Most Beefalo cattle have no detectable bison genetic ancestry

Beth Shapiro, Jonas Oppenheimer, Michael P Heaton, Kristen L Kuhn, Ed Green, Harvey D Blackburn, Timothy P.L. Smith
{"title":"Most Beefalo cattle have no detectable bison genetic ancestry","authors":"Beth Shapiro, Jonas Oppenheimer, Michael P Heaton, Kristen L Kuhn, Ed Green, Harvey D Blackburn, Timothy P.L. Smith","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.16.613218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hybridization is common among lineages in the genus Bos, often mediated through human management for the selection of adaptive or desirable traits. A recent example is the American Beefalo cattle breed, which was developed in the 1970s and defined as a hybrid between American bison (Bison bison) and cattle (Bos taurus). The American Beefalo Association typically require 3/8 bison ancestry to qualify as Beefalo. Here, we sought to characterize admixed ancestry among Beefalo as a component of a larger project to understand the role of hybridization in shaping present-day diversity in bison and cattle. We generated genomic data from 50 historical and present-day Beefalo and bison hybrids, including several important founding animals, as well as from 10 bison originating from commercial herds that represent potential sources of bison ancestry in Beefalo. We found that most Beefalo did not contain detectable bison ancestry. No individual Beefalo within our data set satisfies the ancestry requirements specified by the American Beefalo Association (ABA), although several Beefalo had smaller proportions of bison ancestry (2-18%). Some beefalo had detectable indicine cattle ancestry (2-38%), suggesting that hybridization of taurine and zebu cattle may contribute to morphological similarity between some Beefalo and bison. Overall, ancestry profiles of Beefalo and bison hybrid genomes are consistent with repeated backcrossing to either parental species rather than the breeding between hybrids themselves, implying significant barriers to gene flow between bison and cattle. Our results call into question the 3/8 bison ancestry targeted by the breed association and demonstrate the value of genomic information in examining claims of interspecies gene flow among Bos species.","PeriodicalId":501183,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Evolutionary Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Evolutionary Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.16.613218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hybridization is common among lineages in the genus Bos, often mediated through human management for the selection of adaptive or desirable traits. A recent example is the American Beefalo cattle breed, which was developed in the 1970s and defined as a hybrid between American bison (Bison bison) and cattle (Bos taurus). The American Beefalo Association typically require 3/8 bison ancestry to qualify as Beefalo. Here, we sought to characterize admixed ancestry among Beefalo as a component of a larger project to understand the role of hybridization in shaping present-day diversity in bison and cattle. We generated genomic data from 50 historical and present-day Beefalo and bison hybrids, including several important founding animals, as well as from 10 bison originating from commercial herds that represent potential sources of bison ancestry in Beefalo. We found that most Beefalo did not contain detectable bison ancestry. No individual Beefalo within our data set satisfies the ancestry requirements specified by the American Beefalo Association (ABA), although several Beefalo had smaller proportions of bison ancestry (2-18%). Some beefalo had detectable indicine cattle ancestry (2-38%), suggesting that hybridization of taurine and zebu cattle may contribute to morphological similarity between some Beefalo and bison. Overall, ancestry profiles of Beefalo and bison hybrid genomes are consistent with repeated backcrossing to either parental species rather than the breeding between hybrids themselves, implying significant barriers to gene flow between bison and cattle. Our results call into question the 3/8 bison ancestry targeted by the breed association and demonstrate the value of genomic information in examining claims of interspecies gene flow among Bos species.
大多数肉牛没有可检测到的野牛基因血统
杂交在牛属动物中很常见,通常是通过人类管理来选择适应性或理想性状。最近的一个例子是 20 世纪 70 年代发展起来的美国肉牛品种,它被定义为美洲野牛(Bison bison)和牛(Bos taurus)的杂交种。美国肉牛协会通常要求 3/8 的野牛血统才有资格成为肉牛。在这里,我们试图描述牛水牛的混血祖先,作为了解杂交在形成当今野牛和牛多样性中的作用的更大项目的一部分。我们从 50 头历史上和现在的黄牛和野牛杂交种(包括几头重要的始祖牛)以及 10 头来自商业牛群的野牛(代表黄牛野牛祖先的潜在来源)中获得了基因组数据。我们发现,大多数牛水牛并不含有可检测到的野牛血统。在我们的数据集中,没有一头肉牛符合美国肉牛协会(ABA)规定的血统要求,尽管有几头肉牛的野牛血统比例较小(2-18%)。一些肉牛具有可检测到的籼牛祖先(2-38%),这表明金牛和斑马牛的杂交可能是造成一些肉牛和野牛形态相似的原因。总体而言,水牛和野牛杂交基因组的祖先特征与反复回交到亲本物种而非杂交种之间的繁殖相一致,这意味着野牛和牛之间的基因流动存在重大障碍。我们的研究结果对品种协会所针对的 3/8 野牛血统提出了质疑,并证明了基因组信息在研究野牛物种间基因流动方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信