Wilnaye A Bain, Sabriquet Pinder-Butler, Terrance Fountain, Ilsa Grant
{"title":"Primary Care Physicians' Practices and Barriers in Evaluating and Managing Chronic Kidney Disease in New Providence, The Bahamas","authors":"Wilnaye A Bain, Sabriquet Pinder-Butler, Terrance Fountain, Ilsa Grant","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.13.24313661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To assess the practices and barriers in evaluating and managing chronic kidney disease among primary care physicians in New Providence, The Bahamas. Methods: A cross-sectional study utilizing an anonymous, self administered questionnaire was given to General Practitioners, Family Medicine, and Internal Medicine physicians after using a simple random sampling approach. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS software. Results: There were 119 physicians in this study with Family Medicine specialty area representing 52.1%. Seventy-four (74) physicians reported following CKD guidelines. The most common at-risk groups identified were Diabetes Mellitus (100%), Hypertension (98.3%), and use of nephrotoxic agents (97.5%). The most common diagnostic test used to identify CKD was eGFR (97.5%) and 72.2% of physicians used eGFR alone to stage CKD. Physicians overall agreed (40.3 - 50.4%) they were comfortable in diagnosing and managing CKD and its complications except for bone disorders (43.2%) and metabolic acidosis (34.7%) where responses were neutral. Physicians were neutral in having tools/resources to help them manage bone disorders (35.3%) and metabolic acidosis (31.9%) and disagreed to having educational tools for patients to understand bone disorders (32.2%) and metabolic acidosis (32.8%). Physicians agreed-strongly agreed with 12 of 13 perceived barriers, and there were 26 unique barriers expressed (8 patient-level, 7 provider-level, 11 systems-level).\nConclusions: Deficits in the evaluation and management of CKD, and numerous barriers to CKD care were discovered. Recommendations include the development of a national CKD guideline, local CKD continuous medical education seminars, and public health campaigns on CKD education.","PeriodicalId":501023,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Primary Care Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Primary Care Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.13.24313661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the practices and barriers in evaluating and managing chronic kidney disease among primary care physicians in New Providence, The Bahamas. Methods: A cross-sectional study utilizing an anonymous, self administered questionnaire was given to General Practitioners, Family Medicine, and Internal Medicine physicians after using a simple random sampling approach. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS software. Results: There were 119 physicians in this study with Family Medicine specialty area representing 52.1%. Seventy-four (74) physicians reported following CKD guidelines. The most common at-risk groups identified were Diabetes Mellitus (100%), Hypertension (98.3%), and use of nephrotoxic agents (97.5%). The most common diagnostic test used to identify CKD was eGFR (97.5%) and 72.2% of physicians used eGFR alone to stage CKD. Physicians overall agreed (40.3 - 50.4%) they were comfortable in diagnosing and managing CKD and its complications except for bone disorders (43.2%) and metabolic acidosis (34.7%) where responses were neutral. Physicians were neutral in having tools/resources to help them manage bone disorders (35.3%) and metabolic acidosis (31.9%) and disagreed to having educational tools for patients to understand bone disorders (32.2%) and metabolic acidosis (32.8%). Physicians agreed-strongly agreed with 12 of 13 perceived barriers, and there were 26 unique barriers expressed (8 patient-level, 7 provider-level, 11 systems-level).
Conclusions: Deficits in the evaluation and management of CKD, and numerous barriers to CKD care were discovered. Recommendations include the development of a national CKD guideline, local CKD continuous medical education seminars, and public health campaigns on CKD education.