Association of air pollution from a landfill site with primary care consultation

Kelvin Jordan, Sara Muller, Muhammad Usman, James Bailey, Claire Burton, Sarah Lawton, Christian Mallen, Kayleigh Mason, Simon Wathall, Danielle van der Windt
{"title":"Association of air pollution from a landfill site with primary care consultation","authors":"Kelvin Jordan, Sara Muller, Muhammad Usman, James Bailey, Claire Burton, Sarah Lawton, Christian Mallen, Kayleigh Mason, Simon Wathall, Danielle van der Windt","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.16.24313470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nWaste landfill sites are associated with gaseous emissions and this air pollution can cause unpleasant smells (malodour). This causes concerns about its impact on the health of the local population. This study assessed change in general practice consultation behaviour during a period of increased complaints associated with air pollution at a landfill site in the UK.\nMethods The study period was October 2020 to December 2021. The age-sex standardised prevalence and incidence of consultations for mental health, respiratory, and other symptoms hypothesised to be impacted by the air pollution issues were determined and compared between: i) 6 practices located close to the landfill site (zone A), ii) 6 practices located a mid-distance from the site (zone B), iii) 6 practices located further away and expected to have had less impact (zone C). Results\nWhilst there was an increased consultation for mental health problems in practices nearest to the landfill site compared to those furthest away, consultation frequencies for respiratory and other potentially associated symptoms were lower and likelihood of consultation was consistently highest in practices located in zone B. Conclusion\nThis study did not show an increase in recorded primary healthcare contacts for conditions and symptoms hypothesised to be connected to air pollution. It highlighted the challenges of examining the impact of air pollution on the health of local populations. Since this study focussed on coded consultations in primary care and not symptoms present in the general population, an impact on the health of individuals cannot be ruled out.","PeriodicalId":501276,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.16.24313470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Waste landfill sites are associated with gaseous emissions and this air pollution can cause unpleasant smells (malodour). This causes concerns about its impact on the health of the local population. This study assessed change in general practice consultation behaviour during a period of increased complaints associated with air pollution at a landfill site in the UK. Methods The study period was October 2020 to December 2021. The age-sex standardised prevalence and incidence of consultations for mental health, respiratory, and other symptoms hypothesised to be impacted by the air pollution issues were determined and compared between: i) 6 practices located close to the landfill site (zone A), ii) 6 practices located a mid-distance from the site (zone B), iii) 6 practices located further away and expected to have had less impact (zone C). Results Whilst there was an increased consultation for mental health problems in practices nearest to the landfill site compared to those furthest away, consultation frequencies for respiratory and other potentially associated symptoms were lower and likelihood of consultation was consistently highest in practices located in zone B. Conclusion This study did not show an increase in recorded primary healthcare contacts for conditions and symptoms hypothesised to be connected to air pollution. It highlighted the challenges of examining the impact of air pollution on the health of local populations. Since this study focussed on coded consultations in primary care and not symptoms present in the general population, an impact on the health of individuals cannot be ruled out.
垃圾填埋场空气污染与初级保健咨询的关系
背景垃圾填埋场会排放气体,这种空气污染会产生难闻的气味(恶臭)。这引起了人们对其对当地居民健康影响的担忧。本研究评估了在与英国垃圾填埋场空气污染有关的投诉增加期间全科医生咨询行为的变化。研究确定了受空气污染问题影响的心理健康、呼吸系统和其他症状的年龄-性别标准化就诊率和发生率,并在以下几个方面进行了比较:i) 位于垃圾填埋场附近的 6 家诊所(A 区);ii) 位于垃圾填埋场中段的 6 家诊所(B 区);iii) 位于垃圾填埋场较远、预计影响较小的 6 家诊所(C 区)。结果与距离垃圾填埋场最远的医疗机构相比,距离垃圾填埋场最近的医疗机构中因精神健康问题就诊的人数有所增加,但因呼吸系统和其他潜在相关症状就诊的人数较少,而且位于 B 区的医疗机构就诊的可能性一直最高。它凸显了研究空气污染对当地居民健康的影响所面临的挑战。由于本研究的重点是初级医疗保健中的编码咨询,而不是普通人群中出现的症状,因此不能排除对个人健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信