My Views Do Not Reflect Those of My Employer: Differences in Behavior of Organizations' Official and Personal Social Media Accounts

Esa Palosaari, Ted Hsuan Yun Chen, Arttu Malkamäki, Mikko Kivelä
{"title":"My Views Do Not Reflect Those of My Employer: Differences in Behavior of Organizations' Official and Personal Social Media Accounts","authors":"Esa Palosaari, Ted Hsuan Yun Chen, Arttu Malkamäki, Mikko Kivelä","doi":"arxiv-2409.11759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On social media, the boundaries between people's private and public lives\noften blur. The need to navigate both roles, which are governed by distinct\nnorms, impacts how individuals conduct themselves online, and presents\nmethodological challenges for researchers. We conduct a systematic exploration\non how an organization's official Twitter accounts and its members' personal\naccounts differ. Using a climate change Twitter data set as our case, we find\nsubstantial differences in activity and connectivity across the organizational\nlevels we examined. The levels differed considerably in their overall retweet\nnetwork structures, and accounts within each level were more likely to have\nsimilar connections than accounts at different levels. We illustrate the\nimplications of these differences for applied research by showing that the\nlevels closer to the core of the organization display more sectoral homophily\nbut less triadic closure, and how each level consists of very different group\nstructures. Our results show that the common practice of solely analyzing\naccounts from a single organizational level, grouping together all levels, or\nexcluding certain levels can lead to a skewed understanding of how\norganizations are represented on social media.","PeriodicalId":501032,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Social and Information Networks","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Social and Information Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On social media, the boundaries between people's private and public lives often blur. The need to navigate both roles, which are governed by distinct norms, impacts how individuals conduct themselves online, and presents methodological challenges for researchers. We conduct a systematic exploration on how an organization's official Twitter accounts and its members' personal accounts differ. Using a climate change Twitter data set as our case, we find substantial differences in activity and connectivity across the organizational levels we examined. The levels differed considerably in their overall retweet network structures, and accounts within each level were more likely to have similar connections than accounts at different levels. We illustrate the implications of these differences for applied research by showing that the levels closer to the core of the organization display more sectoral homophily but less triadic closure, and how each level consists of very different group structures. Our results show that the common practice of solely analyzing accounts from a single organizational level, grouping together all levels, or excluding certain levels can lead to a skewed understanding of how organizations are represented on social media.
我的观点并不反映我雇主的观点:组织官方和个人社交媒体账户的行为差异
在社交媒体上,人们的私人生活和公共生活之间的界限常常变得模糊。人们需要同时扮演两种角色,而这两种角色又受不同规范的约束,这影响了个人在网上的行为方式,也给研究人员带来了方法论上的挑战。我们对一个组织的官方 Twitter 账户和其成员的个人账户有何不同进行了系统性探索。以气候变化 Twitter 数据集为例,我们发现不同组织级别的活动和连接性存在巨大差异。各层级的转发网络结构差异很大,而且各层级的账户比不同层级的账户更有可能拥有相似的连接。我们说明了这些差异对应用研究的影响,显示出更接近组织核心的层级显示出更多的部门同质性,但较少的三元组封闭性,以及每个层级如何由非常不同的群体结构组成。我们的研究结果表明,仅分析来自单一组织层级的账户、将所有层级分组或排除某些层级的常见做法会导致对组织如何在社交媒体上得到体现的理解出现偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信