Improving on polygenic scores across complex traits using select and shrink with summary statistics (S4) and LDpred2

IF 3.5 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Jonathan P. Tyrer, Pei-Chen Peng, Amber A. DeVries, Simon A. Gayther, Michelle R. Jones, Paul D. Pharoah
{"title":"Improving on polygenic scores across complex traits using select and shrink with summary statistics (S4) and LDpred2","authors":"Jonathan P. Tyrer, Pei-Chen Peng, Amber A. DeVries, Simon A. Gayther, Michelle R. Jones, Paul D. Pharoah","doi":"10.1186/s12864-024-10706-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As precision medicine advances, polygenic scores (PGS) have become increasingly important for clinical risk assessment. Many methods have been developed to create polygenic models with increased accuracy for risk prediction. Our select and shrink with summary statistics (S4) PGS method has previously been shown to accurately predict the polygenic risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Here, we applied S4 PGS to 12 phenotypes for UK Biobank participants, and compared it with the LDpred2 and a combined S4 + LDpred2 method. The S4 + LDpred2 method provided overall improved PGS accuracy across a variety of phenotypes for UK Biobank participants. Additionally, the S4 + LDpred2 method had the best estimated PGS accuracy in Finnish and Japanese populations. We also addressed the challenge of limited genotype level data by developing the PGS models using only GWAS summary statistics. Taken together, the S4 + LDpred2 method represents an improvement in overall PGS accuracy across multiple phenotypes and populations.","PeriodicalId":9030,"journal":{"name":"BMC Genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10706-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As precision medicine advances, polygenic scores (PGS) have become increasingly important for clinical risk assessment. Many methods have been developed to create polygenic models with increased accuracy for risk prediction. Our select and shrink with summary statistics (S4) PGS method has previously been shown to accurately predict the polygenic risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Here, we applied S4 PGS to 12 phenotypes for UK Biobank participants, and compared it with the LDpred2 and a combined S4 + LDpred2 method. The S4 + LDpred2 method provided overall improved PGS accuracy across a variety of phenotypes for UK Biobank participants. Additionally, the S4 + LDpred2 method had the best estimated PGS accuracy in Finnish and Japanese populations. We also addressed the challenge of limited genotype level data by developing the PGS models using only GWAS summary statistics. Taken together, the S4 + LDpred2 method represents an improvement in overall PGS accuracy across multiple phenotypes and populations.
随着精准医学的发展,多基因评分(PGS)在临床风险评估中变得越来越重要。目前已开发出许多方法来创建多基因模型,以提高风险预测的准确性。我们的用汇总统计进行选择和收缩(S4)的 PGS 方法已被证明能准确预测上皮性卵巢癌的多基因风险。在这里,我们将 S4 PGS 应用于英国生物库参与者的 12 种表型,并与 LDpred2 和 S4 + LDpred2 组合方法进行了比较。S4 + LDpred2 方法全面提高了英国生物库参与者各种表型的 PGS 准确性。此外,在芬兰和日本人群中,S4 + LDpred2 方法的 PGS 估计准确率最高。我们还解决了基因型水平数据有限的难题,只使用 GWAS 的摘要统计建立了 PGS 模型。综上所述,S4 + LDpred2 方法代表了在多种表型和人群中整体 PGS 准确率的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Genomics
BMC Genomics 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
769
审稿时长
6.4 months
期刊介绍: BMC Genomics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of genome-scale analysis, functional genomics, and proteomics. BMC Genomics is part of the BMC series which publishes subject-specific journals focused on the needs of individual research communities across all areas of biology and medicine. We offer an efficient, fair and friendly peer review service, and are committed to publishing all sound science, provided that there is some advance in knowledge presented by the work.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信