对人口统计学进行评估。使用 13 个周期的累积怀孕概率(卡普兰-梅耶尔生存分析法)和一年期珍珠指数 (PI) 计算典型和完美使用情况下的避孕失败率。通过生存分析法估算了一年的持续率。结果这项研究包括 8 798 名妇女,她们平均提供了 9.2 个月的数据,共计 7 063 个妇女年。用户平均年龄为 27.3 岁,体重指数为 24.6,并称自己有稳定的恋爱关系。在典型使用情况下,该应用程序 13 个周期的累积怀孕概率为 4.8 [95% CI:4.3, 5.4],珍珠指数为 4.3 [95% CI:3.9, 4.8]。在完全使用的情况下,生命表分析的避孕失败率为 2.3 [95% CI:0.7,3.9],1 年 PI 为 1.7 [95% CI:0.5,2.8]。避孕方法一年后的持续率为 62.4%。结论本研究提供的数据为了解加拿大使用 "自然周期 "应用程序的妇女群体提供了宝贵的信息,并提供了针对具体国家的有效性估计。该应用程序的避孕效果与之前公布的 "自然周期 "数据一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信