No shortening of the patellar tendon during two-stage total knee arthroplasty revision using articulating spacers

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Nils Meißner, Andreas M. Halder, Oscar Torney, Alexander Preis, Jonas P. Sina, Daniel Schrednitzki
{"title":"No shortening of the patellar tendon during two-stage total knee arthroplasty revision using articulating spacers","authors":"Nils Meißner, Andreas M. Halder, Oscar Torney, Alexander Preis, Jonas P. Sina, Daniel Schrednitzki","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05545-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Surgical techniques in two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) include the use of articulating spacers and static spacers. Shortening of the patellar tendon could be a reason for inferior functional outcomes in two-stage septic rTKA . The aim of this study was to determine if articulating spacers also have negative effects on the extensor mechanism in rTKA.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study includes 65 consecutive patients (23 women, 42 men, age 71.3 ± 1.2; range, 51.2–88.6 years) undergoing septic two-stage rTKA using an articulating spacer between 2014 and 2021 in a single orthopedic center. For all patients, calibrated true lateral radiographs before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) explantation (T0), directly after TKA explantation (T1), shortly before TKA reimplantation (T2) and 6–8 days after TKA reimplantation (T3) were used to calculate the modified Insall Salvati ratio (mISR).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Overall, the mISR decreased significantly immediately after explantation (T0 vs. T1, <i>p</i> = 0.002) from 1.43 ± 0.03 to 1.36 ± 0.03 and remained stable until T2 (1.37 ± 0.02, p = 0.74). Following TKA reimplantation, the mISR increased again to 1.43 ± 0.03 (T3). There were no significant differences between T0 and T3 (<i>p</i> = 0.88). Six out of 65 patients (9%) experienced patellar tendon shortening &gt; 10% at T3.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Septic two-stage revision TKA using an articulating spacer does not lead to patellar tendon shortening in the majority of cases. This study suggests that one reason for the improved range of motion after reimplantation may be the use of articulating spacers compared to static spacers. <i>Keywords: revision total knee arthroplasty</i>,<i> articulating spacer</i>,<i> infection</i>,<i> PJI</i>,<i> two-stage revision</i>,<i> revision arthroplasty</i>,<i> patellar tendon</i>,</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05545-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Surgical techniques in two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) include the use of articulating spacers and static spacers. Shortening of the patellar tendon could be a reason for inferior functional outcomes in two-stage septic rTKA . The aim of this study was to determine if articulating spacers also have negative effects on the extensor mechanism in rTKA.

Methods

This retrospective study includes 65 consecutive patients (23 women, 42 men, age 71.3 ± 1.2; range, 51.2–88.6 years) undergoing septic two-stage rTKA using an articulating spacer between 2014 and 2021 in a single orthopedic center. For all patients, calibrated true lateral radiographs before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) explantation (T0), directly after TKA explantation (T1), shortly before TKA reimplantation (T2) and 6–8 days after TKA reimplantation (T3) were used to calculate the modified Insall Salvati ratio (mISR).

Results

Overall, the mISR decreased significantly immediately after explantation (T0 vs. T1, p = 0.002) from 1.43 ± 0.03 to 1.36 ± 0.03 and remained stable until T2 (1.37 ± 0.02, p = 0.74). Following TKA reimplantation, the mISR increased again to 1.43 ± 0.03 (T3). There were no significant differences between T0 and T3 (p = 0.88). Six out of 65 patients (9%) experienced patellar tendon shortening > 10% at T3.

Conclusions

Septic two-stage revision TKA using an articulating spacer does not lead to patellar tendon shortening in the majority of cases. This study suggests that one reason for the improved range of motion after reimplantation may be the use of articulating spacers compared to static spacers. Keywords: revision total knee arthroplasty, articulating spacer, infection, PJI, two-stage revision, revision arthroplasty, patellar tendon,

Abstract Image

使用铰接式垫片进行两阶段全膝关节置换术翻修时,髌腱不会缩短
背景两阶段翻修全膝关节置换术(rTKA)的手术技术包括使用关节间隙器和静态间隙器。髌腱缩短可能是两阶段化脓性膝关节置换术(rTKA)功能较差的一个原因。这项回顾性研究包括 2014 年至 2021 年期间在一家骨科中心连续接受化脓性两阶段 rTKA(使用铰接式撑杆)手术的 65 名患者(23 名女性,42 名男性,年龄为 71.3 ± 1.2;范围为 51.2-88.6 岁)。对所有患者进行了全膝关节置换术(TKA)前(T0)、TKA置换术后(T1)、TKA再植入术前(T2)和TKA再植入术后6-8天(T3)的校准真侧位X光片检查,以计算改良的Insall Salvati比值(mISR)。结果总体而言,mISR 在剥离后立即(T0 与 T1 相比,p = 0.002)从 1.43 ± 0.03 显著下降至 1.36 ± 0.03,并在 T2 前保持稳定(1.37 ± 0.02,p = 0.74)。重新植入 TKA 后,mISR 再次上升至 1.43 ± 0.03(T3)。T0和T3之间无明显差异(p = 0.88)。65例患者中有6例(9%)出现髌腱缩短;T3时为10%。结论在大多数病例中,使用铰接垫片的两阶段翻修TKA不会导致髌腱缩短。这项研究表明,与静态垫片相比,使用铰接式垫片可能是再植术后活动范围得到改善的原因之一。关键词:翻修全膝关节置换术、铰接式垫片、感染、PJI、两阶段翻修、翻修关节置换术、髌腱、
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信