A single trunk-mounted wearable sensor to measure motor performance in triathletes during competition

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Stuart M Chesher, Simon M Rosalie, Dale W Chapman, Paula C Charlton, Fleur ECA van Rens, Kevin J Netto
{"title":"A single trunk-mounted wearable sensor to measure motor performance in triathletes during competition","authors":"Stuart M Chesher, Simon M Rosalie, Dale W Chapman, Paula C Charlton, Fleur ECA van Rens, Kevin J Netto","doi":"10.1177/17543371241272789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research was to validate a single, trunk-mounted wearable sensor (Optimeye S5, Catapult Australia, Melbourne) to measure the cadence of swimming strokes, cycling pedals and running strides in a triathlon. While similar validations have been performed in swimming and running, it is a novel application in cycling, and thus, across a whole triathlon. Seven triathletes were recruited to participate in a sprint distance triathlon which was filmed and simultaneously measured by a single, trunk-mounted wearable sensor. To validate the wearable sensor, individual swimming strokes, cycling pedal strokes and running strides were manually counted by viewing the wearable sensor data and video footage. While analysing cycling data, changes in cycling subtask performances were noticed, thus, a secondary analysis in cycling was conducted to investigate. The 95% limits of agreement analysis indicated the sensor validly measured swimming strokes (mean bias = −0.034 strokes), cycling pedal strokes (mean bias = −0.09 strokes) and running strides (mean bias = 0.00 strides) with minimal to no bias ( p > 0.05). Further analysis of cycling revealed the wearable sensor is an acceptably valid tool to measure the duration of out of saddle riding (mean bias = 0.08 s), however, significant differences in the duration of in saddle riding (mean bias = −0.5 s) and coasting were identified (mean bias = 0.39 s). A single trunk mounted wearable sensor is a valid tool to measure movement cadence in a triathlon, however, further validation is required to generate a full understanding of cycling subtask performances.","PeriodicalId":20674,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371241272789","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this research was to validate a single, trunk-mounted wearable sensor (Optimeye S5, Catapult Australia, Melbourne) to measure the cadence of swimming strokes, cycling pedals and running strides in a triathlon. While similar validations have been performed in swimming and running, it is a novel application in cycling, and thus, across a whole triathlon. Seven triathletes were recruited to participate in a sprint distance triathlon which was filmed and simultaneously measured by a single, trunk-mounted wearable sensor. To validate the wearable sensor, individual swimming strokes, cycling pedal strokes and running strides were manually counted by viewing the wearable sensor data and video footage. While analysing cycling data, changes in cycling subtask performances were noticed, thus, a secondary analysis in cycling was conducted to investigate. The 95% limits of agreement analysis indicated the sensor validly measured swimming strokes (mean bias = −0.034 strokes), cycling pedal strokes (mean bias = −0.09 strokes) and running strides (mean bias = 0.00 strides) with minimal to no bias ( p > 0.05). Further analysis of cycling revealed the wearable sensor is an acceptably valid tool to measure the duration of out of saddle riding (mean bias = 0.08 s), however, significant differences in the duration of in saddle riding (mean bias = −0.5 s) and coasting were identified (mean bias = 0.39 s). A single trunk mounted wearable sensor is a valid tool to measure movement cadence in a triathlon, however, further validation is required to generate a full understanding of cycling subtask performances.
单个安装在躯干上的可穿戴传感器用于测量铁人三项运动员在比赛中的运动表现
本研究的目的是验证安装在躯干上的单一可穿戴传感器(Optimeye S5,澳大利亚 Catapult 公司,墨尔本)在铁人三项赛中测量游泳、自行车踏板和跑步步频的有效性。虽然类似的验证已在游泳和跑步中进行过,但这是在自行车运动中的新应用,因此也是在整个铁人三项运动中的新应用。我们招募了七名铁人三项运动员参加短距离铁人三项比赛,并对比赛进行拍摄,同时由一个安装在躯干上的可穿戴传感器进行测量。为了验证可穿戴传感器的有效性,通过查看可穿戴传感器数据和视频录像,对每个游泳动作、自行车踏板动作和跑步步幅进行了人工计数。在分析骑车数据时,发现骑车子任务的表现有所变化,因此对骑车进行了二次分析研究。95% 的一致性分析表明,传感器有效测量了游泳划水(平均偏差 = -0.034划)、自行车踏板划水(平均偏差 = -0.09划)和跑步步幅(平均偏差 = 0.00步),偏差极小甚至没有(p > 0.05)。对骑行的进一步分析表明,可穿戴传感器是测量鞍外骑行持续时间(平均偏差 = 0.08 秒)的有效工具,但在鞍内骑行(平均偏差 = -0.5 秒)和滑行(平均偏差 = 0.39 秒)的持续时间上存在显著差异。单个安装在躯干上的可穿戴传感器是测量铁人三项运动中运动步频的有效工具,然而,要全面了解自行车子任务的表现,还需要进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology covers the development of novel sports apparel, footwear, and equipment; and the materials, instrumentation, and processes that make advances in sports possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信